This vote passes with 8 binding +1's and 1 non-binding +1, no other votes
were cast.
I'll start preparing the mirrors and maven central. The announcement might
have to wait for a PR campaign.
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No fu
Hi Diego,
Any help is welcome. I wasn't able to find a solution.
You may try with https://github.com/ivaynberg/wicket-select2. It is
much better than the autocompleter in wicket-extenstions.
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 7:23 PM, Diego Fincatto
wrote:
> What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse
+1
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - rel
What about https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-4705?
We have about 10 wicket applications, including an ecommerce website
running wicket, but we use the autocomplete a lot.
Thanks
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 10:54 AM, Carl-Eric Menzel
wrote:
> +1
>
> I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet
+1
I don't have anything major with 6.0 yet so I gave my training
application a quick&dirty port to 6.0 from 1.5. Everything seems to
work fine after a few adjustments.
On Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:27:10 +0200
Emond Papegaaij wrote:
> +1
>
> Checked:
> - tag (with signing)
> - zip conten
+1 from me. I've tested the quickstart, examples and re-building the
artifacts (zip and tar ball).
Martijn
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> che
+1
Am 27.08.2012 um 11:27 schrieb Emond Papegaaij:
> +1
>
> Checked:
> - tag (with signing)
> - zip contents and build
> - selenium tests for a large application
>
> Emond
>
> On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. Thi
+1
Checked:
- tag (with signing)
- zip contents and build
- selenium tests for a large application
Emond
On Thursday 23 August 2012 23:13:28 Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following sou
+1 to release
tested :
- pgp signature verification for the tar.gz file
- build a quickstart from the locally installed archetype
- random examples (the old ones)
- relatively big application
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 8:17 PM, Sven Meier wrote:
> +1 release
>
> Sven
>
>
> On 08/23/2012 11:13 PM, M
+1 release
Sven
On 08/23/2012 11:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
- tag: wicket-6.0.0
- release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
+1
Pedro Santos
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:44 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote:
> +1
>
> -igor
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
> wrote:
> > No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
> >
> > Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> > checking
+1
-igor
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 2:13 PM, Martijn Dashorst
wrote:
> No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
>
> Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
> checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
>
> - tag: wicket-6.0.0
> - release branch: builds/wick
No fuzz, no separate RC releases. This is the real deal.
Please vote for releasing the following source artifacts after
checking them thoroughly for any misgivings:
- tag: wicket-6.0.0
- release branch: builds/wicket-6.0.0
- artifacts:
- apache-wicket-6.0.0.tar.gz
- apache-wicket-6.0.0.z
13 matches
Mail list logo
