Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

Yes, that's why I felt custom subclasses could be a good compromise: JCasGen handled by Maven, user customizations as subclasses that are kept under version control. On Wed, Nov 23, 2016 at 10:24 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > good point... > > -Marshall > > > On 11/23/2016 8:35

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

good point... -Marshall On 11/23/2016 8:35 AM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > On 22.11.2016, at 21:33, Marshall Schor wrote: >> Yes, I believe that is correct - the Maven plugin does not support "merging" >> with already generated customized JCasGen cover classes. >> >>

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

On 22.11.2016, at 21:33, Marshall Schor wrote: > > Yes, I believe that is correct - the Maven plugin does not support "merging" > with already generated customized JCasGen cover classes. > > If that was a requirement, I suspect (with some work, and dependencies such as > you

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

Yes, I believe that is correct - the Maven plugin does not support "merging" with already generated customized JCasGen cover classes. If that was a requirement, I suspect (with some work, and dependencies such as you need to have an Eclipse installation...) it could be added. -Marshall On

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

I was making some incorrect assumptions. I was assuming that the parent JCasGen'd class would correspond to a UIMA type, and the subclass would be something that extended that but didn't add any features, or needed to get registered, etc. The only reason to register it would be to have non-JCas

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

Hi, I think there is a problem with customized JCasGen cover classes. The maven plugin does not support it but just generates new classes. Best, Peter Am 21.11.2016 um 22:27 schrieb Marshall Schor: > On 11/19/2016 1:10 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote: >> Can we support generated classes being

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

On 21.11.2016, at 23:12, Marshall Schor wrote: > > there's plenty of denseness to go around :-) I think this ought to work in v2 > as well? Can you say a scenario where it wouldn't? In V2, one would at least have to manually implement the typeIndexID+friends in the subclass,

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

My recollection is that JCasGen tend to make things private and final, but I haven't looked at the generated classes in a while (by virtue of keeping them in generated-sources). P On Mon, Nov 21, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > there's plenty of denseness to go around

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

there's plenty of denseness to go around :-) I think this ought to work in v2 as well? Can you say a scenario where it wouldn't? -Marshall On 11/21/2016 4:49 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > Sorry, probably I'm being dense ;) So for V2, I'm pretty sure that this > didn't "just work",

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

Sorry, probably I'm being dense ;) So for V2, I'm pretty sure that this didn't "just work", but I gather you say that for V3, this really does work? Cheers, -- Richard > On 21.11.2016, at 22:46, Marshall Schor wrote: > > I'm probably being dense, but I'm not sure why it

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

I'm probably being dense, but I'm not sure why it wouldn't just work: Foo : a JCas gen'd class SubFoo extends Foo - the subclass new SubFoo(jcas) would create a new feature structure, assuming the constructor called its superconstructor (as is normally the case).

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

On 21.11.2016, at 22:27, Marshall Schor wrote: > > On 11/19/2016 1:10 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote: >> Can we support generated classes being handled by maven while the user >> provides custom subclasses? > We currently have a maven plugin that runs JCasGen, so, yes, I think this is >

Re: [UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

On 11/19/2016 1:10 PM, Pablo Duboue wrote: > Can we support generated classes being handled by maven while the user > provides custom subclasses? We currently have a maven plugin that runs JCasGen, so, yes, I think this is possible, even now. -Marshall > At least we should support realizing there

[UIMA 3.0] Maven Support

Can we support generated classes being handled by maven while the user provides custom subclasses? At least we should support realizing there are custom files in src and modify them there rather than generated-sources. Rationale: JCasGen output is big and computer generated. Without