nil_yadav wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am using Hyperion 9 Portal run by apache Tomcat which is set up on a unix
> machine.
> At times during login after authentication we get an error as shown below
This is a question for the users list. See http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
Mark
All,
The update to commons-pool-1.3 has caused a memory leak[1]. Further, [2]
suggests it may cause reload issues in some circumstances.
The release note [3] for commons-pool-1.3 does indicate a large number of
bugs have been fixed compared to commons-pool-1.2. That said, I do not
believe we upgr
Peter Rossbach wrote:
> +1
>
> See you a chance the commons dbcp or pool team fix the bug and we can
> use a newer version?
Looking at the history of the issue, I am guessing not in the short term.
I'll see what I can do to help out (if anything) to speed along a 1.4 release.
Mark
Ducky wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just noticed those following messages in my apache log files, and
> wasn't able to find the cause. Any documentations/insights for those
> error messages?
You are more likely to get a useful response on the users list.
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
Mark
-
Nethra Devegowda -X (ndevegow - WIPRO at Cisco) wrote:
> How can we configure cactus with web application?
>
> Please mail me the file sturctures and the contents in the required
> files. And the paths .
Please don't hi-jack threads. Also, you are more likely to get a useful
response on the users
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-11-26 at 21:09 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Mon Nov 26 13:09:21 2007
>> New Revision: 598430
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=598430&view=rev
>> Log:
>> More license fixes
>
>> +
>> +* Fix another license issue
>> + http
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> RewriteEngine On
> RewriteRule /faq/(.*) http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ/$1 [R=301]
+1
I am not 100% the mapping will be this simple. It is is, great. If not, we
could either map each page or do:
RewriteRule /faq/(.*) http://wiki.apache.org/tomcat/FAQ [R=301]
Mark
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On Dec 7, 2007 9:36 AM, Tim Funk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The last step is to archive or delete the existing faq pages ..
>> site/trunk/xdocs-faq
>> site/trunk/docs/faq (except for .htaccess)
>>
>> I'm unsure which svn commands to run
>> svn delete
>> - or -
>> svn move T
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> that's a good point, one would expect most names to be pooled when it
> comes to implicit class loading, although as you say, not a guarantee.
> in findClassInternal, we do synchronized(this), so maybe we should not
> need to introduce another locking object, when w
This is a question for the users list.
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> 1. annotation dependency injection patch
How does this compare to
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819 ?
> 2. cluster JMX configurations
+1
> 3. any NIO improvements that haven't been ported
+1
Mark
David Jencks wrote:
> On Dec 18, 2007, at 1:40 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>>> 1. annotation dependency injection patch
>> How does this compare to
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43819 ?
>
> I don't see a
jean-frederic clere wrote:
> I'll tag the tcnative to 1.1.12.
+1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
handlers = org.apache.juli.FileHandler
org.apache.juli.FileHandler.level = FINE
org.apache.juli.FileHandler.directory = ${catalina.base}/logs
org.apache.juli.FileHandler.prefix = mylog.
Credit:
This issue was discovered by Delian Krustev.
References:
http://tomcat.apache.org/security.html
Mark Thomas
*** Pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: fhanik
> Date: Mon Dec 17 12:55:56 2007
> New Revision: 605000
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605000&view=rev
> Log:
> port new annotation logic from previous trunk
-1.
With this patch in place I get a whole bunch of ISEs in the logs when I
restart a
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> Author: fhanik
>>> Date: Mon Dec 17 12:55:56 2007
>>> New Revision: 605000
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=605000&vie
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> ok, this should take care of the problem, sorry for the delay
Delay? That was pretty speedy ;)
Your change fixes the problem I was seeing. Veto withdrawn.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> + -1: fhanik - lets not do e.printStackTrace, handle the error and log it
> correctly,
Fair point. I'll fix that.
also, have the diff only change lines that are actually changed. makes it
easier to review
Which lines do you mean? The diff looks normal to me.
Mark
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> + -1: fhanik - lets not do e.printStackTrace, handle the error and
>>> log it correctly,
>>>
>>
>> Fair point. I'll fix that.
>>
>>
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> we have a lot of updates added in, I think it may be good to set a date
> for our next release and work towards that
+1.
There are a stack of changes (both committed and proposed) for 5.5.x as
well. It would be good to plan a 5.5.x release as well.
I'll also do a
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Maybe it doesn't hurt much, but I'm not that happy about it anyway. Can
> I redo it a bit in 6.0 ?
Of course. As long as the bug is fixed I have no preference for who
actually writes the code ;)
If I find time to port the handful of patches I have for TC6 then I'll
include
maxt wrote:
> Further to the below, the same situation applies to the use of the Robot
> class - keystrokes appear correctly when using the Console, but nothing
> happens when using the Service.
>
> Max
Both your questions belong on the users list as per
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
Pleas
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sat Nov 4 16:33:02 2006
>> New Revision: 471306
>
> I think you should use the strict compliance flag, as only 2 people need
> activity checking.
Good idea. One commit coming up.
Mark
--
Andrew Friebel wrote:
> I hope I have submitted this question via the correct mechanism.
I am afraid not. This is a question for the Tomcat users list since it
relates to development of *with* Tomcat. The dev list is for matters
relating to the development *of* Tomcat. A small but important diffe
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> sure, where do you have them, or do you want me to run a build against
>> the tag?
>
> The usual location at www/www.apache.org/dist/tomcat-6/v6.0.1. For the
> next build, I'll have a new key, and I'll be using gpg instead.
We should not b
Sandy McArthur wrote:
> Attached is what I think may be an even more improved fix for 37356.
> It does away with the accessCount which should make Remy happy.
> It should prevent sessions currently in use from expiring which should
> make those other 2 people and myself happy.
> It doesn't add any
All,
The root cause of bug 40770[1] is that the default catalina.policy
file does not permit reflection on the Tomcat facade classes which are
exposed to applications as HttpServletRequest, HttpSession etc.
The necessary permissions to enable reflection can only be granted per
package. Granting t
Rainer Jung wrote:
> I added a comment concerning a little experiment I did to
>
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/VELTOOLS-66
>
> Regards,
>
> Rainer
Thanks for this. I was planning to do this tonight but you saved me
the effort. On this basis, I am going to close the Tomcat bug as
inval
Bug 40593 [1] has raised the following question:
When a web app with valid sessions is stopped and the StandardManager
is configured not to serialize the sessions what, if anything, should
the container do in this case?
As far as I can tell from the spec, the container behaviour in these
circumst
Remy/Filip,
Thanks for your input. I'll update the bug report with a brief summary
and come back to this later.
Mark
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> You can still cluster just using AOP without ever involving the manager,
> hence such solutions would be affected by this new behavior.
> at most,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Wed Dec 6 18:51:40 2006
>> New Revision: 483329
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=483329
>> Log:
>> Ensure accept-language header conforms to RFC 2616 and ignore it if it
>> doesn't
>
> I think a "for" l
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Fair point. I'll apply an updated patch shortly.
>
> I can do it too if you don't have time (since I'm the one who's
> suggesting the change).
Since you are offering, I am
Shivaraj Tenginakai wrote:
> I have an outline implementation, that by extending FormAuthenticator,
> allows for (more) complete JAAS support in Tomcat. From what I can tell
> using Google, it could be useful for others too.
>
> I would appreciate, if I can be pointed towards the RFC process, for
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Rainer Jung wrote:
>> My impression now is, that we should backout the commit and the user
>> should instead first try to use the existing Valve as described by Peter.
> I agree,
> Filip
That sounds like the right way forward to me. I'll revert my commit
later toda
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The vote is to release Apache Tomcat 6.0.6 as alpha.
> The build is located here: http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.6/
+1
I keep meaning to say great job on the new build. Much faster than 5.5.x
Mark
---
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> The vote is to release Apache Tomcat 6.0.6 as alpha.
>>> The build is located here:
>>> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.6/
>>
>> +1
&
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sat Dec 23 10:07:34 2006
> New Revision: 489910
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=489910
> Log:
> Make ApplicationDispatcher thread safe. After a very long thread on the users
> list (http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11655879003
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>>
>> Just a heads up that this commit appears to have broken the admin
>> webapp. I am taking a look now...
>
> Filip fixed the algorithm, at least in 6.0.x. Did you look at his fix ?
>
> Rémy
I saw Filip's
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40326 points out
> that DefaultServlet uses File#deleteOnExit which is indeed evil. I
> took a look at the code, it seemed like a simple alternative was
> available, so I went ahead and made the change. However, I'm not an
>
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've uploaded a new 6.0.7 build at
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.7/ which may be released as
> alpha.
>
> Votes ?
+1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additi
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Mon Jan 1 11:31:29 2007
>> New Revision: 491619
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=491619
>> Log:
>> Port RD thread safety patch from TC5
>
> I don't see any justification for this at the moment. Any furt
Tim Funk wrote:
> Is this screaming XSS attack?
>
> Since javadocs in getRequestURI() say ... "The web container does not
> decode this String"
It would be if it wasn't for line 177 of o.a.c.valves.ErrorReportValve
which does:
String message = RequestUtil.filter(response.getMessage());
Mark
--
Tim Funk wrote:
> Sweet - I thought that was the case. [But wanted to make sure.]
>
> -Tim
Better safe than sorry ;)
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
SOF - Dragone Jose Luis wrote:
> Please , I need help !
Please use the users list for questions like this.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.8/
>
> Votes ?
+1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
Can anyone remember anything about the SAX bug referred to in this commit?
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=105096762802715&w=2
The fix appears to be the cause of
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40356
I have spent some time searching various archives no no avail
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Can anyone remember anything about the SAX bug referred to in this
>> commit?
>> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-dev&m=105096762802715&w=2
>
> No, but there's nothing in the spec wh
Tim Funk wrote:
> Does this introduces a new dependency on the jsp-api - which could be a
> regression for people who embed tomcat without using jsp's.
Yes, it does add an additional dependency. I didn't consider the
embedded use case.
> Also the checking is not that aggressive any more in the ca
Jan Luehe wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> thanks for your comments, which I have recorded at:
>
> https://servlet-spec-eg.dev.java.net/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=40
Jan - is it possible to get read access to this?
Cheers,
Mark
-
To unsubs
Jan Luehe wrote:
> please go to https://servlet-spec-eg.dev.java.net/
> and request observer role.
I tried by I can't access any of the project. My id is medthomas.
Could you forward the request for me?
Many thanks,
Mark
-
To
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday)
> to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit
> earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466).
>
> Comments ?
Sounds good. I have a handful of pat
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Sat Jan 27 16:55:24 2007
>> New Revision: 500716
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=500716
>> Log:
>> Port fix bug 39088 that prevents infinite loops when an exception is
>> thrown the returns itself for ge
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> An alternative approach that has since occurred to me is to modify
>> JspException in the same way as ServletException so the standard
>> exception chaining is always used. This would enable getCause to be
>> used in all ca
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Fair enough. My biggest concern was the lack of JspException
>> unwrapping. The SQLException support was a nice to have but I'm not
>> that bothered about it.
>
> I never used the SQL exception nesting, so I don
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I think it would be a good idea early next week (possibly late monday)
>> to do a new build and integrate the client cert fix I did a little bit
>> earlier. I have seen a possible fix to do for NIO as well (41466).
>>
>> Comments ?
>
> Ok,
Sorry for the noise. Some muppet has been randomly editing bugs. I
believe I have corrected all their changes. I'll ping infra to let
them know in case the damage has been more wide spread.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL P
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Few days ago I changed my email address for Tomcat Users List
> with standard unsubscribe/subscribe, and although I can receive
> messages, send messages, I cannot see the messages send by me.
> (mladen_dot_turk_at_gmail_dot_com)
>
> It looks others can see the messag
Guershon Marc wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like to know what are the changing to do in the configuration
> files (and which files are they ?) of the TOMCAT APACHE 5.5.9 to make
> it enable to multi-application work,
> so more than one application can use the same instance of the APACHE.
This is
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Candidate binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6/v6.0.9/
>
> Votes ?
alpha +1
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROT
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mladen Turk wrote:
>> If you think its a PITA, don't do it.
>
> Apparently, it has to be done that way. I think it's a PITA because it
> does take a lot of time (every vote needs a few days, etc).
The bit that has to be done (ie is mandated by Apache rules) is a vote
by th
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Given that a -1 vote is not valid for a release vote, as soon as we
>
> Umm, why is a -1 not valid for a release?
Standard Apache procedure as per
http://www.apache.org/f
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Yoav Shapira wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > On 2/2/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> Given that a -1 vote is not valid for a release vote
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> I am ok with changing the release process if something simpler is
> possible. I am interested in speeding up the process by cutting back on
> the number of votes.
>
> The process would be:
> 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on
> people.apache.org/~remm/to
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I propose the following release process for Tomcat 6.0.x:
>
> 1. create tarball and unofficial binaries, put them on
> people.apache.org/~remm/tomcat-6
> 2. announce candidate binaries are available for testing
> 3. wait 2-3 days for testing
> 4. call for alpha/bet
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> oops, wasn't clear enough.
> I don't have the bandwidth to track down this issue right now, if
> someone wants to go in and fix the build dependencies so that the
> AprEndpoint class indeed is in the classpath when the AJP connector gets
> compiled
Looks like it co
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> oops, wasn't clear enough.
>> I don't have the bandwidth to track down this issue right now, if
>> someone wants to go in and fix the build dependencies so that the
>> AprEndpoint class indeed is in the
All,
I have started to put together some additional security pages based on
httpd. I have only added text for a couple vulnerabilities but the
plan is to include all those in the CVE list plus any I can find in
the archives.
The draft is currently on people.a.o at
http://people.apache.org/~markt/
Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> According to the (slightly) updated release process, the 6.0.10 tag is:
>> [ ] Broken
>> [ ] Alpha
>> [ ] Beta
>> [X] Stable
>
> So far, there are 3 binding votes for stable (with one from an inactive
> committer), and 1 for beta. While a beta or stable release could legal
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Ok folks, for those that want to see the 5.0.22, please provide some
> feedback.
> Without votes, I can't push out a release.
>
> Filip
>
> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Candidate binaries are available here:
>> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat/tomcat-5
Ian Darwin wrote:
> Good stuff. Minor typo in the 5-x page:
>
>>If directory listings are enabled,
>>a diretcory listing will be shown.
Thanks. Fixed.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to nominate Fabian Carrion as a committer on the Apache Tomcat
> project. Fabian contributed many useful patches, including helping add
> support for Servlet 2.5 in Apache Tomcat 6.0.
>
> Votes ?
+1
Mark
Looking into bug 37072 has identified a conflict in the spec.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37072
Consider the following sequence of calls:
response.setCharacterEncoding("UTF-8");
response.getWriter();
response.reset();
After this the writer encoding and response encoding do
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Author: markt
>> Date: Thu Mar 1 18:38:26 2007
>> New Revision: 513601
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=513601
>> Log:
>> Port fix for bug 41739. Servlets with a load-on-startup value of zero
>> should be loaded first.
>
> I
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Looking into bug 37072 has identified a conflict in the spec.
>> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37072
>>
>> Consider the following sequence of calls:
>>
>> response.setCharacterE
Jean-Frederic wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-02-15 at 22:34 -0500, Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Any comments before I commit these changes to the live site?
>
> Add a mod_jk Apache Tomcat JK
Done, with information about the recently announc
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> [ ] Broken
> [ ] Alpha
> [ ] Beta
> [X] Stable
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Due to a recent screw up, my binaries didn't match the tag in SVN. This
> has been corrected.
> A new build has been run from the tag, the TCK tests have all been run
> and passed.
>
> Candidate binaries are available here:
> http://people.apache.org/~fhanik/tomcat
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
>> Tag is stable but the source distro has a few things that it shouldn't
>> as reported in http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41766
>>
>> - apache-tomcat-5
Rainer Jung wrote:
> [ ] Try to improve the header files for a 1.2.21.1
> [X] Simply release 1.2.22
> [ ] Don't release at all, wait for more fixes or features before releasing.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fo
Mladen Turk wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Modified:
>> tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/ (props changed)
>>
>> Propchange: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jni/
>> --
>>
>> --- svn:ignore (added)
>> +++ svn:ignore Sat Mar 17
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.35.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-4.1.35/apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz
The standard distributions are also available from the same directory.
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
Tomcat 4.1.35 is:
[ ] Stable
[
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Tomcat 4.1.35 is:
> [X] Stable
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Alpha
Here's my vote to kick things off.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 3/18/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.35.
>>
>> Download from:
>> http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-4.1.35/apache-tomcat-4.1.34-src.tar.gz
>>
>
&g
*** Please note the corrected file name. ***
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.35.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/tomcat-4.1.35/apache-tomcat-4.1.35-src.tar.gz
The standard distributions are also available from the same directory.
The vote will run for approxima
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Tomcat 4.1.35 is:
> [X] Stable
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Alpha
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Mark Thomas wrote:
>> Tomcat 4.1.35 is:
>> [X] Stable
>> [ ] Beta
>> [ ] Alpha
I am withdrawing my vote for this release and the release candidate as
the build appears to be bad (the wrong mx4j.jar is used).
I haven't as yet got to the bott
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> Hi,
> The svn:externals hookup for svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/current
> points to the 5.5 branch trunk, as it has been for a while.
No it doesn't. /current contains three directories one for each of
tc3, tc4, tc5. It is intended to provide a convenient single checkout
fo
Yoav Shapira wrote:
> On 3/25/07, Mark Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Since tc6 is a single component, there is no need to provide such a
>> directory.
>
> I wonder if we should still have current/tc6 for consistency.
-0. I can see the benefit of consistenc
olav wrote:
> I'm searching for a method to reload my web application from within the web
> app. Like a html-button that trigger something that reloads my web app when
> the user clicks it. Annyone know a good way to do this?
This is a question for the users list.
Mark
--
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have deleted and added as external trunk/native/connector,
> because there is no reason to have that duplicated.
> Perhaps the similar (via external) can be done for
> org/apache/tomcat/jni as well.
>
> Comments?
I like removing the duplication. The problem with do
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Author: markt
> Date: Sun Apr 1 13:30:12 2007
> New Revision: 524667
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=524667
> Log:
> Tagging 4.1.35
>
> Added:
>
> tomcat/servletapi/tags/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/TOMCAT_4_1_35/servlet2.3-jsp1.2-tc4.x/
> - co
All,
Please vote on releasing Apache Tomcat 4.1.36.
Download from:
http://tomcat.apache.org/dev/dist/apache-tomcat-4.1.36-src.tar.gz
The standard distributions are also available from the same location.
The vote will run for approximately 72 hours.
Tomcat 4.1.36 is:
[ ] Stable
[ ] Beta
[ ] Alp
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Tomcat 4.1.36 is:
> [X] Stable
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Alpha
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mark Thomas wrote:
> Tomcat 4.1.36 is:
> [ ] Stable
> [ ] Beta
> [ ] Alpha
There were 3 votes for stable (Remy, Yoav and me) and no other votes
so 4.1.36 is approved for release as stable. I'll start this process
now and send out the notice once the mirrors have had a chan
The Apache Tomcat team is proud to announce the immediate availability
of Tomcat 4.1.36 stable. This build contains numerous library updates,
a small number of bug fixes and two important security fixes.
Apache Tomcat is an implementation of the Java Server Pages 1.2 and
Java Servlet 2.3 specifica
Abhinay Kartik Reddyreddy wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am working on web-services(jaxrpc) and trying to set up the tomcat server
> so that the server processes only two requests concurrently, the third
> request should be dropped if it occurs at the time of processing the first 2
> requests.
> how do i con
risky57 wrote:
> can anyone point me in the right direction?
The users list. See
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Venkata Naveen wrote:
> where to get the tomcat admin package, and how to install that admin into
> the tomcat directory.
>
> please help me friends...
Please use the users list
http://tomcat.apache.org/lists.html
-
To unsubscri
Remy Maucherat wrote:
> Remy Maucherat wrote:
>> If REQUEST_TIME_VALUE should be set for EL too
>
> The javadoc for getAttribute in TagData indicates it should be set for
> EL too.
Yep. I was looking at JSP.13.9.9.3
> I recommend this patch instead for TC 6.0:
Thanks. I'll take another look at th
Mladen Turk wrote:
> Hi,
> Some files on /x1/www/tomcat.apache.org
> have 0644, instead 0664 and are owned by markt.
>
> Mark can you change those the files to a correct permission?
Fixed. Sorry.
Mark
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
201 - 300 of 9336 matches
Mail list logo
