Hi Korbinian,
I won't have time to work on Wicket topics in the foreseeable future.
Sven
On 14.11.23 11:39, Korbinian Bachl wrote:
My apologies for asking,
did you have any time for having a look at it yet?
If not, do you need any help with it?
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
Von: "
Hi,
I thought we already moved the old implementation to wicket-stuff, but
apparently I forgot to do it actually.
For explanation: the old ModalWindow is riddled with JS and dynamically
generated HTML markup which we didn't want to maintain any more.
Sven
On 20.10.23 11:22, Korbinian
LocalD*TextField has the purpose to offer some convenience constructors
and implementing ITextFormatProvider,
If you allow people to use a custom converter, this class loses its purpose.
Sven
On 22.09.23 04:47, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
On Wed, 13 Sept 2023 at 05:13, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi
Hi Maxim,
it will be hard to make that suitable for different projects with
different requirements:
In Arabic sometimes dates are written in Latin digits, so we can't call
#withDecimalStyle in general.
We could add other constructors with IConverter argument, but then
Local*TextField
+1 please release 9.13.0
Thanks
Sven
On 14.04.23 21:13, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.13.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72
I've removed queuing on branch
https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
Still ready to be merged.
We agreed to remove it from Wicket 10, didn't we?
Sven
On 08.02.23 12:54, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
No idea. There was some effort (by Sven) to remove component queueing...
+1 release 9.12.0
Many thanks
Sven
On 11.10.22 19:06, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.12.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72
+1
Sven
On 13.09.22 20:16, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
No objection from me!
Martijn
On 13 Sep 2022, at 13:14, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Looks like we have enough material to promote a new release. WDYT?
--
Andrea Del Bene.
Apache Wicket committer.
+1 yes, release
Tested build, sha256 and some examples.
Many thanks
Sven
On 06.07.22 20:27, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.11.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the
Hi Andrea,
WICKET-6993 needs some discussion, because it changes the format so much.
I'd say we start a rollout with the current fixes now.
Regard
Sven
Am 4. Juli 2022 18:00:46 MESZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene :
>Hi,
>
>I think it's time to rollout ver 9.11.0. I see we have a WICKET-6993 nut I
+1
Sven
On 05.04.22 16:47, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
+1
kind regards
Tobias
Am 05.04.2022 um 12:42 schrieb Thomas Heigl :
+1
Ran our CI build and repeated stress tests on our staging environment.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2022 at 11:07 PM Andrea Del Bene
wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache
+1 release
Sven
On 27.03.22 14:58, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.9.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72 hours minimum.
[ ]
+1 to release
Tested build, checksum and a few examples.
Sven
On 03.02.22 18:46, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
+1
I have tested our application with around 650 selenium tests and all seem
to be ok.
On Thu, Feb 3, 2022 at 8:28 AM Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache
+1 yes, release
Checked build and checksums
Thanks
Sven
On 29.01.22 17:00, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.14.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives.
+1 for merging
Sven
On 22.12.21 09:53, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
What do you think about merging
- https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/486 - use commons-fileupload2
2.0-SNAPSHOT
- https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/487 - use Spring 6.0.0-M1 (Java 17!)
This way only wicket-cdi (Weld &
+1
tested signature, build and some random examples.
Many thanks
Sven
On 30.11.21 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
+1
tested:
- signatures
- build from sources
- wicketstuff build
- wicketstuff examples
On Sat, 27 Nov 2021 at 22:52, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache
Hi,
+1 release Apache Wicket 9.6.0
Reviewed checksum, build and a few examples.
Many thanks
Sven
On 29.10.21 22:24, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.6.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the
too complex to be fully stateless with Wicket's current
support for stateless ajax.
-t
On Fri, Oct 29, 2021 at 3:59 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Thomas,
>and only page parameters are used for state
if your pages are stateless, no pageid will appear anyways - so why
bother with a custom map
Hi Thomas,
>and only page parameters are used for state
if your pages are stateless, no pageid will appear anyways - so why
bother with a custom mapper?
Sven
On 29.10.21 15:17, Thomas Heigl wrote:
Hi Andrea,
I have been using NoPageIdMapper mapper for many years in all of my
projects. It
+1 to release
Many thanks
Sven
On 07.09.21 12:17, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Sure!!
On Tue, Sep 7, 2021 at 11:37 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
+ 1 to release!
Tested:
- local build
- test various examples
- test an app that I use for tranings
In the announcement we should emphasize on two
+1 git
Am 17. August 2021 09:26:54 MESZ schrieb Andrea Del Bene :
>+1 for Git
>
>On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 8:52 AM Maxim Solodovnik
>wrote:
>
>> +1 for git
>>
>> On Tue, 17 Aug 2021 at 13:44, Martin Grigorov
>> wrote:
>>
>> > +1 for Git
>> >
>> > On Tue, Aug 17, 2021 at 9:43 AM Martin Grigorov
[X] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.13.0
Many thanks
Sven
On 07.07.21 23:07, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.13.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This
+1
Tested some examples and hash.
Many thanks
Sven
On 03.07.21 19:43, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.4.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This
ain this extra complexity and add more on top of it
Thanks
Andrew
On Thu, Jun 3, 2021 at 8:09 AM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Ernesto,
if you want to do some tests:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
Have fun
Sven
On 02.06.21 12:04, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
Hi,
I alre
Hi Ernesto,
if you want to do some tests:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/tree/remove-queuing
Have fun
Sven
On 02.06.21 12:04, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
Hi,
I already removed queuing on an experimental branch, and it was quite
simple.
Nice. We have the master branch of our
Hi,
I wasn't aware that Optional actually isn't serializable:
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/24547673/why-java-util-optional-is-not-serializable-how-to-serialize-the-object-with-suc#24564612
"The JSR-335 EG felt fairly strongly that Optional should not be on any
more than needed to
Hi,
I already removed queuing on an experimental branch, and it was quite
simple.
Regards
Sven
On 02.06.21 08:36, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <
reier...@gmail.com>
a proper refactoring of the internal classes,
which resulted in a code bloat for class MarkupContainer.
So +2 for me.
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:48 AM Martin Grigorov
wrote:
On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:58 AM Sven Meier wrote:
x) remove/rework enclosures and component queueing.
Wow!
I've
x) remove/rework enclosures and component queueing.
Have fun
Sven
On 02.04.21 13:58, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start thinking/working on
Wicket 10 ?
Here are few ideas what to break :-)
1) Move to Servlet 5.x, i.e. jakarta.servlet.**
2) Use
+1 release Apache WIcket 7.18.0
Checked hashes and build.
Thanks
Sven
On 02.04.21 23:04, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.18.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source
[x] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.12.0
Tested build and checksums.
Thanks
Sven
On 01.04.21 14:58, Sebastien Briquet wrote:
[x] Yes, release Apache Wicket 8.12.0
Tested on Wicket jQuery UI
[X] Yes, release Apache Wicket 9.3.0
Checked sha checksums and examples.
Thanks
Sven
On 25.03.21 21:24, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.3.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for
+1 for release
Tested signature and our main application.
Thanks
Sven
On 20.11.20 21:35, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.11.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source
Many thanks Andrea!
Sven
On 19.11.20 22:46, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
The Apache Wicket PMC is proud to announce Apache Wicket 9.2.0!
Apache Wicket is an open source Java component oriented web application
framework that powers thousands of web applications and web sites for
governments, stores,
+1 to release 9.2.0
Tested build, checksums and various examples
Thanks
Sven
On 15.11.20 23:18, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.2.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the
Hi,
I've added a section flush-before-detach to the migration guide, for
those needing some context to evaluate the important 9.2.0 changes:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+9.0#MigrationtoWicket9.0-Flushanddetach(andasynchronouspageserialization)
Have
WebSocketAwareCsrfPreventionRequestCycleListener has to be deprecated too.
Sven
On 14.11.20 16:50, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
I don't know why deprecation has been applied that way, but recently
I've answered a question on StackOverflow about unit testing with CSFR:
commit 15a6cedfb8b855c004b2ece201d9eac063ef770e
Author: Sven Meier
AuthorDate: Fri Nov 6 18:36:16 2020 +0100
WICKET-6847 onEndRequest before flush
allows RequestPageStore to check for stateful pages
---
pom.xml | 12
.../src
Hi all,
wicket-9.x got some important fixes, so we should release a 9.2.0 soon.
WDYT?
Sven
> I always have problems understanding what you mean by this.
"Have fun in whatever you're doing" - preferably coding with Wicket :P
Sven
On 28.10.20 11:57, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
On Wed, Oct 28, 2020 at 1:45 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Sure.
Ok.
It has gone a
Sure.
It has gone a long way from the original idea to what is today.
Have fun
Sven
On 28.10.20 11:20, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro wrote:
Hi,
I'm having a look at
AjaxDownloadBehavior
I would like to include a reference in javadoc to original work motivating
the idea.
g.
Thomas
On Fri, Oct 9, 2020 at 3:38 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Thanks!
We could argue whether your tests were valid then anyways :P
IMHO filtering/decorating of header resources is an advanced topic,
so I
doubt many people are affect by these changes.
I'll take a look at migration guide.
Hav
Thanks!
We could argue whether your tests were valid then anyways :P
IMHO filtering/decorating of header resources is an advanced topic, so I
doubt many people are affect by these changes.
I'll take a look at migration guide.
Have fun
Sven
On 09.10.20 15:18, Thomas Heigl wrote:
Hi Sven,
Hi Thomas,
so you where running your tests without a ResourceAggregator?
Could you show us how you called #setHeaderResponseDecorator() previously?
Thanks
Sven
On 09.10.20 14:30, Thomas Heigl wrote:
All my unit tests failed with the new release:
java.lang.IllegalStateException: no resource
+1 tested examples and zip signature
Sven
On 03.10.20 19:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.10.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts
I'll try to re-build wicketstuff using 9.1.0 and try again
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 16:59, Sven Meier wrote:
The CSP example works fine.
Do you have Wicket 9.0 and 9.1 on your classpath?
Sven
On 03.10.20 08:13, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Hello Sven,
I was aware of this JIRA
and have double
`
and `getCspSettings().enforce(this);` was called
On Sat, 3 Oct 2020 at 13:10, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi,
could be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6821
Do you configure your CSP in #init()?
Sven
Am 3. Oktober 2020 06:18:21 MESZ schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <
solomax...@gmail.com>:
Hi,
could be https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6821
Do you configure your CSP in #init()?
Sven
Am 3. Oktober 2020 06:18:21 MESZ schrieb Maxim Solodovnik
:
>sorry for double posting,
>
>here are the first results: CSPNonceHeaderResponseDecorator was set up,
>but
>breakpoint in
Thanks.
Sven
On 23.09.20 10:57, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Sven,
On Wed, Sep 23, 2020 at 12:42 AM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi all,
anyone know why in AbstractUpgradeFilter we check
HttpServletResponse#isCommitted():
https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/78b7cf6612b167997f810bf89065f5755ae155a8
Hi all,
anyone know why in AbstractUpgradeFilter we check
HttpServletResponse#isCommitted():
Hi Thorsten,
changed implementation is simply reversing the order of how behaviours are
called per component
the solution I was able to came up with: reverse the order of #afterRender()
only!
This way callbacks to behaviors are 'nested', i.e. the first behavior has the
first *and* last
to branch WICKET-6821-disable-CSP
>> in repository https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
>>
>> commit f1f95dd92e6c559cf5243fdf59e1ec20821df2c0
>> Author: Sven Meier
>> AuthorDate: Thu Aug 27 19:49:18 2020 +0200
>>
>> WICKET-6821 disabled CSP
>&
Hi Todd,
has this problem been reported before? It seems that problem have been
lurking there forever.
What I'm wondering: If saving of any page to the delegate fails, all
further page saving can no longer be asynchronous, isn't it?
The runnable's thread will just stop and all following
+1
tested signature and some examples.
Thanks
Sven
On 18.07.20 20:04, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
+1
tested:
- signatures
- build from sources (-Pbuildbot)
- wicketstuff build
- random wicketstuff examples
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 04:38, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache
+1
tested examples and checked sha.
Regarding the FilePageStore NullPointerException:
It seems UserDefinedFileAttributeView is not available on Os X.
IMHO we can fix this later.
Best regards
Sven
On 13.07.20 10:00, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
-0
I am unable to build the tar.gz on my mac
+1
checked some examples and sha
Sven
On 11.07.20 19:10, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.9.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72
Hi Thorsten,
ComponentRender#destroy() destroys the application, there's not much
more to it.
In most cases you will want to reuse the application for performance
reasons. A specific application can even be used as constructor
argument, which might be the main web application that you don't
Op ma 11 mei 2020 17:56 schreef Sven Meier :
Hi Edmond,
I agree that we should get rid of BehaviorIdList, it's probably the most
inefficient implementation.
But I'm against complicating matters even more with an additional method
- at least until we know how the implementation will be improved
before the 9 release, even though it has been the way it currently is since
somewhere in 7.x. To me it feels like a loose end in the API and this is
preventing me from improving the code that implements this API.
Best regards,
Emond
Op do 7 mei 2020 22:19 schreef Sven Meier :
Hi Emond,
I'm
in my implementation. I'm trying to keep things as close to what
it already was, but without having to store the additional
BehaviorIdList.
Emond
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 1:13 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi,
we have a test for stateless behaviors
Hi,
we have a test for stateless behaviors:
org.apache.wicket.ajax.markup.html.form.StatelessAjaxSubmitLinkTest
We should just make sure it still works.
Have fun
Sven
On 07.05.20 12:13, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
On 07/05/20 10:37, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi Martin,
I know what these id's
+1 we have to cut it somewhere
Sven
On 30.04.20 11:57, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
+1 to release. The current state of 9.x is very stable and IMHO it
shouldn't be delayed for major developments or refactoring.
On 30/04/20 10:04, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
+1 - lets release
kind regards
Tobias
+1
Tested some examples.
Thanks
Sven
On 22.04.20 17:33, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
+1
Tested user guide examples.
On 4/19/20 9:12 PM, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.8.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have
If it's too much hassle with these manual steps, just do another vote.
That's not a big problem for me.
Thanks
Sven
On 05.04.20 20:00, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Sorry folks but I've wrongly executed the "revert" script instead of
"promote release" :-(. Unfortunately I've realized this mistake
+1 release
Sven
On 02.04.20 11:43, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M5
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
lasts for 72 hours minimum.
[ ]
+1 release
Built and tested examples.
Thanks
Sven
On 31.03.20 20:56, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 9.0.0-M5
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This
Hi Maxim,
I'd say all changes are complete :).
Have fun
Sven
On 30.03.20 08:23, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Hello All,
Are there any incomplete tasks yet?
Shall we start new VOTE? :)))
On Mon, 9 Mar 2020 at 16:56, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro
wrote:
Hahaha... as always Martin is too fast :-)
: Sven Meier
AuthorDate: Fri Mar 27 10:13:13 2020 +0100
WICKET-6563 add CachingPageStore
---
.../apache/wicket/DefaultPageManagerProvider.java | 9 +-
.../apache/wicket/pageStore/CachingPageStore.java | 109
+
.../wicket/pageStore/InSessionPageStore.java | 82
as expected
will continue testing
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 01:12, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi,
ok, let's give it a try!
All hidden elements (hidden form fields or placeholders) are hidden via
"hidden" attribute now.
Have fun
Sven
On 24.03.20 08:15, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi all,
If you want t
eck :)
I'm currently using latest wicket SNAPSHOT at master so most probably
will provide some feedback :)
On Fri, 20 Mar 2020 at 19:51, Martin Grigorov wrote:
In this case I am fine to go with 'hidden'.
We can introduce wicket-core.css later if needed.
On Fri, Mar 20, 2020 at 1:44 PM Sven Me
Hi Rob,
it's part of the IWrappedHeaderItem interface, no way to make that
static :/.
Just use the constructor and you're good to go.
Have fun
Sven
On 23.03.20 15:09, Rob Audenaerde wrote:
Hi all,
I learned about PriorityHeaderItem, very useful!
However, I think the wrap() method
nimum as possible :)
On Tue, 17 Mar 2020 at 18:56, Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Maxim,
what is difficult about that?
Actually it is recommended to have it in your normalize.css (formerly
reset.css).
Here one without !important:
https://github.com/necolas/normalize.css/blob/master/normalize.css
m/apache/wicket/blob/10d10a92dda2e5834508f52d7807fe361f20fbea/wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/Component.java#L2370
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:35 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi all,
I've looked at all responses and most arguments in favor of a "core.css"
boil down to:
> `hidden` attribute doesn't
/Component.java#L2370
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 4:35 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi all,
I've looked at all responses and most arguments in favor of a "core.css"
boil down to:
> `hidden` attribute doesn't work (even `display: flex` breaks it)
> Using the hidden attribute puts th
https://gitbox.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket.git
The following commit(s) were added to refs/heads/master by this push:
new 6ff1084 WICKET-6727 align css marker with other css classes
6ff1084 is described below
commit 6ff10841d5dca741a43c0c2637a6d5ec7845dba2
Author: Sven Meier
AuthorDate: Fri
of how CSP
values interact across requests. For example, for js you can use
strict-dynamic, but this doesn't apply to CSS, which breaks CSS loaded
via js.
Best regards,
Emond
On Thu, Mar 12, 2020 at 12:28 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Emond,
it seems to me the CSPRequestCycleListener might add CSP headers
Hi all,
I've looked at all responses and most arguments in favor of a "core.css"
boil down to:
> `hidden` attribute doesn't work (even `display: flex` breaks it)
> Using the hidden attribute puts the responsibility with the developer
> where this should be on the framework. The hidden
Hi Emond,
it seems to me the CSPRequestCycleListener might add CSP headers
prematurely.
What if a request comes in for one page and another page is rendered in
response?
The listener will already add the headers when the request handler is
resolved for the former page.
What if the page
Hi,
I don't care about the method name, so I reverted it to #getCspSettings().
AFAIKS the documentation stays valid in that case?
Have fun
Sven
On 12.03.20 09:42, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi,
Agreed, but first, the documentation needs to be updated with the new
API. I like most of the
Hi all,
we have a disagreement on how to style hidden elements in Wicket 9.x.
Due to the new CSP support we can no longer use inline styling to hide
elements.
WICKET-6725 introduces new CSS classes and a file wicket-core.css.
I don't think this is a good approach:
- it adds a CSS file that
Fine by me.
Sven
On 05.02.20 22:22, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
This is what I have in mind:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/commit/b54938053a5bda2f4577966779d580e828f16e47
I think this is better than the old situation because this triggers
any submit handlers on the form (or any parent element
Hi,
>What about deprecating the current filters and writing a new one that
>just adds the Server-Timing header?
+1 to deprecate the current ones.
Sven
On 04.02.20 21:48, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi Martin,
I like the idea of the 'Server-Timing' headers. I didn't know this feature yet.
(see
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/hidden).
If developer/user does override he or she could take care of this by
himself.
If the only style in core css is this wicket--hidden the whole css is,
probably unnecessary.
ср, 15 янв. 2020 г. в 10:38, Sven Meier :
Hi Edmond,
the
ot sure we need a CSS file at all, just to
contain "display: none".
Thanks
Sven
On 15.01.20 18:52, Martin Grigorov wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020, 19:29 Sven Meier wrote:
I disagree, "hidden" has the perfect semantic for what we're doing with
placeholders or other s.
H
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Global_attributes/hidden
).
If developer/user does override he or she could take care of this by
himself.
If the only style in core css is this wicket--hidden the whole css is,
probably unnecessary.
ср, 15 янв. 2020 г. в 10:38, Sven Meier :
Hi Edmo
ing for the form submit handling markup needs to
go
there as well. I also found some other places with inline styling,
like FormComponentFeedbackBorder. We need to decide what to do with
those as well.
Best regards,
Emond
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:19 PM Sven Meier
wrote:
Hi Maxim,
an empty d
ll. I also found some other places with inline styling,
like FormComponentFeedbackBorder. We need to decide what to do with
those as well.
Best regards,
Emond
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:19 PM Sven Meier wrote:
Hi Maxim,
an empty div with hidden inputs does not take any space.
Try it with wicket-e
Hi Maxim,
great idea with the header contributor, that's much better!
Thanks
Sven
On 14.01.20 16:23, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
For example it can be added as
`Application.get().getHeaderContributorListeners()`
On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 at 16:03, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
`!important` is not the
den. For
example, the styling for the form submit handling markup needs to go
there as well. I also found some other places with inline styling,
like FormComponentFeedbackBorder. We need to decide what to do with
those as well.
Best regards,
Emond
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 7:19 PM Sven Meier
den attribute might work instead of `display: none`
>The latter also hides all descendants [1], so I guess it should be
>preferable
>
>[1] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/display
>
>On Wed, 15 Jan 2020 at 00:01, Sven Meier wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
&g
Hi,
do we really need this CSS?
AFAIK the 'hidden' markup from Form and Component placeholders do not
need any styling actually, they look fine without it.
We should add a CSS class to the markup of course, but leave its styling
to each project.
Cases in wicket-examples (UploadProgressBar,
Hi Edmond,
no objections from me.
While you're at it, could you take care of the Javadoc? It still
mentions IChainingModel.
Thanks
Sven
On 06.01.20 20:39, Emond Papegaaij wrote:
Hi all,
With the Wicket 9 release coming closer, I decided to give our code
base a try. Most of the
+1 built and tested various examples
The SRI demo works fine here on Windows and Ubuntu.
I'll try to add a dynamic hash calculation to the example.
Thanks
Sven
On 06.01.20 08:17, Martin Grigorov wrote:
+1 to release!
Tested local build and various Wicket Examples.
Great work with CSP and
+1 built and tested various examples
Thanks
Sven
On 03.01.20 20:39, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 8.7.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
+1 built and tested various examples
Thanks
Sven
On 04.01.20 15:51, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
This is a vote to release Apache Wicket 7.16.0
Please download the source distributions found in our staging area
linked below.
I have included the signatures for both the source archives. This vote
or without providing a custom
"MountedMapper" which feels too difficult for me.
Kind regards,
Jan
Am 04.01.20 um 17:46 schrieb Sven Meier:
Hi Jan,
>Given a table which displays the state of laboratory orders,
>When an order is canceled via a click on an AJAX button,
&g
Hi Jan,
>Given a table which displays the state of laboratory orders,
>When an order is canceled via a click on an AJAX button,
>And the page is reloaded via Ctrl + R,
>Then the order is again displayed with status "open".
the page is re-rendered on each reload. So there's no reason why the
Hi Andrea,
confirmed!
Sven
On 23.11.19 18:57, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
Hi,
I've just found that with the last OpenJDK 11.0.5 taken from
AdoptOpenJDK I'm not able to build master branch as the following test
fails:
[ERROR] Failures:
[ERROR]
;> #popup.open .popup__outer {
>> display: flex;
>> justify-content: center;
>> flex-direction: column;
>> min-height: 100%;
>> margin-bottom: 50px; /* fix issue with chrome control bar */
>> }
>> #popup.open #popup__close {
&
, 8:58 PM Andrew Kondratev
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi!
>>>
>>> Please let me know if you need further assistance with WICKET-6703
>>> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6703> or WICKET-3404
>>> <https://issues.apache.or
1 - 100 of 636 matches
Mail list logo
