+1, given Franks point..
Frank Bille wrote:
+1, given that the pictures are all checked for copyright.
Frank
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thoof has generously donated their fluffy kitten-captcha to the Apache
Wicket project for inclusion.
[ x ] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
Juergen
I have gotten the information that convince me that those images are
really the property of Thoof and therefore doesn't have a problem. My
+1 stands :)
Frank
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:38 AM, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL
[ x ] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
Maurice
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 8:06 AM, Juergen Donnerstag
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[ x ] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
Juergen
Thoof has generously donated their fluffy kitten-captcha to the Apache
Wicket project for inclusion. Kitten captcha is a captcha that works
through selecting pictures of kittens in a jumble of other objects,
such as a hamster, guinea pig or rabbit.
This is a vote to accept this donation. You can
On 5/18/08, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
[X] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 8:22 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thoof has generously donated their fluffy kitten-captcha to the Apache
Wicket project for inclusion. Kitten captcha is a captcha that works
through selecting pictures of
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Martijn Dashorst [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[X] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
/Gwyn
[ x ] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
[ ] no, insert objection
Eelco
But unless those images are ASL licensed (which images normally
aren't), shouldn't we at least ask which license they were originally
under? IANAL but as I see it:
1) The images are created by Thoof.com (pictures taken, manipulated
into what they are now). All is fine
2) The images are 3. party,
Specifically the software grant [1] starts with:
WHEREAS, Licensor owns or has sufficient rights to contribute the
software source code and other related intellectual property as
itemized on Exhibit A (Software) under the terms of this agreement
to the Foundation for use within Foundation
Here are my thoughts on it:
1) I personally only know how to write code; not how to create cute
kitten images. Therefore I don't question that Thoof could really have
created the source code at hand. And the source code is not *so*
complex. But in my world it takes more effort to create a kitten
Yes but shouldn't we know what license they are on, if they are not
owned by Thoof?
Frank
On Sun, May 18, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Specifically the software grant [1] starts with:
WHEREAS, Licensor owns or has sufficient rights to contribute the
software
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:12 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/08, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes but shouldn't we know what license they are on, if they are not
owned by Thoof?
So you don't trust the signature by the CTO/CEO of Thoof that the
contributed
On 5/19/08, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I personally only know how to write code; not how to create cute
kitten images. Therefore I don't question that Thoof could really have
created the source code at hand. And the source code is not *so*
complex. But in my world it takes
On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 12:23 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 5/19/08, Frank Bille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1) I personally only know how to write code; not how to create cute
kitten images. Therefore I don't question that Thoof could really have
created the source code at
[x] yes, accept kitten-captcha into Wicket
17 matches
Mail list logo
