[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-403?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164174#comment-13164174
]
Tom White commented on WHIRR-403:
-
I had a quick look at this, and changing the footer requ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-440?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164145#comment-13164145
]
Tom White commented on WHIRR-440:
-
+1
There's a checkstyle warning in FastDnsResolver. Aft
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-436?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164141#comment-13164141
]
Tom White commented on WHIRR-436:
-
Thanks for the contribution, Ioannis. Does this make any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-442?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Tom White reassigned WHIRR-442:
---
Assignee: Tom White
> release 0.6.0 is in breach of the AL2.0 and general Apache rules in regards
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-434?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13164004#comment-13164004
]
Tom White commented on WHIRR-434:
-
These look very useful. Where were you thinking of addin
I hear you and understand what you're getting at. Also understand I've
not been helpful in this regard myself of late.
Regardless, it's still a bad idea imo (in this context, not in general).
I notice from your spreadsheet that most stuff is green with a couple
reds. I've found that setting a dat
Paul I hope so! I'm looking forward to a strong start in 2012 :)
On Dec 6, 2011 10:20 PM, "Paul Baclace" wrote:
> I agree with Patrick on this. The real issue is the holiday season.
>
>
> Paul
>
> On 20111206 11:56 , Andrei Savu wrote:
>
>> Patrick I
I agree with Patrick on this. The real issue is the holiday season.
Paul
On 20111206 11:56 , Andrei Savu wrote:
Patrick I agree 100% but some code is better than no code. I feel like at
least for
a while I have been the only one constantly watching the email list and
doing
some work on the
Patrick I agree 100% but some code is better than no code. I feel like at
least for
a while I have been the only one constantly watching the email list and
doing
some work on the open issues.
I don't like the fact that we are delaying this release so much and most of
the
emails I write on the list
My .02 -- a core assumption of CTR is that people are actively
reviewing changes. The intent of CTR is not to reduce oversight.
That's an anti-pattern.
Patrick
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 9:38 AM, Andrei Savu wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
> I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to
> Commit-T
release 0.6.0 is in breach of the AL2.0 and general Apache rules in regards to
the inclusion of Voldemort
-
Key: WHIRR-442
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/
Hi
+1 on Andrei's suggestion.
Also my availability will increase quite a bit in the next couple of
weeks, i'll try to put in some work.
Cheers
-david
On Dec 6, 2011, at 11:49 AM, Jean-Baptiste Onofré wrote:
> Hi Andrei,
>
> +1
>
> it makes sense for me.
>
> Regards
> JB
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13163722#comment-13163722
]
Evan Pollan commented on WHIRR-441:
---
Just had this happen again, this time with max-retri
Hi Andrei,
+1
it makes sense for me.
Regards
JB
On 12/06/2011 06:38 PM, Andrei Savu wrote:
Hi guys,
I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to
Commit-Then-Review
for a while with the amendment that complicated changes still require code
review.
The main reason I am asking t
Here is the update test matrix for this release:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AvGPW01Ku6xTdE5HRUJwZm1uRE10Wk9kcWE2VncwWEE
And this is the roadmap:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR?selectedTab=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project%3Aroadmap-panel
(I think we need to op
Hi guys,
I want to propose that we change from Review-Then-Commit to
Commit-Then-Review
for a while with the amendment that complicated changes still require code
review.
The main reason I am asking this is because over the last few weeks I have
noticed
a lack of engagement from the members of th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-441?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13163706#comment-13163706
]
Andrei Savu commented on WHIRR-441:
---
Thanks Evan for reporting this. I think you should u
Precondition failure: IndexOutOfBoundsException on cluster setup
-
Key: WHIRR-441
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WHIRR-441
Project: Whirr
Issue Type: Bug
Affect
18 matches
Mail list logo
