Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

All the following in this implementation is completed. - Reading the api manager related configuration from a configuration file - Adding the thumbnail of the API. Currently having an issue when adding a thumbnail in the G-Reg 5.2.0 publisher [1]. This is however fixed in the G-Reg

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

yeah Nuwan. That's what the token regeneration part does. Shazni Nazeer Mob : +94 37331 LinkedIn : http://lk.linkedin.com/in/shazninazeer Blog : http://shazninazeer.blogspot.com On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 6:13 PM, Nuwan Bandara wrote: > ah got it, thanks. So I assume when a

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

ah got it, thanks. So I assume when a person is logged into the publisher the API-M token is refreshed automatically if expired correct ? On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Shazni Nazir wrote: > Hi NuwanB, > > ​We only need publisher integration right, so why are we doing token

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Hi NuwanB, ​We only need publisher integration right, so why are we doing token > generation as thats a store function ?​ To use the new API-M REST API, you need token generation. Refer following documentation [1] [1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM1100/apidocs/publisher/index.html#guide

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Hi Guys, On Mon, May 23, 2016 at 8:27 AM, Shazni Nazir wrote: > Last week had a meeting with G-Reg team (participants - Sagara, Chandana > and SameeraM) and SanjeewaM from API-M to see the current work and to get > few thing clarified. Notes of the meeting can be found in the

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Last week had a meeting with G-Reg team (participants - Sagara, Chandana and SameeraM) and SanjeewaM from API-M to see the current work and to get few thing clarified. Notes of the meeting can be found in the following [1] [1] Invitation: G-Reg extension for API-M integration design/current

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Since this component is developed as an extension, it can be deployed as a jar to the repository/components/lib as a library. And other artifacts like rxts can be added to G-Reg in runtime. With this setup I can test with a standalone G-Reg 5.2.0 with a standalone API-M 1.10.0 without any hassle.

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Great! How are we planning to test this implementation? Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe Vice President Delivery WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Shazni Nazir wrote: > Yes Samisa, so far so good. > > I'll also be having a review with NuwanB

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Yes Samisa, so far so good. I'll also be having a review with NuwanB and G-Reg team by Thursday to see if things are aligned. On 16 May 2016 6:33 p.m., "Samisa Abeysinghe" wrote: Are we on track in terms of the time schedule to deliver this? Thanks, Samisa... Samisa

Re: [Dev] G-Reg extension for integration with API-M

Are we on track in terms of the time schedule to deliver this? Thanks, Samisa... Samisa Abeysinghe Vice President Delivery WSO2 Inc. http://wso2.com On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Shazni Nazir wrote: > Hi all, > > Following is the current update of the G-Reg extension