I'll try today
François
Le 5 janv. 2016 à 09:58, martin-g a écrit :
> Github user martin-g commented on the pull request:
>
>https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/154#issuecomment-168938119
>
>It is interesting to find how this got broken.
>Do you
Wrong addressee, should be dev-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org
On Tue, Jan 5, 2016 at 10:10 AM, shankar b wrote:
> Unsubscribe from Apache Wicket development list
> --
>
> *Shankar Balachandran,*
> Technical Director, Kailao Consulting Ltd
>
> phone: +23058261640
>
>
Github user bitstorm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/154#issuecomment-169041812
@francois92 could you please close this PR? The problem has been fixed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user francois92 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/154
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
if the CachingStrategy is FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy (default)
BasicResourceReferenceMapper # mapHandler
--> getCachingStrategy().decorateUrl(resourceUrl, cacheable);
--> FilenameWithVersionResourceCachingStrategy # decorateUrl()
ok, I'll take a look today
On 5 Jan 2016 12:27, "Martin Grigorov" wrote:
> This sounds as a regression caused by 950df6c24196680a48646ff92b3d95
> 9f4985a238
>
> @Andrea: could you please investigate and either improve further or revert
> the change? Thanks!
>
> Martin