RE: Id on Components

2008-04-14 Thread Martijn C. Vos
Bruno Borges wrote: I'm not sure, but I would guess the reason for this is that if you create a component with an Id, that component binds to a specific markup. And if it is allowed to change it's id, it means that you could re-bind it with another (probably invalid) markkup, creating

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Korbinian Bachl - privat
(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes -Matej Regards, Korbinian

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Johan Compagner
be some less typing :) Best, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes -Matej Regards, Korbinian

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Korbinian Bachl - privat
for wicket:id= e.g.: w:id= or even only :id= ? Would be some less typing :) Best, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes -Matej

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Korbinian Bachl - privat
, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes -Matej Regards, Korbinian

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
= or even only :id= ? Would be some less typing :) Best, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Korbinian Bachl - privat
= e.g.: w:id= or even only :id= ? Would be some less typing :) Best, Korbinian Matej Knopp schrieb: short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes -Matej

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-12 Thread Juergen Donnerstag
: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? short anwer: - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? yes -Matej Regards, Korbinian

Id on Components

2008-04-11 Thread Korbinian Bachl - privat
Hi, short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? Regards, Korbinian

Re: Id on Components

2008-04-11 Thread Bruno Borges
, 2008 at 5:18 PM, Korbinian Bachl - privat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, short question: Why isn't it possible to have a setId(String id) on the components? - Is it really necessary that they know their id at creation-time? Regards, Korbinian -- Bruno Borges blog.brunoborges.com.br +55