Re: [ANNOUNCE] new ZooKeeper PMC member: Mate Szalay-Beko

Congrats!!! > On Mar 28, 2022, at 7:42 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > I am happy to announce that Mate Szalay-Beko has been invited to join > the Apache ZooKeeper PMC and he accepted. > > Mate is doing great work for our community. > > Please join me in congratulating with him > > Congrats

Re: Double Locking Issue

A few things... SUSPENDED in Curator means only that the connect has been lost, not that the session has ended. LOST is the state that means the session has ended Be aware of how GCs can affect Curator. See the Tech Note here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CURATOR/TN10

Re: An official API for starting ZooKeeper from a Java program

The issue is trying to start ZooKeeper programmatically. ZooKeeperServerMain assumes starting from the CLI with zoo.cfg, etc. If you want to do all that programmatically it's more difficult. What is needed is a version of ZooKeeperServerMain for programmatic use. > On Jul 1, 2020, at 3:41 PM,

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3831) Add a test that does a minimal validation of Apache Curator

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-3831: --- Summary: Add a test that does a minimal validation of Apache Curator Key: ZOOKEEPER-3831 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3831

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Mate Szalay-Beko

Congrats!!! > On Apr 3, 2020, at 3:42 AM, Andor Molnar wrote: > > The Apache ZooKeeper PMC recently extended committer karma to Mate and he has > accepted. > Mate has made some great contributions (including C client!) and we are > looking forward to even more. :) > > Congratulations and

Re: [DISCUSS] Sending 3.4 release line to End-Of-Life status

> Enrico >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Patrick >>>>> >>>>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2020 at 5:16 AM Szalay-Bekő Máté < >>>> szalay.beko.m...@gmail.com> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >

Re: ZK does not compile on JDK14 due to "java.lang.Record"

Boy - it seems it's a mistake for the JDK to have Record in the java.lang package. Putting it in a different package would fix this. I wonder if we should file a bug or bring it up on the Amber list? -Jordan > On Mar 27, 2020, at 11:26 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Let me file and INFRA

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3762) Add Client/Server API to return available features

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-3762: --- Summary: Add Client/Server API to return available features Key: ZOOKEEPER-3762 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3762 Project

Re: [DISCUSS] Sending 3.4 release line to End-Of-Life status

I'm +1 on this. We're planning to drop support for 3.4.x in the next release of Apache Curator, FYI. -Jordan > On Mar 4, 2020, at 7:36 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hi, > we are releasing 3.6.0 (I am waiting for mirrors to sync before > updating the website). > > In my opinion it is time to

Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0 candidate 4

Congrats to all. -Jordan > On Mar 3, 2020, at 4:45 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. > > There are 7 approving votes, 5 of which are binding: > > - Szalay-Bekő Máté > - Norbert Kalmar > - Enrico Olivelli (binding) > - Patrick

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.7 candidate 2

I ran Curator tests and they pass +1 (non binding) -Jordan > On Feb 10, 2020, at 6:52 AM, Norbert Kalmar wrote: > > This is the third bugfix release candidate for 3.5.7. It fixes 25 issues, > including third party CVE fixes, potential data loss and potential split > brain if some rare

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.7 candidate 1

3.5.7 is not in the staging repo. I'd like to test with Curator. https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/zookeeper/ -Jordan > On Feb 7, 2020, at 7:29 AM, Norbert Kalmar

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 2

The CURATOR-549-zk36-updates branch tests pass +1 (non binding) -Jordan > On Feb 5, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is the third release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most notably: > - Built-in data

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 1

sing Ubuntu 18.04 >>>> (incl. >>>>>> the >>>>>>> C >>>>>>>>>> client), using OpenJDK 1.8.212 >>>>>>>>>> - I also built and unit tested the python client >>>>>>>>>

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 1

No big issues with Curator that I could find +1 (non binding) -Jordan > On Feb 1, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is the second release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most notably: > - Built-in data

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 1

Maybe we can get 3.6.1 quickly after then? > On Feb 1, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is the second release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > It is a major release and it introduces a lot of new features, most notably: > - Built-in data consistency check inside

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 1

Any chance of getting https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/1229 into 3.6.0? -JZ > On Feb 1, 2020, at 10:02 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > This is the second release candidate for Apache ZooKeeper 3.6.0. > > It is a major release and it

Re: Looking for go binding

No design discussions there. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jan 31, 2020, at 1:16 PM, Giorgio Zoppi wrote: > > Hello smart people, > we are looking for binding in go, possibly with grpc communication. > Is there any working/high quality work around with zooke

Re: Looking for go binding

t; El vie., 31 ene. 2020 a las 19:55, Jordan Zimmerman (< > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>) escribió: > >> They're all my branches right now. See the doc I linked to - it has links >> to all the branches with detailed explanations. If you just want the >> latest/latest

Re: Looking for go binding

> Giorgio > > > > El vie., 31 ene. 2020 a las 19:44, Jordan Zimmerman (< > jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>) escribió: > >> There's very little change to ZooKeeper itself. All of the ZK specific >> changes are currently in the wip-jute-rpc-encapsulate m

Re: Looking for go binding

There's very little change to ZooKeeper itself. All of the ZK specific changes are currently in the wip-jute-rpc-encapsulate module and all involve removing the direct use of ByteBuffers. ZooKeeper already has an abstraction for alternate server handlers (ServerCnxnFactory and ServerCnxn) - the

Re: Looking for go binding

I've been working on gRPC for ZooKeeper. Here's is the proposal with links to the current branches I'm using. I really could use help on this so any/all interested please get involved. https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wP61nCDeLLNPdXGxHxi_MIbt7c2pCl0ttm9KMjyOisQ/edit#heading=h.200w7srpqmog

Re: Great Meetup

Very good, thank you - also thanks for working to get the remote channel up. -Jordan > On Jan 30, 2020, at 6:44 PM, David Mollitor wrote: > > Just wanted to send a note to express my gratitude for setting up the ZK > meetup @FB. I had a great time and enjoyed meeting you all. > > Belugabehr

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Enrico Olivelli new ZooKeeper PMC Member

Well deserved. Congratulations. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jan 21, 2020, at 4:40 PM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > I'm pleased to announce that Enrico Olivelli recently became the newest > ZooKeeper PMC member. Enrico has contributed immensely to this community;

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3703) Publish a Test-Jar from ZooKeeper Server

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-3703: --- Summary: Publish a Test-Jar from ZooKeeper Server Key: ZOOKEEPER-3703 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3703 Project: ZooKeeper

Re: FYI - gRPC project for ZooKeeper

Thanks Enrico. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jan 17, 2020, at 3:58 AM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Jordan, > I have been following this work and I appreciate that very much. > > Your doc draws a good picture of the status of our codebase. > > Per

FYI - gRPC project for ZooKeeper

Hello folks, I've been working on gRPC support for ZooKeeper. Please see the doc here for latest details, links to branches, etc.: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1wP61nCDeLLNPdXGxHxi_MIbt7c2pCl0ttm9KMjyOisQ/edit# Also see:

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.6.0 candidate 0

Thanks for managing this Enrico! Any chance of deploying a 3.6.0-CANDIDATE-0-SNAPSHOT (or some other similar name) so I can run Curator tests? It’s a real pain to manually insert the JAR vía Maven. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jan 15, 2020, at 1:05 PM, Enrico Olivelli wr

Re: ZooKeeper Meetup @ Facebook - Jan 29th

If there’s video conferencing available I could do a remote presention on the ideas I have for gRPC support. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jan 10, 2020, at 3:01 PM, Mohamed Jeelani wrote: > > Lets Meetup!  (Please Register at https://zkmeetup2020.splashthat.com/)

Re: ZK makes apache 2019 "top 5" projects

Fantastic Jordan Zimmerman > On Dec 12, 2019, at 3:49 AM, Flavio Junqueira wrote: > > +1, thank you all for the hard work. > > -Flavio > >> On 12 Dec 2019, at 08:36, Enrico Olivelli wrote: >> >> Yes, great. >> >

Re: Any interest in a gRPC version of ZooKeeper

t 9:25 AM, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: > > Hi Folks, > > I've written a proof of concept implementation of a ServerCnxnFactory that > implements gRPC. The goal is to make it possible to easily write ZooKeeper > clients in non-JVM languages. Using the proof of concept I was ab

Re: Releasing 3.6.0 - ALPHA or not ?

The 3.5.x-ALPHA scheme was extremely confusing for ZK's user base (doubly so given how long it remained in alpha then beta). Many companies used it anyway so adding the qualifier didn't serve much purpose. Better to leave it off and communicate known issues through standard channels. My 0.02

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3605) ZOOKEEPER-3242 add a connection throttle. Default constructor needs to set it

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-3605: --- Summary: ZOOKEEPER-3242 add a connection throttle. Default constructor needs to set it Key: ZOOKEEPER-3605 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3605

ZOOKEEPER-1416 - please validate my assumption

The Persistent/Recursive watches (ZOOKEEPER-1416) PR is ready. But, I'm concerned about an assumption I've made. I worry about event ordering regarding multiple writes from multiple clients and watchers. Here's my assumption: If you successfully set a Persistent watcher (i.e. you get

Re: [VOTE] Apache ZooKeeper release 3.5.6 candidate 4

It's required by the Apache Release process: http://www.apache.org/dev/release-distribution For every artifact distributed to the public through Apache channels, the PMC • MUST supply a valid OpenPGP-compatible ASCII-armored detached

Re: PoweredBy Zookeeper

FYI - we've had this on our wiki forever. By extension all these are powered by ZK: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CURATOR/Powered+By -Jordan > On Sep 13, 2019, at 3:21 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > Hi, > Maoling

Re: Consistency Guarantees

Isn’t this a “no true Scotsman” argument? By this definition any eventually consistent system can never be considered linearizable. Right? Jordan Zimmerman > On Aug 18, 2019, at 1:47 PM, Karolos Antoniadis wrote: > > Hi Jordan, > > When Aphyr tested Zo

Re: Consistency Guarantees

ZooKeeper _is_ linearizable. I’m pretty sure the ZAB paper talks about it. Aphyr does as well here: https://aphyr.com/posts/291-jepsen-zookeeper Jordan Zimmerman > On Aug 18, 2019, at 1:23 PM, Karolos Antoniadis wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I was wonderi

Re: thoughts about extension to multi semantics

> On Aug 17, 2019, at 4:41 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 4:01 PM Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: > >> >> >> ... >>> I don't understand that. Watches can be set in a multi. >> >> Not in the public API: >> https://

Re: thoughts about extension to multi semantics

> On Aug 17, 2019, at 2:50 PM, Ted Dunning wrote: > > > > On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 10:19 AM Jordan Zimmerman <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>> wrote: > Some thoughts: > > It doesn't really help with any of the "standard" recipes as they all need

Re: thoughts about extension to multi semantics

Some thoughts: It doesn't really help with any of the "standard" recipes as they all need to set watches. Not to open a can of worms, but if there were a firehose version of watches that could be set independently, this type of multi-op could radically simplify some of the recipes. i.e. one

Re: KIP-500: Replace ZooKeeper with a Self-Managed Metadata Quorum

given parent downward. That this is effectively impossible to do in ZooKeeper (other than using Curator) is a large hole IMO. -Jordan > On Aug 13, 2019, at 8:20 AM, Jordan Zimmerman > wrote: > > Also see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1416 > <https://issue

Re: KIP-500: Replace ZooKeeper with a Self-Managed Metadata Quorum

Also see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-1416 There are many use cases where a client wants to see all events from a given parent path down. The semantics of setting one-time watches on a single node in ZK are cumbersome

Re: Intellij Idea warning as error with -Xdoclint

I'm getting this too - FYI > On Jun 19, 2019, at 3:46 PM, Andor Molnar wrote: > > Hi Enrico, > > I have the following error message in Idea since -Xdoclint is enabled in the > main pom.xml file: > > /Users/andormolnar/git/my-zookeeper/zookeeper-jute/src/main/java/org/apache/jute/Utils.java >

Re: Time to think about a 3.6.0 release?

On Persistent/Recursive watches: I’m willing to rebase, etc if there’s confidence it will be merged. Jordan Zimmerman > On Jun 15, 2019, at 10:59 AM, Andor Molnar wrote: > > Hi Enrico! > > Very good point, I entirely support the idea. > > Questio

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.5

AFAIK, the version of ZooKeeper 3.5.5 being released is fully compatible with Curator. Please let us know if you find any issues. -Jordan > On May 21, 2019, at 10:44 AM, rammohan ganapavarapu > wrote: > > I am curious to know what are the compatible "Apache Curator" client > version for

Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache ZooKeeper 3.5.5

Maven Central shows the first version of 3.5.x as Aug 2014. Here's to a five year dev cycle :D But, of course, congrats. -JZ > On May 20, 2019, at 12:25 PM, Jeff Widman wrote: > > Congrats on dropping the "beta" tag, that's a major milestone! > > Thanks to the team for all your hard work! >

Re: Jute buffer size increasing.

The Jute buffer size is a manual setting, so it wouldn't increase by itself. If you find that you have to keep increasing it's due to a few possibilities: ZNodes with lots of children (with long names). Any 1 ZooKeeper API call is limited by jute max buffer. So, if a call to getChildren() where

Re: Question on ZK commit/patch policy.

Even on "trivial" changes having a Jira is very useful. Jira issues show up in Release Notes and when end users search for problems/solutions. Even a trivial change may be important to some user of ZooKeeper who might want to be able to check Jira to see when/why something happened. -JZ > On

Re: Question on ZK commit/patch policy.

For Curator we require a Jira. If we get a PR without a Jira we always ask them to create one. -JZ > On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. Now > with the move to gitbox we are seeing increased submissions

Re: Question on ZK commit/patch policy.

Note: we discuss this on our wiki too: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CURATOR/Submitting+Pull+Requests > On Feb 27, 2019, at 11:37 AM, Patrick Hunt wrote: > > Historically we've only committed changes that have an associated JIRA. Now > with the move to gitbox we are seeing

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-3269) Testable facade would benefit from a queueEvent() method

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-3269: --- Summary: Testable facade would benefit from a queueEvent() method Key: ZOOKEEPER-3269 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3269 Project

Re: Leader election

> Old service leader will detect network partition max 15 seconds after it > happened. If the old service leader is in a very long GC it will not detect the partition. In the face of VM pauses, etc. it's not possible to avoid 2 leaders for a short period of time. -JZ

Re: Leader election

nt may take leadership while the > current leader still unaware of the change. Is it true? > > Another follow up question. If Zookeeper can guarantee a single leader, is > it worth using it just for leader election? Maybe we can use a more > lightweight Hazelcast for example? > &g

Re: Leader election

It is not possible to achieve the level of consistency you're after in an eventually consistent system such as ZooKeeper. There will always be an edge case where two ZooKeeper clients will believe they are leaders (though for a short period of time). In terms of how it affects Apache Curator,

Re: [VOTE] Migrate ZK to Maven build

+1 (non binding) > On Apr 23, 2018, at 6:21 PM, Mohammad arshad > wrote: > > +1 > > -Original Message- > From: Andor Molnar [mailto:an...@cloudera.com] > Sent: Monday, April 23, 2018 4:43 PM > To: dev@zookeeper.apache.org > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Migrate ZK

Re: [VOTE] Upgrade 3.5 and trunk to Java8

+1 (non binding) > On Mar 22, 2018, at 12:57 PM, Andor Molnar wrote: > > Hi all, > > Let's start the vote on upgrading to Java8. > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-3002 > > *Shall we upgrade the minimum required Java version to compile and run > ZooKeeper on

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2963) standalone

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2963?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16364826#comment-16364826 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2963: - This my favorite bug of all time

Re: Criticism on ZK

> • Unlike Kafka it does not have a vibrant and huge community (merge those > PR’s please, anyone?) This is clearly true. The community was active 5 or so years ago but in the past few years it's almost non-existent. Patrick is the only active committer. It can take years (!!) and numerous

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New ZooKeeper committer: Abraham Fine

Gratz! > On Jan 30, 2018, at 1:35 PM, Brian Nixon wrote: > > Congratulations, Abe! > > On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 3:23 AM, Michelle Tan wrote: > >> Congratulations Abe! :D >> >> Regards, >> Michelle >> >> On Tue, Jan 30, 2018 at 11:18 AM, 岭秀

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2971) Create release notes for 3.5.4

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-2971: --- Summary: Create release notes for 3.5.4 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2971 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2971 Project: ZooKeeper Issue

Re: Failed: ZOOKEEPER- PreCommit Build #1427

> [exec] -1 findbugs. The patch appears to introduce 1 new Findbugs > (version 3.0.1) warnings. -- RV_RETURN_VALUE_IGNORED_NO_SIDE_EFFECT: Return value of method without side effect is ignored This findbugs warning is wrong. It's not noticing that there's on override for the

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-984) jenkins failure in testSessionMoved - NPE in quorum

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-984?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16310264#comment-16310264 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-984: FWIW - we just saw this in a 3.5.3 instance

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16267445#comment-16267445 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - [~phunt] - the ttlNodesEnabled now applies

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.5.4-beta release

> Afaict the only real blocker for the release at this point is > ZOOKEEPER-2901 - Jordan can you resolve the comments, after which we should > be good to go. LMK if there's anything I'm missing. I'll have this done in the next day or so. Please wait for me if you can! -Jordan

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16242349#comment-16242349 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - [~phunt] Anything else needed before

Re: Meetup at Cloudera

> One way we considered was > to move to a primarily chat based system rather than relying entirely on > emails. What about Gitter? It was too easy so I created this: https://gitter.im/apache/apache-zookeeper Why not use this? -Jordan

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2921) fsyncWarningThresholdMS is applied on each getChannel().force() - also needed on entire commit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16211143#comment-16211143 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2921: - Fair point - I updated the description

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2921) fsyncWarningThresholdMS is applied on each getChannel().force() - also needed on entire commit

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2921?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman updated ZOOKEEPER-2921: Description: FileTxnLog.commit() has a warning when an individual sync takes

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2921) fsyncWarningThresholdMS is applied on each getChannel().force() - also needed on entire commit

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-2921: --- Summary: fsyncWarningThresholdMS is applied on each getChannel().force() - also needed on entire commit Key: ZOOKEEPER-2921 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira

Re: Meetup at Cloudera

here: >> https://www.meetup.com/preview/Bay-Area-Cloudera- >> User-Group/events/244294554 >> >> There will be food and beer! >> >> On Wed, Oct 18, 2017, at 07:09, Benjamin Reed wrote: >>> is there still going to be a meetup tomorrow? i don

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16207880#comment-16207880 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - derp - fixed > Session ID that is negat

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16207580#comment-16207580 ] Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2901 at 10/17/17 4:34 PM

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16207580#comment-16207580 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - Default is set back to false. I really

Re: Meetup at Cloudera

Fri, Oct 13, 2017, at 11:43, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: >> OK - however, it's turning out the Oct 19 may not work for me. It depends >> on the time. The following week is much better. FYI >> >>> On Oct 13, 2017, at 8:00 PM, Abraham Fine <af...@apache.org> wrote:

Re: Meetup at Cloudera

d be great. > > I'll send out info on joining remotely as soon as its available to me. > > Thanks, > Abe > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2017, at 00:40, Jordan Zimmerman wrote: >> As usual I'd like to attend remotely if that's possible. I'm in Europe >> until the 25th thou

Re: Let's cut a ZK 3.4.11 release

I have 2 issues I'm really anxious to get in 3.4.5: https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/378 https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/332 > On Oct 13, 2017, at 8:25 PM, Enrico Olivelli wrote: > > It would be great to

Re: Meetup at Cloudera

As usual I'd like to attend remotely if that's possible. I'm in Europe until the 25th though but if it's at the right time I can present on some nice new features in Curator or possibly the work I've been doing for Persistent Watches in ZooKeeper itself. -Jordan > On Oct 11, 2017, at 1:06 AM,

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2503) Inconsistency between myid documentation and implementation

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2503?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16189920#comment-16189920 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2503: - FYI - Please consider ZOOKEEPER-2901 when

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16189858#comment-16189858 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - [~mjohnson207] - no. It wasn't checked

[jira] [Updated] (ZOOKEEPER-2907) Logged request buffer isn't useful

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman updated ZOOKEEPER-2907: Description: There are two places in the server code that log request errors

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2907) Logged request buffer isn't useful

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-2907: --- Summary: Logged request buffer isn't useful Key: ZOOKEEPER-2907 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2907 Project: ZooKeeper

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

I pulled in the build file changes and that fixed the tests - good news. So, https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/377 <https://github.com/apache/zookeeper/pull/377> is ready. -Jordan > On Sep 27, 2017, at 11:07 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.c

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

files do you have? Are there conflicting versions? (same > jar diff versions I mean). > > Patrick > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 8:57 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com > <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>> wrote: > Now I'm getting a different e

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

=org.apache.log4j.PatternLayout > On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:17 PM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com> > wrote: > > I didn't change anything. I branched from master. What should I do any ideas? > >> On Sep 27, 2017, at 1:15 PM, Patrick Hunt <ph...@apache.org >&

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

> Patrick > > On Sat, Sep 23, 2017 at 8:01 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerman.com > <mailto:jor...@jordanzimmerman.com>> wrote: > There are 4 tests throwing NPEs in Jenkins due to: > > Layout layout = Logger.getRootLogger().getAppender("CONSOL

More Jenkins problems

https://builds.apache.org/job/PreCommit-ZOOKEEPER-github-pr-build/1040/console There's some kind of ivy exception here. [exec] BUILD FAILED [exec]

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

There are 4 tests throwing NPEs in Jenkins due to: Layout layout = Logger.getRootLogger().getAppender("CONSOLE") .getLayout(); Is this a known issue? Any workaround? -Jordan > On Sep 21, 2017, at 9:17 AM, Jordan Zimmerman <jor...@jordanzimmerm

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16177575#comment-16177575 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - I'm happy to switch the default to true. I

[jira] [Created] (ZOOKEEPER-2903) Port ZOOKEEPER-2901 to 3.5.4

Jordan Zimmerman created ZOOKEEPER-2903: --- Summary: Port ZOOKEEPER-2901 to 3.5.4 Key: ZOOKEEPER-2903 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2903 Project: ZooKeeper Issue

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16175451#comment-16175451 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - There is another option here. We update

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16175342#comment-16175342 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - Update - after researching this further

[jira] [Issue Comment Deleted] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman updated ZOOKEEPER-2901: Comment: was deleted (was: The fix for this is straightforward. The hard part

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16175282#comment-16175282 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - Update: I believe I have a mechanism

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16175282#comment-16175282 ] Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2901 at 9/21/17 6:55 PM

[jira] [Commented] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16175108#comment-16175108 ] Jordan Zimmerman commented on ZOOKEEPER-2901: - The fix for this is straightforward

Re: Major issue with Container Nodes/TTL nodes!!!

gt; > Also, I merged this originally so I will work with Jordan on getting this > fixed. Let me know > when you have a write up of your proposed solution and I'll take a look. > Thanks! > > > -rgs > > > > On Sep 20, 2017 3:52 PM, "Jordan Zimmerman" &

[jira] [Resolved] (ZOOKEEPER-2902) Exhibitor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Jordan Zimmerman resolved ZOOKEEPER-2902. - Resolution: Invalid [~ANH] as we said when you opened the previous issue

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ZOOKEEPER-2902) Exhibitor

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2902?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16174810#comment-16174810 ] Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2902 at 9/21/17 2:06 PM

[jira] [Comment Edited] (ZOOKEEPER-2901) Session ID that is negative causes mis-calculation of Ephemeral Type

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ZOOKEEPER-2901?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=16174792#comment-16174792 ] Jordan Zimmerman edited comment on ZOOKEEPER-2901 at 9/21/17 1:57 PM

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >