k the decision must now be made
> to either start it immediately (with a volunteer ) or pass on it
> and freeze AJP for good."
>
> and Chris postet:
>
> "It might be time to let AJP die."
>
> Maybe a dev list discussion about plans for AJP should happ
Hi Martin,
Am 05.07.2018 um 17:40 schrieb Martin Knoblauch:
Hi Rainer,
chiming in late... SSL support on the connector between loadbalancer and
Tomcat is something that is requested from time to time. Usually from
over-conscious security types.
We are using mod_jk today, because of:
1) we
r pass on it and freeze AJP for good."
>
> and Chris postet:
>
> "It might be time to let AJP die."
>
> Maybe a dev list discussion about plans for AJP should happen. I heard
> several people interested in getting TLS support for mod_jk. Whenever I was
> thinking about it
On 27/06/18 18:09, Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/06/18 17:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
>> So what do people think about:
>>
>> 1) adding a statement to the mod_jk docs, that we don't plan any feature
>> enhancements and suggest users to migrate to mod_proxy_http and the TC
>> HTTP connectors (but what
On 6/27/2018 1:02 PM, Rainer Jung wrote:
Not trying to deviate, but any header set with mod_headers
RequestHeader directive should automatically be forwarded (I use it
often eg. for request IDs). Alternatively one can use JkEnvVar to
forward httpd request environment variables as request
Am 27.06.2018 um 21:49 schrieb Igal Sapir:
On 6/27/2018 11:28 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:09 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/06/18 17:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
Since encryption would be most of the most useful features and IMHO we
won't get there, I suggest we discuss
On 6/27/2018 11:28 AM, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:09 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
On 27/06/18 17:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
Since encryption would be most of the most useful features and IMHO we
won't get there, I suggest we discuss deprecation and EOL dates for AJP
- meaning
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:09 PM Mark Thomas wrote:
> On 27/06/18 17:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
> > Since encryption would be most of the most useful features and IMHO we
> > won't get there, I suggest we discuss deprecation and EOL dates for AJP
> > - meaning mod_jk and AJP connectors.
>
> +1
>
> >
On 27/06/18 17:50, Rainer Jung wrote:
> Since encryption would be most of the most useful features and IMHO we
> won't get there, I suggest we discuss deprecation and EOL dates for AJP
> - meaning mod_jk and AJP connectors.
+1
> There's no need to rush, but there could be a clear statement, that
and Chris postet:
"It might be time to let AJP die."
Maybe a dev list discussion about plans for AJP should happen. I heard
several people interested in getting TLS support for mod_jk. Whenever I
was thinking about it, I refrained from starting to work on it, because
- good TLS supp
10 matches
Mail list logo
