Re: license details

The Apache release guide is pretty reluctant about putting things into NOTICE because it places dependencies on downstream components. We for sure need a NOTICE entry for max mind, but I think most other packages are AL or MIT which don't require attribution. Rather, I think we need to

license details

Hi all, I'm looking at files that are missing license details per Leif's email from earlier today. I'm finding that some aren't clear. For instance, it appears that some files in `docs/source/_themes/sphinx_rtd_theme` have a statement like this: > :copyright: Copyright 2007-2013 by

[GitHub] incubator-trafficcontrol pull request #67: adds bool migration for goose_db_...

GitHub user mitchell852 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/67 adds bool migration for goose_db_version.is_applied field You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running: $ git pull

[GitHub] incubator-trafficcontrol pull request #43: TC-18: Ds client ds update

Github user asfgit closed the pull request at: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/43 --- If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature enabled and wishes so, or if

[GitHub] incubator-trafficcontrol pull request #66: Fix psql migration to convert the...

GitHub user mitchell852 opened a pull request: https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/pull/66 Fix psql migration to convert the right stuff to bools and leave other stuff alone pgloader converts all tinyints to smallints but some of these need to be converted to bools

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

ok -- tarball and armored signatures are now included in https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/trafficcontrol/1.8.0/RC1/ . Adding that to the instructions for future release mgrs... I'll work on getting the NOTICE updated and creating a KEYS file as well.Once those are done,

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

> On Nov 8, 2016, at 6:46 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) > wrote: > > Hey Dan- > I haven’t looked at the RPMs yet, but I think we also need to put up a > package for astats. > > A few other things: > - Package name should have “incubating” in it > - Need signatures

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

Thanks for looking at that, Leif.. I'm sure we have a few more details to get right.. I'm pretty sure most of those are from external sources, so need to be added to NOTICE.. -Dan On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Leif Hedstrom wrote: > >> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

Thanks, Dave.. should the tarball include the git revision ids and RC1 as well? traffic_control_incubating-1.8.0-4549.bebf63ee-RC1.tar.gz Dan On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 10:14 AM, David Neuman wrote: > I think we need to include a source tarball that contains the project

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

> On Nov 8, 2016, at 3:27 PM, Dan Kirkwood wrote: > > Hello All, > > I've prepared a release for v1.8.0 (RC1) > > Changes since 1.7.0: > https://github.com/apache/incubator-trafficcontrol/compare/RELEASE-1.7.0...RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1 > >

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

I think we need to include a source tarball that contains the project name and "incubating" (e.g. traffic_control_incubating_1.8.0_source.tar.gz). We can also include the RPMs but we should note that they are for convenience only and therefore they shouldnt need incubating in the name. On Wed,

Re: [VOTE] Traffic Control RELEASE-1.8.0-RC1

Thanks, Eric.. I'll get the signatures in there, too and look into astats.. Suggestions on the form of the package name? e.g. traffic_ops-incubator-1.8.0-RC1-..x86_64.rpm ? -dan On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 6:46 PM, Eric Friedrich (efriedri) wrote: > Hey Dan- > I