I see what you mean now - As shade only works at the 'package' phase there is
no way round this other than to use your approach - An external project
dependency. Dammit
Andy
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p4666717.html
Sent from
You need to enable the 'main' profile in the maven projects view, then the
whole world comes in to say hello (takes a while even on a fast machine).
Also enable automatic imports in the intellij maven settings.
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz
So how would we feel with 'openejb-shade-[quartz]' ? And eventually bring all
shade jars in line with that naming?
I'm happy to do the maven stuff either way.
Andy
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p486.html
Sent from the OpenEJB
I agree. Just checked in for a build something that works for me - We can
rename stuff later.
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p488.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
that works for me - We can
rename stuff later.
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p488.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
On Dec 10, 2013, at 2:40 PM, David Blevins david.blev...@gmail.com wrote:
As far as where the shaded project lives, I'm cool with whatever as long as
it doesn't:
- break Intellij so we can still compile with a plain Intellij import and not
having to go through any magic to compile/run
at build time when we deploy to
either a snapshot or release repo.
Moving it out of the project completely is IMHO not the way to go as it
complicates the build/deploy and release even more.
Andy.
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next
/rmannibucau
2013/12/10 AndyG andy.gumbre...@orprovision.com:
And renaming to openejb-quartz-shade would make sense i.e. produce
openejb-quartz-shade-4.6.1-SNAPSHOT.jar
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p451.html
Sent from the OpenEJB
(i.e. All openejb jars together)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p456.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
listing
(i.e. All openejb jars together)
--
View this message in context:
http://openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Quartz-next-tp4666498p456.html
Sent from the OpenEJB Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
david.blev...@gmail.com
To: dev@tomee.apache.org
Sent: Thursday, 5 December 2013, 2:38
Subject: Re: Quartz, next
Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting.
There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and
test the heck out of it.
-David
On Dec 3
: Quartz, next
Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting.
There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and
test the heck out of it.
-David
On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade
But, the main objective of shading is to let users embed their own Quartz
if I understood without interfering with TomEE internals.
So if they embed it, where is the issue? They gonna be able to
extend/implement whatever they want to.
JLouis
2013/12/3 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
But no more the tomee one without copying code. (once again not blocking)
Le 4 déc. 2013 09:35, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO jeano...@gmail.com a écrit :
But, the main objective of shading is to let users embed their own Quartz
if I understood without interfering with TomEE internals.
So if they embed
Trying the shaded approach would certainly be interesting.
There's a lot of merit to it if we can work through the obvious issues and test
the heck out of it.
-David
On Dec 3, 2013, at 12:57 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com wrote:
Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in
Ps: forgot another solutuon: shade quartz in org.apache.openejb.quartz
Le 2 déc. 2013 22:23, Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com a écrit :
Hi
How do we handle quartz for next releases? It is very often a pain
I propose:
1) if in openejb loader use this one
2) if not look for it in
16 matches
Mail list logo