To be clear, "immutable" here means the IP could not be removed, but allow
modification.
And streaming "priority" is better be Delivery Service based than server based.
Thanks,
Zhilin
On 10/04/2018, 4:12 PM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh...@cisco.com>
est ID
- Server "PUT" will allow empty IP, but if IP is set, it verify there is
exactly 1 IP record for the server, and work against it. O.w. fails.
Another option can be to have a global param that enables multiple IPs per
server. When enabled, API changes - IP i
ent
> hash. A
> > > server is in the selection group only if one of its interfaces is
found
> > to
> > > be healthy
> > > 1. Once we have server selected, select an interface out of all
> > interfaces
> > > of the server with max ava
Updated the DB schema in section 3.1.1.4
Thanks,
Zhilin
On 04/04/2018, 11:02 AM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote:
Good points. I am happy to make this change in the design doc.
Thanks,
Zhilin
On 03/04/2018, 8:17 PM, "Eri
n Apr 3, 2018, at 2:00 AM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <zhilh...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> I could not find the edit button on this page. Looks like I do not have
the authority to add the doc.
>
> Thanks,
> Zhilin
>
the same
cache.
—Eric
> On Apr 3, 2018, at 2:42 AM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <zhilh...@cisco.com>
wrote:
>
> Hi Mark,
>
> Thanks for your comments. Please check my reply in another thread:
>
> If we a
ot; in your example,)
>
>
> Additionally, it is not clear to me what happens if one of the interfaces
> fails?
> Does every interface has a unique DNS name? If an interface fails, are
> redirects
> sent only to the available (secondary) interfaces?
>
>
; - IPv6
> - IPv4
> - Priority (Integer as flexible as you wish: e.g. "1" for "secondary",
> "2" for "primary" in your example,)
>
>
> Additionally, it is not clear to me what happens if one of the inter
wiki? I create a design
docs page here (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TC/Design+Docs).
I think it would be good to get the document there so it doesn't get lost
over time.
Thanks!
Dave
On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <
Hi Guys,
This was originally posted in another discussion. Resend this in a standalone
topic to catch more awareness. The link for the design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vgq-pGNoLLYf7Y3cu5hWu67TUKpN5hucrp-ZS9nSsd4/edit?usp=sharing
Short summary for the feature design:
---
There is
Hi Guys,
Thanks a lot for the discussion. I should put the design earlier for review,
and sorry for the delay. Here is the link for the design doc:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vgq-pGNoLLYf7Y3cu5hWu67TUKpN5hucrp-ZS9nSsd4/edit?usp=sharing
Short summary for the feature design:
---
There is
t to Traffic Ops? I think that's something that we need to
support.
Thanks,
Dave
On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <zhilh...@cisco.com
> wrote:
> Hey Dave,
>
> Yes, it is much clearer
lps? If not, let me know.
Thanks,
Dave
On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <
zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote:
> BTW, would you mind to give an example on how you are using HOST_REGEXP >
> 0 in your production?
>
BTW, would you mind to give an example on how you are using HOST_REGEXP > 0 in
your production?
We thought HOST_REGEXP > 0 should be very similar to HOST_REGEXP = 0, but
sounds like it is not the case.
Thanks,
Zhilin
On 8/30/17, 12:46 PM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh.
9 AM, Dave Neuman <neu...@apache.org> wrote:
> Hi Zhilin,
> Sorry for not responding sooner.
>
> I answered your questions inline below. Let me know what other questions
> you have.
>
> Thanks,
> Dave
>
> On Mon, Aug
Hmm, no response…
I think I should suppose no one is using multiple subdomains in production.
Please response if I am wrong.
Thanks,
Zhilin
On 8/25/17, 3:12 PM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote:
Hi folks,
The multiple subdomain (HOST_REGEXP) l
Hi folks,
The multiple subdomain (HOST_REGEXP) looks not working in TC version we are
using. However, after checking the code in latest master branch, I would
suspect if this is fully supported:
1. Based on the code, Traffic Router may not fully support HOST_REGEXP with
“set_number” not equal
ot; <efrie...@cisco.com> wrote:
Thanks Zhilin-
Could I use a domain of just “topdomain-cdn.com” or does it require a
minimum of three levels?
Is configuration just in delivery service or does the domain_name parameter
need to be modified too?
> On Jun 21, 2017, at 4:
Hi all,
I am working on a feature to support custom delivery service domain.
Currently in traffic ops, you can configure a “HOST_REGEXP” for a delivery
service with pattern like:
1) .*\.my-subdomain\..*
2) my-subdomain.topdomain.com
I think pattern 1) is well known by all of us. However
19 matches
Mail list logo