Note that we currently have a large set of intermittent 10.8 OSX opt-only
leaks-until-shutdown with the debugger:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942102
I don't know if these will show up on 10.9 or not, or if they really matter
that much.
Andrew
- Original Message -
Do we have a formalized way to do A/B testing with telemetry? That is,
assuming that there is a telemetry probe that measures problem
symptoms and a boolean pref for turning on a potential solution, is
there a way the declare the pref as something that telemetry queries
can be constrained by so
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I've started to work on a project in my spare time to switch us to use
unified builds for C/C++ compilation. The way that unified builds work is
by using the UNIFIED_SOURCES instead of the SOURCES variable in moz.build
files.
Is for..of on live DOM nodelists supposed to correctly iterate even when
items are removed from the list? I have a testcase where this does not
seem to be working correctly:
http://jsfiddle.net/f8xzQ/
Is there a simple way to do this correctly?
--BDS
On 11/22/13 8:40 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
Is for..of on live DOM nodelists supposed to correctly iterate even
when items are removed from the list? I have a testcase where this
does not seem to be working correctly:
http://jsfiddle.net/f8xzQ/
Is there a simple way to do this correctly?
- Original Message -
From: Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org
To: John O'Duinn jodu...@mozilla.com
Cc: dev. planning dev-plann...@lists.mozilla.org,
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org, release rele...@mozilla.com
Sent: Friday, November 22, 2013 1:34:46 AM
Subject: Re: Proposed changes to
On 2013-11-21 1:12 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
(2013/11/22 2:17), Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
FWIW if this proves to be common, it's a huge problem since it would
affect our crash stats etc... :(
Well, if the problem is related to the symptom
that I observed with the use of -gsplit-dwarf option
with
On 2013-11-22 8:33 AM, Mike Hommey wrote:
On Thu, Nov 14, 2013 at 05:49:33PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
I've started to work on a project in my spare time to switch us to use
unified builds for C/C++ compilation. The way that unified builds work is
by using the UNIFIED_SOURCES instead of the
On 11/21/13 8:56 PM, Jed Davis wrote:
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 05:41:27PM -0500, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/21/13 3:15 PM, Gavin Sharp wrote:
It would be good to explore alternatives to Bonsai.
https://github.com/mozilla/mozilla-central is supposed to have full
CVS history, right?
We're
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I think this plan is generally sound. Users are moving en-masse to 10.9
with the free update, so we should focus our resources there, and keep
10.6 around to support those users that can't update for hardware
reasons. I just have one point of
Hi Andrew,
That's good to know. Thanks!
Sent from Samsung tabletAndrew McCreight amccrei...@mozilla.com wrote:Note
that we currently have a large set of intermittent 10.8 OSX opt-only
leaks-until-shutdown with the debugger:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=942102
I don't know
On 11/22/13 9:40 AM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
Is for..of on live DOM nodelists supposed to correctly iterate even when
items are removed from the list?
I believe the current behavior is identical to what would happen with an
array here. Consider http://jsfiddle.net/hpmHg/3/
The core issue
On 11/22/13 11:41 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Hmm to the best of my knowledge, we don't generate the *.i files unless
if you explicitly request them. Is that what you did in that build?
ccache obvously always generates .i files, since those are what it uses
as its cache key.
And then it
On 11/22/13 12:11 PM, Aki Sasaki wrote:
I'm not seeing this in gecko-dev; can you find this same issue in
that repo?
No, this one behaves sanely. Going to the parent of the relevant
changeset gets you to a changeset where
layout/html/forms/src/nsGfxTextControlFrame2.cpp is present, and
On 11/22/13 1:06 PM, Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 11/22/13 12:11 PM, Aki Sasaki wrote:
I'm not seeing this in gecko-dev; can you find this same issue in
that repo?
No, this one behaves sanely. Going to the parent of the relevant
changeset gets you to a changeset where
Original Message
Subject:[Planned Maintenance Notification] Tree Closure and MTV1
Office Downtime
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2013 19:34:55 -
From: notificati...@mozilla.com
Short Summary :
Due to a planned power outage in the building that hosts the
With the landing of bug 672843, the NS_ENSURE_* macros are now
considered deprecated. If you are writing code that wants to issue
warnings when methods fail, please either use NS_WARNING directly or use
the new NS_WARN_IF macro.
if (NS_WARN_IF(somethingthatshouldbetrue))
return
On Nov 22, 2013, at 12:29 PM, Ted Mielczarek wrote:
On 11/21/2013 4:56 PM, John O'Duinn wrote:
6) If a developer lands a patch that works on 10.9, but it fails somehow
on 10.7 or 10.8, it is unlikely that we would back out the fix, and we
would instead tell users to upgrade to 10.9 anyways,
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:41 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Hmm to the best of my knowledge, we don't generate the *.i files unless
if you explicitly request them. Is that what you did in that build?
ccache obvously always generates .i
On Nov 22, 2013, at 13:16, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:41 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Hmm to the best of my knowledge, we don't generate the *.i files unless
if you explicitly request them.
On 11/22/2013 12:18 PM, Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
If you are writing code that wants to issue
warnings when methods fail, please either use NS_WARNING directly or use
the new NS_WARN_IF macro.
if (NS_WARN_IF(somethingthatshouldbetrue))
return NS_ERROR_INVALID_ARG;
if
I want to explicitely disable *all* 10.7 testing (unlike mentioned on point 8)
at once by the end of Tuesday as it gains us no clear value (please help me if
I'm missing anything wrt to its value on release branches).
I would like to have this extra 10.6 machines verified in preparation for
Yes, that's right.
Moving it to back fill in low demand would make it more noticeable.
We have to have backfilling coverage tools to fix this in the coming year.
Thanks Mike.
Sent from Samsung tabletMike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:On Fri, Nov 22,
2013 at 08:33:31AM -0800, Armen Zambrano
On 2013-11-22 4:25 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 13:16, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:41 AM, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Hmm to the best of my knowledge, we don't generate the *.i
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 07:24:14PM -0500, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On 2013-11-22 4:25 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote:
On Nov 22, 2013, at 13:16, Ehsan Akhgari ehsan.akhg...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Boris Zbarsky bzbar...@mit.edu wrote:
On 11/22/13 11:41 AM, Ehsan Akhgari
Hi,
nsIBrowserDomWindow does not get recognized in C++ code, even though
nsIBrowserDomWindow.h is #included. Do I need to do anything differently
compare to other interfaces?
Thank you in advance,
Yuriy Look | Software Developer | Compuware APM
yuriy.l...@compuware.com
Are you using the correct nsIBrowserDOMWindow capitalization?
Cheers,
Josh
On 11/23/2013 09:31 AM, Look, Yuriy wrote:
Hi,
nsIBrowserDomWindow does not get recognized in C++ code, even though
nsIBrowserDomWindow.h is #included. Do I need to do anything differently
compare to other
27 matches
Mail list logo
