The gaia-icons font currently uses ligatures to place icons, see here . The
ligature character sequence is derived from the original filename of the SVG
source file in `images/`.
Is this what you were referring to?
W.
- Original Message -
From: Jet Villegas j...@mozilla.com
To:
I'm inlining to minimise cross-origin issues and to reduce requests. The entire
asset is 12k so I'm really not concerned with performance here, especially
considering the number of PNG assets this replaces. We've been using a similar
approach in Camera for quite some time and all has been well.
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 1:19 PM, Wilson Page wilsonp...@mozilla.com wrote:
Maybe I'm late to the party, but I don't know what the PUA issue is?
Code points carry semantics. If you assign meaning to unassigned code
points through fonts, you have created a portability problem. That is,
the font is
If we are using ligatures in our apps, this isn't a problem. If someone wants
to remove PUA glyphs, great! But this has no reason to block.
- Original Message -
From: Anne van Kesteren ann...@annevk.nl
To: Wilson Page wilsonp...@mozilla.com
Cc: Jonathan Kew j...@mozilla.com, Patryk
On Friday, May 30, 2014 5:14:20 AM UTC+3, avi...@gmail.com wrote:
So, wrt TART, I now took the time to carefully examine tab animation visually
on one system.
TL;DR:
- I think OMTC introduces a clearly visible regression with tab animation
compared to without OMTC.
- I _think_ it
grunt-webfont is where the magic lives :)
- Original Message -
From: Jonathan Kew j...@mozilla.com
To: Wilson Page wilsonp...@mozilla.com, Anne van Kesteren
ann...@annevk.nl
Cc: Patryk Adamczyk padamc...@mozilla.com, John Daggett
jdagg...@mozilla.com, b2g-internal
On 17/6/14 13:17, Wilson Page wrote:
If we are using ligatures in our apps, this isn't a problem. If
someone wants to remove PUA glyphs, great! But this has no reason to
block.
Right, if we're embedding the font in our apps rather than installing it
in the OS, then the PUA codepoints it
On 17/6/14 11:52, Wilson Page wrote:
I'm inlining to minimise cross-origin issues and to reduce requests.
The entire asset is 12k so I'm really not concerned with performance
here, especially considering the number of PNG assets this replaces.
We've been using a similar approach in Camera for
Starting yesterday, you will see new crash signatures for out-of-memory
crashes in crash-stats. The changes were implemented in bug 1007530, but
here's the summary:
OOM crashes are divided into three groups: known-small, known-large, and
unknown-size.
The known-small crashes will all have a
At the current time, there is four function can not be accessed outside but
required.
LossyCopyUTF16toASCII(const char16_t* aSource, nsACString aDest)
LossyAppendUTF16toASCII(nsDependentString(aSource), aDest);
CopyASCIItoUTF16(const char* aSource, nsAString aDest)
[bcc dev-tree-management]
In the continuing effort to make our testsuites more reliable, bug 995417 has
landed on inbound. This bug enforces the long-standing policy of no external
network connections in the testsuite with code: external network connections
will now crash the browser if and
On 6/17/2014 10:58 AM, luoyongg...@gmail.com wrote:
At the current time, there is four function can not be accessed outside but
required.
You may file a bug and attach a patch for these if you wish. I presume
the code you pasted below would go in nsStringAPI.h but all patches and
reviews
On 16/06/14 21:34, Jet Villegas wrote:
1. Let people use the icon fonts anywhere. (ie. like MS WingDings can be used
for this purpose)
2. The patch in bug 1008458 introduces private fonts that use the Unicode
Private Use Area (PUA) for icon glyphs.
3. Use PUA characters as per bug 1008458 but
On 06/16/2014 09:34 PM, Jet Villegas wrote:
Hi All:
We need a path forward on the deployment of Icon fonts in FxOS. The Gaia team
understandably wants to squeeze every bit of performance on their apps in v1.4:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951593
We are concerned about leaking
On 06/17/2014 06:01 PM, Wilson Page wrote:
Just to clarify: I am in favor of icon-fonts, but less baking them
into the system. Do we have perf figures comparing normal @font-face
loading (external or inlined) compared to the baked in solution?
Yeah, looked at comment 37 of bug 948856.
On 06/17/2014 06:51 PM, Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 17/6/14 17:02, Vivien Nicolas wrote:
On 06/17/2014 06:01 PM, Wilson Page wrote:
Just to clarify: I am in favor of icon-fonts, but less baking them
into the system. Do we have perf figures comparing normal @font-face
loading (external or
On 6/17/2014 8:01 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
- For xpcshell, you should set up mock servers via httpd.js (see numerous
examples in existing xpcshell tests).
I use xpcshell to drive tests for an extension that attaches to external
servers. This is all done by me and not part of any official
On 6/17/14 7:58 PM, Kent James wrote:
On 6/17/2014 8:01 AM, Nathan Froyd wrote:
- For xpcshell, you should set up mock servers via httpd.js (see
numerous examples in existing xpcshell tests).
I use xpcshell to drive tests for an extension that attaches to external
servers. This is all done
On 6/17/2014 2:22 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Hey Kent,
reading bug 995417, the crash only happens if
MOZ_DISABLE_NONLOCAL_CONNECTIONS is set, which is set only in the
testing infrastructure.
Philipp
Which is actually not ideal because it means we can end up with failures
on TBPL that
- Original Message -
On 6/17/2014 2:22 PM, Philipp Kewisch wrote:
Hey Kent,
reading bug 995417, the crash only happens if
MOZ_DISABLE_NONLOCAL_CONNECTIONS is set, which is set only in the
testing infrastructure.
Which is actually not ideal because it means we can end up with
Hi Boris.I have an issue with my addon.In Firefox F29,after debugging my add-on
i found the error message as 'ERROR: Attempt to use .WrappedJSObject in
untrusted code.Is it because of some security changes made in FF29 so that
untrusted object cannot be accessed? Could you please help me out
See my response here: http://stackoverflow.com/a/23838442/3670407
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 12:23 PM, nivesh.naramse...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Boris.I have an issue with my addon.In Firefox F29,after debugging my
add-on i found the error message as 'ERROR: Attempt to use .WrappedJSObject
in
On 6/17/14, 10:08 AM, Vivien Nicolas wrote:
That's true. Actually there are many other hacks that depends on the
fact that application are certified. So even if I would like to have
more apps as privileged apps just for the principle, it's not that
simple. And we may need to reconsider the
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 4:51 AM, Jonathan Kew j...@mozilla.com wrote:
If I'm reading bug 948856 correctly, the difference may have been somewhat
less (150ms? comment 17) when the font was inlined in the CSS using a data
URI, rather than loaded from a separate file
If we can't afford that,
Periodically, we field a request to add support for mochitest-chrome to
Android and B2G. To date, we've avoided this by pointing out ways that
mochitest-plain can be used for the same use case, which usually
involves SpecialPowers.
We have a new request for this, in the context of
I can't comment on the importance of the a-team's other priorities, or the
importance of running the tests in consideration on Android/B2G.
However, as the author of SpecialPowers.wrap, I can say that using it for
highly-involved chrome interaction should be considered Extremely Harmful.
These
On Tue, Jun 17, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Nathan Froyd froy...@mozilla.com wrote:
In the continuing effort to make our testsuites more reliable, bug 995417 has
landed on inbound. This bug enforces the long-standing policy of no external
network connections in the testsuite with code: external
27 matches
Mail list logo
