Martin,
Just as a side note - I just verified that the license can be overridden
by child projects - simply define a different license and maven ignores the
parent license. I am trying to organize the projects in Wicket Stuff, and
have created a common core-parent. Please look here and note
Ones the template for the other :)
So wicket-persistence-template are a template for wicket-iolite , the
latter are an archetype...
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Nino,
I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both
Argh! been too fast there...
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Also:
wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nino,
I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
Hi Jeremy,
just saw your commits on wicket-stuff.
I allways like any attempt to get some more stucture into wicket-stuff.
One thing I saw was the licences tag in the pom.xml
http://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/wicket-stuff/trunk/pom.xml?revision=4329view=markuppathrev=4329
16
I copied that from wicketstuff-parent and used it as a test. Indeed, it
wasn't going to work with the way WS is structured now, so I removed it.
Thank you!
Jeremy Thomerson
On Wed, Nov 19, 2008 at 2:24 AM, Martin Funk [EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
just saw your commits on
So it seems to be running well. The only failure is on one project that has
compile errors.
What are the next steps? I don't mind running this on my server, but I
assume we need to set it up to export snapshot builds to maven repos, etc.
I am not familiar with what the TC setup was before. I
Devs,
In response to the problems with TeamCity and Sourceforge, I installed a
Continuum instance on my server last night. I added Wicket and several
Wicket Stuff projects. It seems to be running fine, except that most
projects are missing the SCM tag from their POM, or have it incorrectly
Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
correctly? Then it is just a matter of inheriting from the parent pom
for all projects.
Martijn
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 5:21 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Devs,
In response to the problems with TeamCity and
When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
inherit correctly, though. Right?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could you structure the parent pom such that it sets up all child poms
correctly? Then it is just a matter of
Yes - and I think that's the best thing to do. To make this work, I would
do this:
- Create a pom.xml in wicketstuff trunk that sets up the SCM correctly
and relies on wicket 1.4-SNAPSHOT
- Delete the wicket-parent folder under trunk because it's not really
needed if we do this
-
The problem is that the entire tree isn't copied over together, so the
SCM links get messed up when you do that.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL
Tough to be sure - we could experiment.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 10:50 AM, James Carman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
When you create a tag/branch of the child, the SCM setup wouldn't
inherit correctly, though. Right?
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 11:44 AM, Martijn Dashorst
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm talking about the SCM url itself. It needs to change in the child
when a branch/tag is created (because it now lives in a different
place). Of course it would be able to find its parent (as long as
it's in the local repository).
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:04 PM, Jeremy Thomerson
[EMAIL
Oh, gotcha! I'll try a test with one of my projects and see, but I think
you're right.
If so, I am still willing to add the SCM info to each pom if necessary - but
I still want approval of the crowd since those aren't my projects to alter.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On
If all of wicketstuff was branched/tagged together, this would work
and you could let the release plugin automagically change it for you.
But, since they all have their own lifecycle (their own
trunk/branches/tags), then you need to configure them individually.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 12:12 PM,
Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just
add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once I hear back whether anyone is
in agreement with this or not, I can proceed (or not).
At some point in the future we should probably discuss some way of creating
at least a
Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my
own projects, can you provide a sniplet on how it should look?
regards Nino
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Yes - you're right. Overall, I think it will be much less intrusive to just
add or fix the SCM tag in each project. Once
Send me a list of which are yours and I'll try them as samples.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 1:20 PM, Nino Saturnino Martinez Vazquez Wael
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure fine by me, and good initiative! I'll try to see if I can fix my own
And, as an example, look at this pom:
https://wicket-stuff.svn.sourceforge.net/svnroot/wicket-stuff/trunk/wicketstuff-calendarviews/pom.xml
The important part that is messed up or missing from most is that connection
URL in the SCM tag. Take the one from that pom and modify accordingly
(change
http://wicketstuff.org/confluence/display/STUFFWIKI/Project+Maintainers
I think those are some of them (where my name are on), there could be
more cant remember.. I think I've upgraded all to use 1-4 snapshot of
wicket...
Jeremy Thomerson wrote:
Send me a list of which are yours and I'll
Nino,
I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same group and
artifact IDs.
I'm going to wait to add them to the build server - can you tell me what
the difference is? Maybe one should be renamed?
Also:
wicket-contrib-accordian is named Wicket Contrib Openlayers
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:20 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Nino,
I'm updating your poms and adding yours. I ran into a problem - you have
wicket-persistence-template and wicket-iolite - both have the same
Okay, all of yours are added (includeing the persistence-template /
iolite).
wicket-contrib-openlayers-examples doesn't compile
The rest are all building fine.
--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com
On Tue, Nov 18, 2008 at 2:25 PM, Jeremy Thomerson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Also:
23 matches
Mail list logo
