[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3890.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed at revision: 1213702
Port TUSCANY-2931 Allow
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3890?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3890.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I'm closing this issue now as TUSCANY-3654 has been resolved and the separate
Issue Type: Bug
Components: SCA Java Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.x
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
Priority: Minor
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.x
There is code in the BindingURIBuilder as follows
if (baseURI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3996:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Relative binding URIs not handled correctly when non-default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3993:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
otest pom.xml needs to point to apache snapshots repo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3996?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3996.
---
Resolution: Fixed
fixed at revision: 1212386
Relative binding URIs not handled
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3993?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3993.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed at revision: 1212399. Thanks for the suggested change Tom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3946.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I've had a bit of a change of heart about this one. I'm concerned that putting
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:46 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:22 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
ant elder
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:16 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 1:46 PM, ant elder antel...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com
wrote
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 7:24 AM, Florian Moga moga@gmail.com wrote:
Cool anniversary! Nice to know about it :)
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 6:16 AM, Nirmal Fernando nirmal070...@gmail.com
wrote:
Happy Birthday Tuscany!! :)
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 5:06 AM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com
I note that the TuscanyRuntime class allows properties to be passed in
to the constructor. Is there a reference/help somewhere that lists
what properties are supported?
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:33 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 2:22 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I note that the TuscanyRuntime class allows properties to be passed in
to the constructor. Is there a reference/help somewhere that lists
what
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 4:22 PM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Dec 8, 2011 at 10:57 AM, Simon Nash n...@apache.org wrote:
ant elder wrote:
This is good and i will have a go in 2.x to see if a similar approach
works there. But i can't help thinking its a slightly convoluted
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3965.
---
Resolution: Fixed
I've uploaded the updates OASIS JCI tests so I'm closing this issue now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13163524#comment-13163524
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3965:
-
At revision: 1210860 I added some more
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3988?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3988.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Greg's suggested fix applied at revision: 1210470. Thanks Greg. I added a test
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3916?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3916.
---
Resolution: Fixed
A while back at 1167202 the WSDL representation was changed for an internal
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3963:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
SCA client reference binding vaue should have special characters
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3963.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied at revision: 1209143. Thanks Jennifer.
SCA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13160082#comment-13160082
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3985:
-
To do this you have to manipulate the headers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3985?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13160091#comment-13160091
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3985:
-
This is the link I couldn't find
http
Hi Rashmi
comments in-line...
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 12:03 AM, Rashmi Hunt rashmih...@gmail.com wrote:
I like to understand in oasis, why user can not specify both wsdlElement
and uri for binding.ws?
For e.g to support SOAP over JMS, the reference binding could be defined as
reference
On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 9:01 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
Can I remove the file assembly-conformance-messages.properties [1]? I
don't think we use it any more. I'll remove it in a few days if no one
shouts.
Simon
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3924?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3924.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed
Inherited fields in service impl classes are treated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3966.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fixed
Duplicate message ID in contribution-validation
snip...
What happened to the async sample which tested this? It seems to be gone.
...snip
Not sure. I'll have a hunt for it an try and reinstate it. If we'RE
not running any void examples it's easy to believe that the code has
regressed.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3965:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
In a Service Implementation annotated with @Service, it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3965?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13138383#comment-13138383
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3965:
-
The discussion on the ML
(http://mail
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
snip...
What happened to the async sample which tested this? It seems to be gone.
...snip
Not sure. I'll have a hunt for it an try and reinstate it. If we'RE
not running any void examples it's easy to believe
Can I remove the file assembly-conformance-messages.properties [1]? I
don't think we use it any more. I'll remove it in a few days if no one
shouts.
Simon
[1]
The OASIS spec allows extension types such as bindings and
implementations to describe what intents they allwaysProvide and
mayProvide. There is a wrinkle here that there isn't a way to describe
which mayProvides intents are provided by default if no further
configuration is provided. For example,
In porting the JSR250 module from 1.x to 2.x I found an interesting
thing in the policy spec.
SCA policy annotations will only be processed when applied to
interface operations
JSR250 policy annotations will only be processed when applied to
implementation operations
I've reconstructed the code
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13130596#comment-13130596
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3962:
-
I don't think you're trying to do anything
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 2:42 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
Aren't binding builders run before the policy builder? If so, the binding
builder will have a hard time figuring out whether to add the default intent
because intents specified at higher levels (above the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13128722#comment-13128722
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3962:
-
Thanks for the example Glen.
It looks like
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 10:04 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe there is a bug in Tuscany code to read/write the QName value of
intents.
Maybe. I'll look into it.
Please note the SOAP_v1_2 should be under the oasis opencsa
Agreed.
namespace.
Thanks,
Raymond
Simon
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3959:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Intent matching is not performed for intents that may
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3958.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Code added at revision: 1185135 to serialize the Endpoint intents and policy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3959?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3959.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0
Change committed at revision: 1185139
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3900?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3900.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed at revision: 1185144. Thanks for the patch Greg
A heads up. I made some policy changes which I now notice have
uncovered some issue or other with our WSDL policy processing. In a
full build you'll see one policy compliance failure. Am looking into
it.
Simon
--
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
A heads up. I made some policy changes which I now notice have
uncovered some issue or other with our WSDL policy processing. In a
full build you'll see one policy compliance failure. Am looking into
it.
Simon
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Nguyen Van Chung.
nvchung...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi, Tuscany!
I'm having a problem when using Tuscany to call a webservice that is built
by a difference framework.
The error message is:
Exception in thread main org.osoa.sca.ServiceRuntimeException:
I've come across a problem that I'm sure we've seen before but I can't
put my finger on it.
Write a composite without wstx-asl on the classpath...
zdef2107778102:composite xmlns=
xmlns:zdef2107778102=http://docs.oasis-open.org/ns/opencsa/sca/200912;
target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3962?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13126434#comment-13126434
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3962:
-
In this case have you excluded some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3958?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3958:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Intents are not available for remote endpoints
Java Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
AFAICT we haven't ported over the JSR250 annotation support yet. There is a
complication here in that we must decide what to do with implementation
Components: SCA Java Runtime
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
The EndpointReferenceBuilderImpl uses this code when it's trying to decide if a
target is a domain target
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3960:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Port JSR250 annotation processing over from 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3960?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3960.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Port JSR250 annotation processing over from 1.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3961:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
EndpointReferenceBuilder relies on internal exception throwing
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3961?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3961.
---
Resolution: Fixed
EndpointReferenceBuilder relies on internal exception throwing
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Raymond Feng enjoyj...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Before the changes, we use jabsorb as the jsonrpc 1.0 implementation. I
decided to use a home grown for number of reasons:
1) The jsonrpc protocol is simple enough. I'm trying to avoid the dependency
to a non-active
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:01 AM, rf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Mon Oct 10 05:01:04 2011
New Revision: 1180780
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1180780view=rev
Log:
Use home-grown JSONRPC implementation
...snip
Hi Raymond
Just interested. What made you build a home
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3922?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3922.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applies back at r1158793 . Thanks for the patch Jennifer
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3945.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0
Fixed back at r1170998
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3943?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13124090#comment-13124090
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3943:
-
I've committed the patch Eric but it fails
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3887.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Looks like Brent committed this at r1140741
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 11:31 PM, Giorgio Zoppi giorgio.zo...@gmail.com wrote:
For embedded java and python are too much. .NET performs better, but
it is tight with Windows. It has a lot of dependencies, programmers
tends
to use introspection at runtime in the core. I know, Java is a tool
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3952:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
TransactionInterceptor ignores passed in phase
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
TransactionInterceptor gets a phase from the reference or service provider but
doesn't store it locally and hence it's not available to the InvocationChain
public class TransactionInterceptor implements
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3952?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3952.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed at r1175722
TransactionInterceptor ignores passed in phase
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
Reporter: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
This is somewhat aesthetic but you can't take the domain-node module without
taking the domain-hazelcast module even though it's just required for testing.
I'm planning to move those tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3953?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3953:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Break test dependecy between domain-node and domain-hazelcast
snip
1) Supporting different binding types for the request and callback
messages is currently not supported by Tuscany, should it be?
Not supporting this makes things much simpler so unless there is a
compelling use case for needing mixed bindings I'd like to say mixing
binding types is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3950:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Catch up with some changes in the OASIS SCA API classes
Components: OASIS Compliance - OASIS
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
Environment: All
Reporter: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
There are some differences between the Tuscany version of the SCA API
classes/annotations and the OASIS versions. It looks like most
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3950?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3950.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Updates to OASIS svn r286
Catch up with some changes in the OASIS SCA API
: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of Tuscany SCA In Action book: www.tuscanyinaction.com
Personal Web Site: www.enjoyjava.com
On Sep 20, 2011, at 3:40 AM, Simon Laws wrote:
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:55 PM, rf...@apache.org wrote:
Author
In local builds I'm seeing a number of failures. The first is in
itest/import-export
java.lang.IllegalStateException:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.ContributionResolveException:
org.apache.tuscany.sca.contribution.processor.ContributionResolveException:
Processing composite
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 11:55 PM, rf...@apache.org wrote:
Author: rfeng
Date: Mon Sep 19 22:55:37 2011
New Revision: 1172881
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=1172881view=rev
Log:
Add the ablity to load the contributions/composite for a given node
configuration without starting the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3949:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
AuthorizationPolicy is using the wrong namespace
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3948?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3948:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Support @Remotable on implementation class, reference field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3949.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0
Patch looks good Vijai although I did have
On Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 2:52 PM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
I stumbled upon one case where HeuristicPojoProcessor can cause this. In
visitEnd(), it tests separately whether an implementation has services,
references, or properties (as determined by previous
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3946:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Capability to skip setting TCCL in JavaImplementationInvoker.invoke
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3946?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13105986#comment-13105986
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3946:
-
I have a local change that, before setting
On Wed, Sep 14, 2011 at 1:10 AM, Greg Dritschler
greg.dritsch...@gmail.com wrote:
These questions have come up before, and in the past we've looked at the
Common Annotations for the Java Platform specification (aka JSR 250) for
guidance. The rules being proposed here appear to be in opposition
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3791:
Description:
There are some cases where a DOM node is accessed without synchronization
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3791:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Concurrent access to a DOM Node can result in and NPE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3791?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3791.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Changes were made a while back but I neglected to close the issue
Concurrent
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3937.
---
Resolution: Fixed
itest/properties added back into the build
Minor contribution towards making
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3945?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3945:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Expose RuntimeEndpointImpl.getPromotedComponent() as a public
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3937?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3937:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Minor contribution towards making testing/itest/properties pass
How should the databinding be configured for a non-JAXB Java bean?
Currently in 2.x I'm seeing that the data type that gets generated
does have a databinding set to java:complexType but the logical type
is set to the default XMLType, i.e. it has a null element name and a
null XSD type. In the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws updated TUSCANY-3940:
Fix Version/s: Java-SCA-2.0
Move to 2.0
Change AsyncJDKInvocationHandler to use WorkScheduler
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13103578#comment-13103578
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3940:
-
At revision: 1170137 I updated the JCAA
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3940?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3940.
---
Resolution: Fixed
exclude for 11017 now removed
Change AsyncJDKInvocationHandler to use
On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 11:18 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
How should the databinding be configured for a non-JAXB Java bean?
Currently in 2.x I'm seeing that the data type that gets generated
does have a databinding set to java:complexType but the logical type
is set
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws closed TUSCANY-3941.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Fix committed at r1169664
Reference with binding.sca uri=targetService may
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 5:09 PM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
As an alternative to writing out WSDL I'm wondering whether it will be
more effective/efficient to just write out our internal interface
model. I put code in to write out the WSDL and (most of it) is live in
the build
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13100176#comment-13100176
]
Simon Laws commented on TUSCANY-3941:
-
Sounds right Scott that if you specific
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3941?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3941:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Reference with binding.sca uri=targetService may be resolved
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 1:53 AM, Apache Jenkins Server
jenk...@builds.apache.org wrote:
See https://builds.apache.org/job/Tuscany-2x/346/changes
Changes:
[rfeng] Upgrade to jackson 1.8.5
[rfeng] Fix the Date format for json data binding
[slaws] Exclude sample html files from legal checks
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 11:17 AM, ant elder ant.el...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 7, 2011 at 8:54 AM, Simon Laws simonsl...@googlemail.com wrote:
I can't seem to get to the rat log file in Jenkins. Can someone point
me at the right place. Am rebuilding locally to reproduce.
Its at
https
As an alternative to writing out WSDL I'm wondering whether it will be
more effective/efficient to just write out our internal interface
model. I put code in to write out the WSDL and (most of it) is live in
the build again however It concerns we as we always end up generating
WSDL and, given the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3938?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Laws reassigned TUSCANY-3938:
---
Assignee: Simon Laws
Correct Tuscany module MANIFEST.MF files so that the runtime can
/browse/TUSCANY-3938
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Bug
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0-Beta3
Reporter: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
If you try loading the Tuscany runtime into OSGi many errors are reported. See
http://www.mail-archive.com/user
Affects Versions: Java-SCA-2.0
Reporter: Simon Laws
Assignee: Simon Laws
Fix For: Java-SCA-2.0
OASIS have now applied the fix we worked on for ASM_5023 and from the review of
the test results they have also made a change to ASM_13007 to correct a typo. I
note
101 - 200 of 3018 matches
Mail list logo
