Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

To be clear, "immutable" here means the IP could not be removed, but allow modification. And streaming "priority" is better be Delivery Service based than server based. Thanks, Zhilin On 10/04/2018, 4:12 PM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh...@cisco.com>

Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

est ID - Server "PUT" will allow empty IP, but if IP is set, it verify there is exactly 1 IP record for the server, and work against it. O.w. fails. Another option can be to have a global param that enables multiple IPs per server. When enabled, API changes - IP i

Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

ent > hash. A > > > server is in the selection group only if one of its interfaces is found > > to > > > be healthy > > > 1. Once we have server selected, select an interface out of all > > interfaces > > > of the server with max ava

Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

Updated the DB schema in section 3.1.1.4 Thanks, Zhilin On 04/04/2018, 11:02 AM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote: Good points. I am happy to make this change in the design doc. Thanks, Zhilin On 03/04/2018, 8:17 PM, "Eri

Re: Question about the poll model of the Traffic Monitor

n Apr 3, 2018, at 2:00 AM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > I could not find the edit button on this page. Looks like I do not have the authority to add the doc. > > Thanks, > Zhilin >

Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

the same cache. —Eric > On Apr 3, 2018, at 2:42 AM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote: > > Hi Mark, > > Thanks for your comments. Please check my reply in another thread: > > If we a

Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

ot; in your example,) > > > Additionally, it is not clear to me what happens if one of the interfaces > fails? > Does every interface has a unique DNS name? If an interface fails, are > redirects > sent only to the available (secondary) interfaces? > >

Re: Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

; - IPv6 > - IPv4 > - Priority (Integer as flexible as you wish: e.g. "1" for "secondary", > "2" for "primary" in your example,) > > > Additionally, it is not clear to me what happens if one of the inter

Re: Question about the poll model of the Traffic Monitor

wiki? I create a design docs page here (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TC/Design+Docs). I think it would be good to get the document there so it doesn't get lost over time. Thanks! Dave On Wed, Mar 28, 2018 at 10:41 PM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <

Traffic Server Secondary Streaming IPs Design

Hi Guys, This was originally posted in another discussion. Resend this in a standalone topic to catch more awareness. The link for the design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vgq-pGNoLLYf7Y3cu5hWu67TUKpN5hucrp-ZS9nSsd4/edit?usp=sharing Short summary for the feature design: --- There is

Re: Question about the poll model of the Traffic Monitor

Hi Guys, Thanks a lot for the discussion. I should put the design earlier for review, and sorry for the delay. Here is the link for the design doc: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1vgq-pGNoLLYf7Y3cu5hWu67TUKpN5hucrp-ZS9nSsd4/edit?usp=sharing Short summary for the feature design: --- There is

Re: Is multiple subdomains fully supported?

t to Traffic Ops? I think that's something that we need to support. Thanks, Dave On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:35 PM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) <zhilh...@cisco.com > wrote: > Hey Dave, > > Yes, it is much clearer

Re: Is multiple subdomains fully supported?

lps? If not, let me know. Thanks, Dave On Tue, Aug 29, 2017 at 10:52 PM, Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan) < zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote: > BTW, would you mind to give an example on how you are using HOST_REGEXP > > 0 in your production? >

Re: Is multiple subdomains fully supported?

BTW, would you mind to give an example on how you are using HOST_REGEXP > 0 in your production? We thought HOST_REGEXP > 0 should be very similar to HOST_REGEXP = 0, but sounds like it is not the case. Thanks, Zhilin On 8/30/17, 12:46 PM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh.

Re: Is multiple subdomains fully supported?

9 AM, Dave Neuman <neu...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Zhilin, > Sorry for not responding sooner. > > I answered your questions inline below. Let me know what other questions > you have. > > Thanks, > Dave > > On Mon, Aug

Re: Is multiple subdomains fully supported?

Hmm, no response… I think I should suppose no one is using multiple subdomains in production. Please response if I am wrong. Thanks, Zhilin On 8/25/17, 3:12 PM, "Zhilin Huang (zhilhuan)" <zhilh...@cisco.com> wrote: Hi folks, The multiple subdomain (HOST_REGEXP) l

Is multiple subdomains fully supported?

Hi folks, The multiple subdomain (HOST_REGEXP) looks not working in TC version we are using. However, after checking the code in latest master branch, I would suspect if this is fully supported: 1. Based on the code, Traffic Router may not fully support HOST_REGEXP with “set_number” not equal

Re: Custom Delivery Service Domain Support

ot; <efrie...@cisco.com> wrote: Thanks Zhilin- Could I use a domain of just “topdomain-cdn.com” or does it require a minimum of three levels? Is configuration just in delivery service or does the domain_name parameter need to be modified too? > On Jun 21, 2017, at 4:

Custom Delivery Service Domain Support

Hi all, I am working on a feature to support custom delivery service domain. Currently in traffic ops, you can configure a “HOST_REGEXP” for a delivery service with pattern like: 1) .*\.my-subdomain\..* 2) my-subdomain.topdomain.com I think pattern 1) is well known by all of us. However