Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 5/22/07, William L. Thomson Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If possible when new versions of Tomcat native be announced on list?
Seems Tomcat 6.0.13 requires 1.1.10. First I became aware of it, was
when user reported the problem. Granted I should have discovered it
William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-23 at 13:19 +0200, Mladen Turk wrote:
For 6.0.13 the required version is 1.1.8 and recommended
is 1.1.10 and that is clearly printed whenever Tomcat is started.
I'm not sure what more is needed.
According to the bug report, it required 1.1.10
Hi,
I've committed to the trunk the modified service.bat that
automatically detects the host CPU (x86, amd64, ia64) and
whether the JVM is 64 bit or not.
So it automatically picks tomcat6.exe, amd64/tomcat6.exe
depending on the above rules.
However it requires that the .zip distro contains
Rainer Jung wrote:
I suggest, that we build against httpd 2.x always thread-safe, at least
unless the existing flag -enable-prefork is used and document this
behaviour.
+1
Regards,
Mladen.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
Jean-Frederic wrote:
On Mon, 2007-06-04 at 12:08 +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Jun 4 05:08:33 2007
New Revision: 544137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=544137
Log:
Add simple URI normalizer that can deal with things like %252e%252e. This is
mostly
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Jun 4 05:08:33 2007
New Revision: 544137
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=544137
Log:
Add simple URI normalizer that can deal with things like %252e%252e. This is
mostly copy/paste from the IIS module
Mark Thomas wrote:
Did I mention that uri is *not* decoded twice?
You did and I still don't agree. The root cause of CVE-2007-1860 was a
double decoding. Once in httpd/mod_jk and once in Tomcat.
Why do you don't agree?
Please provide a use case and confirm your statements are
legitimate.
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mark Thomas wrote:
As I see it, we have two options:
a) Prevent Tomcat from decoding the uri a second time at step 7 above
b) Re-encode the uri in mod_jk between steps 5 and 6
I think:
- it's the proxy which should have options for adapting to what the
proxied server
Mark Thomas wrote:
Single ajp13 worker
jkMount /jsp-examples/* worker1
A simple 'hello world' html file was created at (directories created
where required):
appBase/jsp-examples/%2e%2e/servlets-examples/index.html
Test 1: Tomcat only
Jean-Frederic wrote:
Add ForwardURIProxy to the URl handling option.
common/jk_url.c is just a porting of the routines
from proxy_util.c (Apache httpd).
After quite a few discussions, I think this should be the only mode
available for URI handling, as the two others are broken.
Comments ?
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Why?
Let's stop a bit and test things before.
Jean-Frédéric proposes implementing the same behavior as mod_proxy, so I
don't see how this can be a bad thing.
First of all I didn't said it's a bad thing or anything like that.
We need the same behavior
jean-frederic clere wrote:
I have noted that nothing has happened in tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk3.
Nearly 2 months without real road map nor clear specifications, what is
wrong?
I don't think anything is wrong. We are waiting for the list of
requirements, and any suggestion from yours or
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Remy Maucherat wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: mturk
Date: Tue Jun 26 05:28:00 2007
New Revision: 550789
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=550789
Log:
Do not pass session id if it is zero length. For now only log those
attempts. We should consider
jean-frederic clere wrote:
/* We checked for space !! */
-strncpy((char *)msg-buf + msg-len, param, len + 1); /*
including \0 */
+memcpy(msg-buf + msg-len, param, len + 1); /* including \0 */
Why do you remove the (char *)?
Cause memcpy uses void* so no need for
Yefym Dmukh wrote:
Actually the following was happening: the LB sends requests and gets the
session sticky, continuously sending the upcoming requests to the same
cluster node. At the certain period of time the JVM started the major
garbage collection (full gc) and spent, mentioned above, 20
Yefym Dmukh wrote:
Actually the following was happening: the LB sends requests and gets the
session sticky, continuously sending the upcoming requests to the same
cluster node. At the certain period of time the JVM started the major
garbage collection (full gc) and spent, mentioned above, 20
Yefym Dmukh wrote:
You have oxymoron here. With session stickiness you are willingly
tear down the load balancer correctness because you don't wish/can
have session replication.
Generally you are right, but the ideal world is not the reality:
we use apache my faces implementation of jsf where
jean-frederic clere wrote:
Hi,
The examples (servlet and JSP) have caused a list of security issues.
I think we should remove them from the Tomcat binary packages (6.0 and
5.x at least).
Any comments?
If the examples are broken, then we have serious problems,
either with examples or with
Joe Nathan wrote:
Henri Gomez wrote:
Do you want a 100% Java PHP engine or just a simple native to Java bridge
?
I mean PHP scripts are processed as JSP are handled inside Tomcat
without installing any other things as built-in features. Imagine if
Tomcat can handle JSP, PHP, even ASP
+1
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
we had exactly 10 downloads of our quality check tarball since the
announcement yesterday. Three of the testers reported back positively
(one of them via direct mail), no reports were negative. Since I
received already a lot of positive feedback from the preceding
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.24 is:
[x] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
Regards,
Mladen
Hi,
We have a problem with 1.2.24 that luckily is not security leak,
but it is security related.
The problem is that 401 from Tomcat without body
(a standard HTTP_UNAUTHORIZED) is treated as 401, meaning
that Apache is returning 401 page instead passing 401
to the client.
I already patched the
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I don't full yunderstand this fix. From your other mail i though it's a
regression, but the code in this region is the same at least since
1.2.18 (more than a year). So I have the impression, that this is not a
regression.
You can try 1.2.23 (it works). 1.2.24
Rainer Jung wrote:
OK, I'll go into it. I think I would propose a slightly different patch,
but I'll investigate, why 23 and 24 are different.
The reason why I started to pose querstions is, that I found it a little
strange to make an exception for exactly one status code.
My impression is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Aug 2 05:10:48 2007
New Revision: 562090
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=562090
Log:
Revert the quickfix r562022. It looks like we found the real problem
with r562085.
Perfect. The fix makes login working once again.
Regards,
for
nsapi on which platform. I think the nsapi and general platforms
considerations should not be done before 1.2.25, but everything else
looks OK to me.
Regards,
Rainer
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Thu Aug 2 05:10:48 2007
New Revision: 562090
URL: http
Rainer Jung wrote:
Apache Tomcat Connectors 1.2.25 is:
[X] Stable - no major issues, no regressions
[ ] Beta - at least one significant issue -- tell us what it is
[ ] Alpha - multiple significant issues -- tell us what they are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: markt
Date: Wed Aug 29 18:14:11 2007
New Revision: 571006
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=571006view=rev
Log:
Remove source for mod_proxy_ajp that moved to httpd some time ago.
Why the hell did you do that?
You could copy it to some sandbox or
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
You could copy it to some sandbox or something, since there is
lots of usable code in there like console mode httpd API client
for testing modules, etc.
It's trivial to
svn cp -r 571005 https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/connectors/trunk/ajp
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Match header names exactly against pre defined constants.
p += 6;
-if (memcmp(p, CHARSET, 7) == 0)
+if (strcmp(p, CHARSET) == 0)
Someone would say that this is over engineering :)
memcmp *is always* faster
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Match header names exactly against pre defined constants.
p += 6;
-if (memcmp(p, CHARSET, 7) == 0)
+if (strcmp(p, CHARSET) == 0)
Someone would say that this is over engineering :)
memcmp
Rainer Jung wrote:
No problem, better safe than sorry.
Right. It seems I always forget the ingenuity of the users
that wish to extent the http spec :)
However, I think that we can still use the memcmp
with xxx\0. That would still be faster then figuring out the EOL with strcmp?
Regards,
Rainer Jung wrote:
Yes Mladen, I know. But we never really use len :) I know, that we can
do it with memcmp, but then you, me or someone else has to add a couple
of if(len=...) before each memcmp(). Go ahead if you like to.
Look, we have a local header[16] on which we copy toupper, and
Rainer Jung wrote:
+/* Always do memcmp including the final \0-termination character.
+ */
switch (header[0]) {
case 'A':
-if (memcmp(p, CCEPT, 5) == 0) {
+if (memcmp(p, CCEPT, 6) == 0) {
Right, but like said this should be a
if
Mark Thomas wrote:
Hi,
Following on from my previous over eager attempt to clean up the
duplicate code in connectors I would like to propose the following
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/CHANGES
- remove connectors/trunk/ajp/proxy
- move connectors/trunk/ajp/ajplib to connectors/trunk/ajplib
of the current code
inside Tomcat 6 trunk, and the majority of developers have agreed
to put the trunk into the sandbox.
Community
-
After last quarter's new committers and PMC members, there were no
changes the committership nor PMC membership this time.
Mladen Turk was elected as new
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Sep 2 15:50:40 2007
New Revision: 572181
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=572181view=rev
Log:
- Document return codes of the service() method for
all worker types (lb still missing).
Below is for jk_ajp_common.c:
- Document return codes
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
I'm fine with rolling back and committing in steps.
No need to do that. Let's just take more care in the future.
It'll be much easier to follow the commits thought.
Regards,
Mladen
-
To
Mark Thomas wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
I propose we create connectors/sanbox and move the
trunk/ajp/* code in there.
ajp/proxy code can be removed of course.
Could we just move it to tomcat/sandbox as that already exists?
We need connectors/sandbox anyway, so IMHO it's a good
initial reason
Henri Gomez wrote:
Well what's the consensus on Java projects, like Xerces, Xalan or Lucene ?
It doesn't mater how other project do things. It's irrelevant.
We had CTR policy till now and it was working.
Now we have a new situation with different developers POVs,
and cause of that, this
Yoav Shapira wrote:
Hi,
On 9/6/07, Mladen Turk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do we need it? Yes, if we wish to survive as a project.
It's pain in the ass, I know, but IMHO it's also the only
way to get some sense in this chaos.
I disagree. I think the current CTR policy has worked just fine
Remy Maucherat wrote:
To give an idea, tis could mean:
- API changing patches (any protected or above signature change)
- code changes in the critical path (for example, code which gets
executed on each HTTP request)
Fine.
- any other commit for which a committer asks for the RTC procedure
Beat Fluri wrote:
Hi,
As a member of the Software Engineering group of the University Zurich,
Switzerland, I'm investigating the evolution of software systems. For
this, I'd like to use Tomcat as a case study. Unfortunately, our tools
are limited to CVS and not yet fully adapted to
Bill Barker wrote:
Now, I'd prefer that TC is just the Servlet/JSP container
that it is meant to be, and not try to add on proprietary features. But
that is just me ;).
You are not the only one ;)
Seems we have lost the clear vision of the project somewhere
in the flame wars.
It has
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
This simply has to stop.
taking trunk away, this turn of events is expected. I wish everyone
would have thought of that before we got caught up in the personal, and
not what is important, trunk debate.
I did, as well others did (I hope
+1 as well.
Seems we have come to some sort of conclusion.
(At least the proposal holds the majority of votes)
I'll left this tread for a day or two and then create
an official proposal draft we can vote on.
If thats accepted, I'll create needed documents like
STATUS, ROADMAP containing that
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Hey folks,
as you provide the bindings to the JSSE, even though you don't
ship the JSSE .jars - we still need Tomcat in compliance with the
federal export notification policies. I know you did some work on
this in the past, but please see
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
it's sort of a closed loop problem. Update the info, allow the usual
one hour after updating from minotaur to sync, and then shoot out the
notice referencing the list of notices sent :)
Can we get an example email that needs to be send and an email
address? The
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote:
it's sort of a closed loop problem. Update the info, allow the usual
one hour after updating from minotaur to sync, and then shoot out the
notice referencing the list of notices sent :)
Can we get an example email
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
(I've heard this list is a good place to discuss mod_jk code; please
redirect me and accept my apologies if it is not.)
No, this is correct place :)
containers. By adding some additional instrumentation to the code, I
can see that each AJP packet is constructed
Henri Gomez wrote:
Here is the dump
You should know by now that apache mailing doesn't
allow large attachments, zip files, etc... :)
Put a link somewhere
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
I don't know if this is intended behavior, or a bug in mod_jk, or even a
bug in Apache, but something seems amiss. Thoughts?
Your patch won't work.
The real problem is in the initialization for vhosts where
when there is *any* Jk directive the create_jk_config is
Ian Ward Comfort wrote:
clone_jk_config is bogus, and doesn't behave like it should
(copy only the basic data and no mounts)
Was this function introduced since 1.2.25?
Yes, I was talking about trunk not 1.2.25
Regards,
Mladen
According to the release process, the 6.0.15 tag is:
[ ] Broken
[ ] Alpha
[ ] Beta
[X] Stable
Thumbs up for Linux, win32 and win64!
Regards,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sun Nov 11 11:22:23 2007
New Revision: 593943
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=593943view=rev
Log:
Undo revision 593927.
This produced a mem leak for vhosts with private JkMounts.
No idea why.
Because uw_map is now allocated *only* if
Rainer Jung wrote:
P.S.: I hope the other changes are fine with you?
They look OK, but I'll double check, just in case ;)
Cheers,
Mladen
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL
Mladen Turk wrote:
Rainer Jung wrote:
But I'm open. If we remove the const, we also need to remove it for
the log_fmt (got as compiler warning also there, but don't have the
line number at hand).
Which would you prefer? Do you see a problem with the const, like
wrong compiler optimization
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: jim
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java
URL:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/tomcat/util/net/AprEndpoint.java?rev=596761r1=596760r2=596761view=diff
RafaQuiM wrote:
Hello,
I'm having problems using the TomcatMonitor (tomcat4w.exe) when trying to
access a WinXp net file from a Servlet due to the console uses the SYTEM
user (user.name property) as credentials.
Does anybody know how to configure tomcatMonitor in order to use the logged
user?
On 12/16/2011 08:56 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
All,
I know option 1 works ...
Does anyone else have any requirements / views that would suggest one
approach is better than the other?
If it ain't broken don't fix it.
Regards
--
^TM
On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
I simply cannot understand why some folks have
almost religious fascination with Maven.
I know many projects that have move from Ant to
Maven and are now either switched back or gone to
some
On 12/19/2011 06:12 PM, Pid wrote:
On 18/12/2011 08:37, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/17/2011 09:24 PM, Antonio Petrelli wrote:
As requested here is a proposal to move to Maven.
I simply cannot understand why some folks have
almost religious fascination with Maven.
I know many projects
On 12/19/2011 07:04 PM, Henri Gomez wrote:
Exactly. Since any change would require a learning curve
and it seems we don't have that many (read none) maven
experts in the house, Gradle could be equally considered,
given that it seems more advanced in customization.
I know well Maven but Olivier
On 12/19/2011 07:47 PM, David Jencks wrote:
Are you reading the thread? I mentioned dec 17 that geronimo has been maintaining a
script for 2+ years that pulls tomcat source out of tomcat svn and puts it in an
appropriately structured maven mutli-project build and we've been re-releasing quite
On 12/19/2011 08:58 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
There is a big part of tomcat which doesn't need maven because it doesn't
need to be standard (the installers are a great example).
Installer is just ant exec task with some filtering
for getting the versions correctly.
We have multiple
On 12/19/2011 09:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
I don't know if it is because i used more maven than ant but when i checked
out tomcat the first time i wondered where was modules (corresponding to
jars).
OK, this is the first thing I can agree with you. But It has nothing
to do with toolkit
On 12/19/2011 09:13 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
because developers can't know both?
Since it seems you are familiar with maven, what is your
opinion about maven ant tasks?
Seems to me it offers full power of Ant, almost seamless
transition, with the option to use maven deploy and
On 12/21/2011 09:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
We must at least create 7.1.x branch for such a crucial change.
Otherwise no one will be able to apply custom patches to the exiting code base.
BTW, Oliver, it looks really
On 12/21/2011 10:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/12/2011 21:21, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 12/21/2011 09:34 PM, Olivier Lamy wrote:
Hello,
I have started some stuff here: https://github.com/olamy/tomcat70.
We must at least create 7.1.x branch for such a crucial change.
I'm not sure we need
On 12/21/2011 11:01 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 21/12/2011 21:57, Mladen Turk wrote:
In essence no packages will be able to change the version
unless he rewrites the .spec or debian files from scratch thought.
Ouch. That is argument for only doing this in trunk, if we do it at all.
Right. Up
On 01/24/2012 10:15 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
I have made some further headway with this and the latest patch is on
people.a.o [1].
How that relates to Servlet spec 3.1?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 02/15/2012 04:53 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Uploaded another take.
For non-SSL ( JIO, and apr without ssl ) - SPDY just kicks in on all
connections,
this is just a short-cut for testing. I could also define a SpdyProtocol
and set it
directly on the connector - but seems too much overhead
On 02/17/2012 09:00 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 7.0.26 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Stable - go ahead and release as 7.0.26 Stable
Looks good ... nothing much to say :)
Regards
--
^TM
-
To
On 02/21/2012 03:06 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/21mt...@apache.org:
@@ -58,6 +70,13 @@ TCN_IMPLEMENT_CALL(jlong, Address, info)
sl = sa;
}
}
+if (sp) {
+/* Set the provided scope id
+ * APR lack the api for setting this directly so lets
On 02/21/2012 03:06 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/21mt...@apache.org:
I wonder when this change will be ported to native/trunk. (Just
wondering. No real interest though).
We currently have only 1.x release which is from this branch.
Trunk will be 2.x and will require apr-2.x
I plan to
Hi,
We have couple of bugs fixed and its been quite a while since 1.1.22.
There is also few trivial bugs and patches in BZ which I plan to solve.
I volunteer as RM for 1.1.23.
Objections, comments?
Regards
--
^TM
-
To
On 02/21/2012 09:56 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 12:51 PM, Rainer Jungrainer.j...@kippdata.dewrote:
On 21.02.2012 21:30, Costin Manolache wrote:
Is this going to be from head ? How can I get the NPN ( sslext.c )
included
?
Mladen is aiming for 1.1.23, so he will be
On 02/22/2012 06:17 AM, Costin Manolache wrote:
Mladen: please let me know if you want to further review the change or
should I merge it to the branch.
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
It would be a bit weird to have 1.1.22 as is, and 1.1.23 with
whole bunch of new
On 02/22/2012 05:52 AM, cos...@apache.org wrote:
Author: costin
+ if (len TCN_BUFFER_SZ) {
+ return -1;
+ }
Suppose that the len is presumed to always be shorter then 8K.
char * requestedTicket = apr_pcalloc(tcssl-pool, len);
suppose this can be be just
On 02/22/2012 03:54 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 11:11 PM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
Well I personally would not merge that into 1.1.x branch.
It would be a bit weird to have 1.1.22 as is, and 1.1.23 with
whole bunch of new features and API's.
That's not why
On 02/22/2012 05:47 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 8:13 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
One thing I would appreciate help with: I would like to have an option to
statically link
openssl and apr into the tc-native .so - I mean use openssl.a, apr.a.
You mean for
On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
However, not sure why you wish to do that. Many distros already provide
tomcat-native so there's no real point for doing that, especially since
we should not distribute unix
On 02/23/2012 08:00 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/23ma...@apache.org:
Maybe:
while [ -n $1 ]
(though both variants should work work)
Some solaris shells misbehave on -n.
do
- case $o in
+ case $o=1 in
What the above line is about?
Was it supposed to be:
case $1 in
On 02/22/2012 07:22 PM, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
I'm trying to provide a way for people to build libtcnative-2.so so it
can be installed on
those systems along with the existing apr, openssl and libtcnative-1,
without
On 02/24/2012 10:07 AM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
Hi!
Thanks to Stefan Bodewig work to resolve issue with expat
configuration on Gump,
APR now builds successfully there, after failing for more than 1 year.
So projects that depend on APR and/or HTTPD now have a chance to be built,
after being
On 02/24/2012 11:12 AM, Henri Gomez wrote:
I just notice this 'release'
Did you release a source tarball ?
Nope, will tag later today or over the weekend (depends on weather conditions :)
Cheers
--
^TM
-
To unsubscribe,
On 02/24/2012 06:31 PM, Felix Schumacher wrote:
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2012, 07:43 + schrieb mt...@apache.org:
+AC_ARG_ENABLE(ocsp,
+[AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-openssl],[Turn on OpenSSL OCSP verification
support])],
I think the help string should read --enable-ocsp.
Right.
Good catch!
Hi,
I have made available soon to be 1.1.23 release at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293352/
So please test before I make tag.
Notice
--
There is one change in distribution layout.
There is no more binaries/win32/ with individual files.
Instead there is
On 02/24/2012 07:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I have made available soon to be 1.1.23 release at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293352/
Please use:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293383/
Inside binaries there is now win32-bin.zip and win32-ocsp.zip
with the latest
On 02/26/2012 03:39 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 24.02.2012 20:33, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/24/2012 07:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I have made available soon to be 1.1.23 release at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293352/
Please use:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293383
On 02/26/2012 04:19 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mladen,
On 24.02.2012 20:33, Mladen Turk wrote:
On 02/24/2012 07:15 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Hi,
I have made available soon to be 1.1.23 release at
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293352/
Please use:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk
On 02/24/2012 08:33 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Please use:
http://people.apache.org/~mturk/native/r1293383/
Inside binaries there is now win32-bin.zip and win32-ocsp.zip
with the latest having OCSP compiled in (still experimental)
The versions in r1293352 had OCSP compiled in so not for production
On 02/26/2012 04:58 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 24.02.2012 13:09, mt...@apache.org wrote:
JKJNISVN=$SVNBASE/${JKJNIEXT}
if [ x$JKJNIEXT = xtrunk ]; then
- JKJNIVER=`svn info ${JKJNISVN} | awk '$1 == Revision: {print $2}'`
-elif [ $USE_BRANCH -eq 1 ]; then
- JKJNIBRANCH=${JKJNIEXT}
-
On 02/27/2012 08:19 PM, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2012/2/27mt...@apache.org:
Author: mturk
Date: Mon Feb 27 18:56:02 2012
New Revision: 1294273
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1294273view=rev
Log:
Make some sense out of README. Removed ASL header and added Crypto notice
Why are you
Version 1.1.23 is both bugfix release with couple of additional features
that does not change ABI (namely OCSP and pkcs12 support).
The proposed release artefacts can be found at [1],
and the build was done using tag [2].
Please vote. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Apache Tomcat
On 02/27/2012 12:33 AM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
OK. Artefacts re-staged at
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachetomcat-084/
+1
Signatures and content OK.
Although not sure why you have LICENSE and LICENSE.txt as well
as NOTICE and NOTICE.txt with the same content
(well,
On 02/28/2012 08:57 PM, sebb wrote:
On 28 February 2012 16:43, Mladen Turkmt...@apache.org wrote:
Although not sure why you have LICENSE and LICENSE.txt as well
as NOTICE and NOTICE.txt with the same content
That is probably caused by the Apache POM, which tries to be helpful
by adding the
With my implicit +1 we 4 +1's (Henri, Filip, Jean-Frederic and I)
and no other votes. I declare vote as passed.
On 02/28/2012 03:39 PM, Mladen Turk wrote:
Version 1.1.23 is both bugfix release with couple of additional features
that does not change ABI (namely OCSP and pkcs12 support
The Apache Tomcat team announces the immediate availability of Apache
Tomcat Native 1.1.23 stable.
Please refer to the change log for the list of changes:
http://tomcat.apache.org/native-doc/miscellaneous/changelog.html
Downloads:
http://tomcat.apache.org/download-native.cgi
Please allow up to
On 03/03/2012 03:41 PM, rj...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rjung
Date: Sat Mar 3 14:41:12 2012
New Revision: 1296630
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1296630view=rev
Log:
BZ 52793: Fix default value of forwarded worker
activation state.
Think we've been holding 1.2.33 for a quite time.
I
801 - 900 of 1171 matches
Mail list logo
