Re: Removing Toree specific support for Python and R

+1 On Tue, Sep 25, 2018, 13:10 Marius van Niekerk wrote: > +1 > > This would simplify usage, and remove a large class of python questions and > confusion on our mailing list. Several users assume that our R and Python > featureset has parity with the primary kernels. > > On Tue, 25 Sep 2018 at

Re: Speeding up Toree Startup

time and potentially reduce code complexity by removing the actor system since there really is no need for it. This would be a major refactor though. I would think we would want to have a more thorough discussion about this before we consider it. Kind Regards, Corey Stubbs On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 3:26

Re: Removing support for Scala 2.10

+1 as well On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 11:28 AM Ryan Blue wrote: > +1 > > On Mon, Nov 6, 2017 at 6:04 AM, Marius van Niekerk < > marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I don't think that the current support for 2.10 in master even works > > reliably. Remove it as it

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.2.0 RC1

+1 On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 5:54 PM Marius van Niekerk < marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Ran some tests using mybinder.org > > > > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2017 at 23:08 Luciano Resende wrote: > > > Here is my +1 > > > > Would others please help review the release

Re: CI Builds

I know there have been flaky tests in the past due to testing akka actors and dealing with the concurrency for those classes. My best guess is that current issues relate to similar timing issues. It might be worth having some record of all the test runs so we can see which ones are consistently.

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC6

+1 Ran and installed the pip dist with Apache Spark 1.6.3. On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 11:24 AM Marius van Niekerk < marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 > > Going to +1 this since I assisted with getting rid of some of the bundled > pieces that were blocking for RC5. > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2017,

Re: Development model

Sounds good. Kind Regards, Corey Stubbs On Thu, Feb 2, 2017 at 9:50 AM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > I am not suggesting doing "everything" via SBT, just the basic compile, > test, build and package so that contributors used to other sbt based >

Re: Toree client programming model

=>{ ... }).onSuccess(Option(executeResult) => { ... }).onStream(streamResult => { ... }) Key thing being the optional execute result as a parameter to onSuccess. This would be a better interface to handle when there are/are not results from an execution. Kind Regards, Corey Stubbs On Tu

Re: Development model

My typical development flow is to write code, run pip-release , and then install the pip release locally on my machine (pip install dist/toree-pip/pip-release; jupyter toree install), and test changes with the install. +1 on working on documenting the make targets. In terms of getting everything

Re: Publishing Toree snapshots ?

We do not publish the uber jar, but there is a target to generate it. You can run "make build" and this will generate the assembly jar in target/scala-$(SCALA_VERSION) . Kind Regards, Corey Stubbs On Fri, Jan 13, 2017 at 1:20 PM Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC4

+1 On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 9:42 AM Gino Bustelo wrote: > +1 > > I created a simple target in our Makefile to test a release. Pass the URL > to the pip package and it will install it on jupyter inside a docker > container. I tested using that and ran a notebook. It all worked.

Re: Should we start another release vote?

+1 On Thu, Jan 5, 2017 at 12:31 PM Marius van Niekerk < marius.v.niek...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 looks good to me. Just some SBT changes > > On Thu, Jan 5, 2017, 08:08 Luciano Resende wrote: > > > + 1 > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 6:12 AM Chip Senkbeil

Re: [VOTE] Apache Toree 0.1.0 RC2

+1 Release this package as Apache Toree 0.1.0 On Tue, Oct 11, 2016 at 2:16 PM Gino Bustelo wrote: > Please vote to approve the release of the following candidate as > Apache Toree version 0.1.0 > > > The commit to be voted on is 119bf3e2d1d16986f55802cf2323e8629ea25ef8 > < >

Re: Error For Toree Site Repo svn ci

/index.html' is forbidden by the server svn: E175013: Access to '/repos/asf/!svn/txr/1748457-12dpf/incubator/toree/site/index.html' forbidden On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 8:51 AM Corey Stubbs <cas5...@gmail.com> wrote: > Luciano, > I was using HTTPS. Switched over to > http://svn.apache.org/repo

Re: Help from Mentors

I found this article explaining podling releases. It appears we should our own directory, under http://www.apache.org/dist/incubator/, to distribute our releases. This seems

Re: April Update

I believe "Magics are not implemented using plug-in framework" should read "Magics are now implemented using plug-in framework" On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 1:59 PM Gino Bustelo wrote: > Last month can be found http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/March2016. > Here is the draft for

Re: [jira] [Commented] (TOREE-280) PYTHON_PATH Needs To Be Configured At Install

Yavuz, I agree adding more options is not in the best interest of the users. +1 to the idea of looking at what is in the Spark distribution. Will update the jira description to reflect that idea. On Mar 18, 2016 5:15 PM, "Yavuz Nuzumlali (JIRA)" wrote: > > [ >

Re: Issue Tracker not available

hen others got their accounts set up and the > only > > one I haven't seen is Miao Wang. > > > > > He said he submit, but maybe he is having the same issue with corporate > emails being flagged as span. > > > > On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 5:50 PM Luciano Resende &

Re: Issue Tracker not available

Everything seems to have imported correctly. And +1 on all PMC members should have access to the project JIRA. On Mon, Jan 18, 2016 at 9:58 AM Chip Senkbeil wrote: > What feedback were you wanting on the infrastructure jira? It looks like > the issues imported fine,