Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
I suppose you're just trying to sense if others think that it would be a
good idea to have it as a subproject. If so, I'm in favor of putting a
proposal together, +1.
-Flavio
On Dec 2, 2011, at 8:45 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
Somehow this got off list
at 11:42 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@apache.org wrote:
+1
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Incubator is the Apache recommended way to handle this. We could be
the sponsor, with the intent that once Curator graduates from the
incubator we would accept
be good to see what others think.
Patrick
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 1:50 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Ted. Incubator has a number of benefits for new projects; helping
them learn the ropes of Apache, setup infrastructure, build community,
create their own Apache blessed release
I believe this can effect not just 3.3-3.4 upgrades but also normal
operation of a 3.4 cluster. I'd suggest holding off on 3.4 until 3.4.1
is available. (Mahadev and I are working on it for RC later this week,
a patch should be available soon).
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 10:25 AM, Mahadev
, at 6:08 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
Any ZooKeeper contributor can host such a meetup. Just post the
details to the list. I would think we can also have conference call in
numbers at the very least if people are interested in participating
remotely.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:04 AM
Good idea Mahadev. Let's just be (more) explicit in our messaging
about what's production ready and what's not.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:56 PM, iv...@apache.org wrote:
Sounds good to me.
-Ivan
On Wed, Dec 07, 2011 at 01:50:19PM -0800, Mahadev Konar wrote:
Actually, I think Ill
If you're using git to manage your patches locally this script is
super useful, it will upload reviews from the commandline, filling in
just about all the details. You do however need to use this slightly
modified version of rbtools
https://github.com/phunt/rbtools/commits/ro_reviewboard
(clone
some issues found on first look, not sure if these are blockers:
release date in the changes.txt says tbd
Why did you sign all the checksum files in dist-maven?
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
release date in the changes.txt says tbd
Yikes. Is this a blocker?
probably not, but can you edit the changes.txt on the branch right now?
isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
plz
+1, tests all pass, sig/xsums are correct.
Patrick
On Mon, Dec 12, 2011 at 11:11 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
isn't that a step in the how to release? updating the date? (if not
plz update the page)
Its there. Missed it :(.
mahadev
Why did you sign all the checksum
Infra updated the config on reviews.apache.org such that all you need
is rbtools and my script, updated script repo here:
https://github.com/phunt/apache-reviewboard-zk-git
Patrick
On Fri, Dec 9, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Hrm, the script text got borked. that last
I posted the one for svn as well:
https://github.com/phunt/apache-reviewboard-zk-svn
Not at slick as git but if you're using svn it's helpful.
Patrick
On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 11:30 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Infra updated the config on reviews.apache.org such that all you need
Kudos guys!
You should write a blog post about this, let more people know about it.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Just in case people on this list haven't seen it yet, HDFS-234 (Integration
with BookKeeper logging system) has gone in.
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/2208/#review3914
---
a good cleanup, some comments before we can commit it.
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 9:08 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Kudos guys!
You should write a blog post about this, let more people know about it.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:47 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com
wrote:
Just in case people on this list haven't seen
This proposal looks good to me in general. I'm in favor of having
improved recipes available for users, Curator seems to fit the bill.
However as I stated previously while I'd be +1 for this to go to the
incubator (with ZK PMC as sponsor), I'm -0 for this as a sub/artifact.
(this is the same as my
The logs should have details on what happened. If you can provide them
from around the time this occurred it would likely provide insight.
Note that 3.4.0 has a serious problem wrt cluster consistency, I don't
see how this would result in two leaders being elected however.
Patrick
On Tue, Dec
Really the logs are critical here. If you can provide them it would shed light.
Patrick
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Benjamin Reed br...@apache.org wrote:
i've seen it before when the configuration files haven't been setup
properly. i would check the configuration. if the leader is still
+1, lgtm. verified sig/xsum, rat, also ran the tests successfully.
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.4.2. 2 JIRAs are
addressed in this release.
*** Please download, test and VOTE
/
---
(Updated 2011-12-09 20:45:09)
Review request for zookeeper, Patrick Hunt and Mahadev Konar.
Summary
---
Add a setup script for ZooKeeper
This addresses bug ZOOKEEPER-1296.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1296
Diffs
-
http
On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 5:53 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Can I assume that async requests from different zk handles don't have
guaranteed order of execution ?
Not sure what you mean. There will be _an_ order, and you're
guaranteed that all sessions will see the same order. The order
I picked this up from hbase, add the newbie label to a jira if you
think it's appropriate for new contributors. I started marking as
such, please feel free to add more as you identify them:
I believe there is a bug in this commit. The cnxns size() call is
not being synchronized. This will lead to invalid results at best, at
worst outright failure (hard to say w/o knowing the implementation of
HashSet).
Camille can you work with Neha to get this fixed? Perhaps in the
meantime (if
I wanted to share this section of my recent report to the board (I've
also gotten permission to share the board's response)
A discussion is currently under way regarding the possibility of merging the
recently open sourced Curator source base from Netflix. These are client
implementations of
meaningful enough to be worth the sync overhead. We
should look into that. The alternative if we must is using a proper
concurrent collection. Neha, any thoughts?
C
On Dec 28, 2011 12:45 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I believe there is a bug in this commit. The cnxns size() call
there are no callers of this function why
keep it? I'd still rather we remove it given it's dead code. Perhaps
there are locations where we should be using and aren't?
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 11:24 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I think it needs to be fixed. It's obviously incorrect. Also if
someone
?
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:10 PM, Camille Fournier cami...@apache.org wrote:
I don't think creating it as a flat sync is a good idea, so if we want this
I think we need to refactor that structure to be concurrent.
C
On Dec 28, 2011 2:24 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I think
?
Patrick
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 4:32 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 1:26 PM, Camille Fournier cami...@apache.org
wrote:
I'm not sure I agree in the assumption that monitoring pulls happen
infrequently...
Well that would be bad news then - see stat command
server to use it.
I would also welcome help on this issue, if there's someone else is
interested in tackling it, I am happy to provide feedback and guidance.
Should I start clean and make a new tracker or fold it into 1197?
C
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 5:12 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote
to commit
yourselves (to start with) one of the existing zk committers would
have to review/commit for you. Granted it's not an optimal situation.
That's why incubator/subproj are better imo.
Patrick
On 12/28/11 10:02 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I wanted to share this section of my
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 5:57 AM, Thomas Koch tho...@koch.ro wrote: there
has been a discussion in December about a developer meeting, where you
also wanted to discuss the roadmap for ZK, but when I checked now, I
couldn't find a fixed date.
It's fine to discuss the roadmap on list. We
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/3364/#review4185
---
src/java/main/org/apache/zookeeper/ZooKeeper.java
:
Patrick Hunt:
It's fine to discuss the roadmap on list. We should only be making
decisions on list regardless. Last I heard from Mahadev he was
coordinating the meetup for sometime this month or early next.
So just for the record, I don't expect many to agree:
It's my understanding
in june it will be stability and
test patches that are going in, and then in july 1st we release what
is ready.
ben
On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 12:00 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Our first goal is always reliability, it goes without saying which
is why I didn't highlight it. Every
2012/1/5 César Álvarez Núñez cesar.alvarez.nu...@gmail.com:
Hi all,
I would like to:
- Modify the usage of slf4j api on zk code since calls to
org.slf4j.Logger methods should use parameters instead of string
concatenation (http://www.slf4j.org/faq.html#logging_performance)
The
dup of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-338 ?
Patrick
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Neha
Filing a jira is a great way to further the discussion.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 9, 2012, at 15:33, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com
, Jan 9, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
dup of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-338 ?
Patrick
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
Neha
Filing a jira is a great way to further the discussion.
Sent from my iPhone
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Henry Robinson he...@cloudera.com wrote:
Hi -
The unit tests are taking longer and longer to run, particularly locally. I
was poking about looking for some easy wins, and I noticed that a lot of
the time is spent waiting for servers to come up, which is
On Mon, Jan 16, 2012 at 10:35 PM, Henry Robinson he...@cloudera.com wrote:
On 16 January 2012 17:36, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Sun, Jan 15, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Henry Robinson he...@cloudera.com
wrote:
Hi -
The unit tests are taking longer and longer to run, particularly
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:03 PM, Camille Fournier cami...@apache.org wrote:
I think it can be done. Looking through the code, it seems like it should
be safe modulo some stats that are set in the FinalRequestProcessor that
may be less useful.
Turning around HBs at the head end of the server
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 3:21 PM, Camille Fournier c...@renttherunway.com
wrote:
Duh, I knew there was something I was forgetting. You can't process the
session timeout faster than the server can process the full pipeline, so
making pings come back faster just means you will have a false sense
I've been tracking the following ideas for 3.5 roadmap, things i'd
personally like to see addressed in the release and perhaps cut 3.5.0
in June, earlier if we can make some progress. (Not meant to be an
exhaustive list or a blocker for 3.5.0)
* scalability - 100k clients
* jdk7 and openjdk
1366 deserves it's own line. That's a major improvement over current behavior.
Patrick
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:42 PM, Ted Dunning ted.dunn...@gmail.com wrote:
1366 should be in this list under improve reliability.
On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I've
On Sat, Jan 21, 2012 at 1:02 AM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
I like the idea of a github repository to share code changes in progress.
Pat has also pointed it out offline.
I personally use git (and github) and it works well for me. However my
concern in this case is that if we
+1, the xsums/sig match, rat ran fine, I was able to build and run all
the tests successfully. I tried starting some servers. I also verified
ZOOKEEPER-1367 using the method outlined in the jira and that was all
fine.
Patrick
On Wed, Feb 8, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Mahadev Konar maha...@hortonworks.com
and restarting servers, which worked fine.
-Flavio
On Feb 8, 2012, at 8:34 PM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
+1, the xsums/sig match, rat ran fine, I was able to build and run all
the tests successfully. I tried starting some servers. I also verified
ZOOKEEPER-1367 using the method outlined in the jira
Kudos!
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:20 PM, Flavio Junqueira f...@yahoo-inc.com wrote:
Great job, Sijie!
-Flavio
On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Reed wrote:
because of the great contributions (and the expectation of even more
contributions :) of Sijie Guo to the bookkeeper project. the
Actually we have been trying to maintain backward compatibility on
user facing features, including cli. For example
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1326 was implemented
to maintain b/w compat. It's possible to use the CLI in scripts and
often people automate processes using it. I'd
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 10:00 PM, Hartmut Lang
hartmut.l...@googlemail.com wrote:
Of course for some time we could support both styles. So you would be able
to do:
get path watch and get -w path. And later we could remove the old style.
Yes, this is my suggestion. Make it backward compatible
I'm working on cutting a 3.3.5 release candidate. I should be sending
something out shortly.
Patrick
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.5. 9 JIRAs are
addressed in this release.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 10pm PT on Saturday, March 10.***
http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.5-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Patrick
+1 The release checks out for me. I did some distributed testing. My
QA team also verified ZOOKEEPER-1367 was fixed.
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.5. 9 JIRAs are
addressed in this release
Based on Botond's findings here
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1412 I'm going to
respin a new RC (after I fix the issue). Hopefully later today.
Patrick
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 12:11 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 The release checks out for me. I did some
Please enter a jira for these. If you'd like to submit a patch that
would be even better. thanks!
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/HowToContribute
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 6:19 AM, Shuai Mu msmu...@gmail.com wrote:
and
for getting this out
Pat!
Mahadev Konar
Hortonworks Inc.
http://hortonworks.com/
On Sun, Mar 18, 2012 at 9:54 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1 lgtm. I've tested out a number of cluster sizes (3/5/7/9) and
everything seems fine.
Patrick
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Patrick
with $? == 0 regardless if the znode is present or not
present! I've checked with Patrick Hunt (ZK committer) and this the
expected behavior. The only non-zero retcodes are for abnormal exits
(exceptions thrown)
Here's the ZK code I was looking through
https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/blob
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:26 AM, Alan D. Cabrera l...@toolazydogs.com wrote:
I take the silence to mean that the answer is no. Would anyone have a
problem if I worked on such a beast?
You saw this right? afaik there isn't.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ZOOKEEPER/ZKClientBindings
/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER
Patrick
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:57 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
I looked at the patch for ZOOKEEPER-1059 which should have converted the
NPE to KeeperException.NoNodeException
Why
, 2012 at 9:42 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Near term, if we can find out a way for shell script to detect the
absence
of particular zookeeper node, rolling-restart.sh can be restored.
Otherwise we may need
That's great news, glad it worked out. Thanks for the update Ted.
Patrick
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
We're using the trick Patrick proposed, see:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-5603
FYI
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:14 AM, Patrick Hunt ph
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper version 3.3.5
ZooKeeper is a high-performance coordination service for distributed
applications. It exposes common services - such as naming,
configuration management, synchronization, and group services - in a
simple interface so
FYI ZooKeeper dev team: noticed this message from Infra today (below).
This is already impacting us - I was unable to finalize the 3.3.5
release last night due to some changes that have already gone into
effect from infra.
See these jira for background:
...@gmail.com wrote:
When can I expect the maven artifacts to be available ?
They're not in http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/
Cheers
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:22 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
The Apache ZooKeeper team is proud to announce Apache ZooKeeper
jira to work out the details.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-4565
Patrick
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
FYI ZooKeeper dev team: noticed this message from Infra today (below).
This is already impacting us - I was unable to finalize the 3.3.5
/zookeeper/zookeeper/
Going forward we will need to use some ivy modifications that I've
been working on, which you can see here:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1430
to deploy the zk mvn artifacts during a release.
Patrick
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Patrick Hunt ph
Your point being that this should be an info message rather than a
warning? (which sounds reasonable to me)
Patrick
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
We use zookeeper 3.3.5
From the output of one of our integration tests:
Please create a jira for this, attach the logs, config, etc... Thanks.
Patrick
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Neha Narkhede neha.narkh...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
This week, we saw a potential bug with zookeeper 3.3.4. In an attempt to
adding a separate disk for zookeeper transaction logs,
Part of what you're asking about is available. if the heartbeat goes
away, the nodes created by that client should get deleted. That's
available in the current REST proxy in src/contrib/rest. See the
SPEC.txt file there for more details.
Patrick
On Mon, May 7, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Narayanan A R
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:21 AM, César Álvarez Núñez
cesar.alvarez.nu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
When I create a node with null data, Stat.dataLength is 0.
When I create a node with byte[0] data, Stat.dataLength is 0.
I think that in the first case dataLength should return -1 instead of 0.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 7:59 AM, Antonio Mauriello antonio...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Is there a release date for Zookeeper 3.4.4 ?
We typically discuss things like new releases (ie futures) on the dev
list. Good to follow there if you'd like such insights. That said, I'm
hoping that we do one
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Narayanan A R
narayanan.arunacha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does ZK has or have plans to add the following features:
- Query znodes under a path by passing filter on the attributes.
Sounds intriguing, depending on the details. Might be a good addition
to the
who need this functionality implement it in client side code.
Patrick
On May 17, 2012, at 3:31 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Narayanan A R
narayanan.arunacha...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Does ZK has or have plans to add the following features
that are similarly slated. (ie changing the
version from 32bit to 64, etc...)
Patrick
/César.
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 11:41 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, May 17, 2012 at 2:21 AM, César Álvarez Núñez
cesar.alvarez.nu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi All,
When I create a node with null
Speaking of windows, Michi can you take a look why the windows job has
started failing of late? Perhaps an environment change? (you might
look at other windows jobs on that box to get an idea)
https://builds.apache.org//view/S-Z/view/ZooKeeper/job/ZooKeeper-trunk-WinVS2008/
Thanks!
Patrick
On
.
--Michi
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 3:17 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Speaking of windows, Michi can you take a look why the windows job has
started failing of late? Perhaps an environment change? (you might
look at other windows jobs on that box to get an idea)
https
Regular xids are always non-negative.
Patrick
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:15 AM, Michi Mutsuzaki mi...@cs.stanford.edu wrote:
Hi,
There are some predefined XIDs (like #define PING_XID -2) in
zk_adaptor.h. Why do we need them? How do they avoid colliding with
regular XIDs?
Thanks!
--Michi
Any errors or other output in the server logs when you do this?
(perhaps run the server at DEBUG or higher in order to get more
insight where it's failing)
Are you running the same server version both at home and work?
Patrick
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
when that happens (really in 4.0 we should change
to a long rather than an int for many of these counters, e.g.
version)
Thanks!
Patrick
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Regular xids are always non-negative.
Patrick
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 12:15 AM
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 11:01 PM, Michi Mutsuzaki mi...@cs.stanford.edu wrote:
If the user calls an async request followed by a sync request, does
the zookeeper client guarantee that the sync request won't return
until the async request callback is invoked? The C client seems to let
the sync
We should probably remove that, or at least document it. The upgrade
facility is for upgrading from version 2 to version 3. There is no
need to run upgrade if upgrading a minor/fix version.
Patrick
On Wed, Jun 20, 2012 at 4:03 AM, Nijel s f nijel...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi all,
I am trying one
It's supported in the sense that the jvm supports it. I'm not sure
what you're asking.
Patrick
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 3:33 AM, Rakesh R rake...@huawei.com wrote:
Hi All,
JMX remote monitoring:
---
I failed to find any configuration for the 'jmxPort' in the
On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Nijel s f nijel...@huawei.com wrote:
I executed the updgrade scenario from 3.3.5 version to 3.4.3
But still getting the same exception :(
Re-read my previous email is for upgrading from version 2 to version
3. Perhaps I wasn't clear enough - if you are
On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Rakesh R rake...@huawei.com wrote:
My question is, whether zookeeper should expose 'jmxremote' parameters as
configurable items[one suggestion like env variable as follows]. So that OM
can configure it and start multiple servers? Also application users can
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
For Ted's question, developers and ops at the company I mentioned would be
able to give their answer.
We have a general policy of not adding new features to fix releases.
What testing have you done with 3.4.3 that concerns
are interested in using some of the new features.
Patrick
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:07 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Jun 27, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Ted Yu yuzhih...@gmail.com wrote:
For Ted's question, developers and ops at the company I mentioned would
be
able to give their answer.
We
Mahadev and I were discussing that we should plan for 3.3.6 and 3.4.4
releases soon. Primarily to incorporate the SASL fix and the log
truncation fix. I don't see much pressing for the rest of the pending
jiras.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1489
really like to see ZOOKEEPER-1465 in this as well if possible.
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:35 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
Mahadev and I were discussing that we should plan for 3.3.6 and 3.4.4
releases soon. Primarily to incorporate the SASL fix and the log
truncation fix. I don't see
Sounds interesting but it's not clear to me from the provided docs
what it does and what am I expected to do? (canned tests or a
framework for me to use). Have you been able to find any issues using
this?
Patrick
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 3:15 AM, Andrei Savu savu.and...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi guys,
Koontz ekoo...@hiro-tan.org wrote:
On 6/29/12 10:35 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote:
Mahadev and I were discussing that we should plan for 3.3.6 and 3.4.4
releases soon. Primarily to incorporate the SASL fix and the log
truncation fix. I don't see much pressing for the rest of the pending
jiras.
https
, Camille Fournier cami...@apache.org wrote:
Looking at 1489... Are we putting printlns in tests now? I can't remember
if that's kosher or not.
C
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
There's one blocker left covering both 3.3.6 and 3.4.4:
https://issues.apache.org
/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1437), if someone can
work with Eugene to finalize this it would be great. Anyone?
Patrick
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
It was that way in the original code. I kept it because it was easier
to see when running in eclipse, etc... Given it all
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper 3.3.6. 16 JIRAs are
addressed in this release.
*** Please download, test and VOTE before the
*** vote closes 11pm PT on Tuesday, July 31.***
http://people.apache.org/~phunt/zookeeper-3.3.6-candidate-0/
Should we release this?
Patrick
+1. I ran the release candidate through it's paces with various
ensemble sizes and it worked fine. I also ran RAT and the test suite
and everything looks fine to me.
Patrick
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 11:39 PM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
I have created a candidate build for ZooKeeper
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:04 AM, Warren Turkal w...@ooyala.com wrote:
I'm sure this is a really newbie type question, but I couldn't find docs on
how to do this.
I am researching making a pluggable auth module. Is there any way to access
data in zookeeper nodes from a pluggable auth module?
...@apache.org wrote:
+1. Started up a 3-node cluster, ran some basic tests against it, looks ok.
C
On Tue, Jul 31, 2012 at 1:04 AM, Patrick Hunt ph...@apache.org wrote:
+1. I ran the release candidate through it's paces with various
ensemble sizes and it worked fine. I also ran RAT and the test suite
?
- Patrick Hunt
On Aug. 1, 2012, 6:20 p.m., Matteo Bertozzi wrote:
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6290/
---
(Updated Aug
On Aug. 1, 2012, 6:38 p.m., Patrick Hunt wrote:
/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/SaslAuthDesignatedServerTest.java,
line 77
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6290/diff/1/?file=132325#file132325line77
why is this sleep here?
Eugene Koontz wrote:
These sleep()s
On Aug. 1, 2012, 6:38 p.m., Patrick Hunt wrote:
/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/SaslAuthDesignatedServerTest.java,
line 77
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6290/diff/1/?file=132325#file132325line77
why is this sleep here?
Eugene Koontz wrote:
These sleep()s
On Aug. 1, 2012, 6:38 p.m., Patrick Hunt wrote:
/src/java/test/org/apache/zookeeper/test/SaslAuthDesignatedServerTest.java,
line 77
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6290/diff/1/?file=132325#file132325line77
why is this sleep here?
Eugene Koontz wrote:
These sleep()s
/org/apache/zookeeper/test/SaslAuthDesignatedServerTest.java
https://reviews.apache.org/r/6290/#comment20709
This timeout is too low. Typically we make it the connection timeout, otw
it has the tendency to fail intermittently (for example on slow/loaded test
hardware)
- Patrick Hunt
On Aug
201 - 300 of 3147 matches
Mail list logo
