Mike Hommey wrote:
the biggest number of changesets pushed by someone without a backout in the
last 25271 changesets is 126.
But what's their Try usage like?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
On Thursday, April 23, 2015 at 11:47:14 PM UTC-4, voracity wrote:
Just out of curiosity, is there an equivalent of:
python -m SimpleHTTPServer
in the TLS world currently, or is any progress being made towards that?
openssl req -new -x509 -newkey rsa:2048 -keyout key.pem -out cert.pem
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mike Hoye mh...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to discuss
detailed topics in a small real-time setting. If there are community
members who are well-prepared for this
On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to discuss
detailed topics in a small real-time setting. If there are community
members who are well-prepared for this discussion, I don't see why
they couldn't be participants.
There's no
On Friday, April 24, 2015 at 1:03:00 AM UTC-4, butrus...@gmail.com wrote:
On Monday, April 13, 2015 at 4:57:58 PM UTC+2, Richard Barnes wrote:
There's pretty broad agreement that HTTPS is the way forward for the web.
In recent months, there have been statements from IETF [1], IAB [2], W3C
On 2015-04-24 10:14 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 7:05 AM, Mike Hoye mh...@mozilla.com
mailto:mh...@mozilla.com wrote:
On 2015-04-24 12:07 AM, Eric Rescorla wrote:
Who said anything about excluded? It's simply much easier to
discuss detailed topics in a
This message is about bug 917999 - Split test package into per-suite
packages, more can be found there.
I'm working on a set of patches to do this, but the assumption that a build
comes with a tests.zip that has all of the tests to run against that
build seems likely to be a part of more tools
I think this discussion has moved a bit off topic.
Let's all assume that if the intent was to gather public feedback by a post
in the newsgroup that a similar intent of having a meeting with interested
participant would include a good sampling of people with interest, and that
their employment
tl;dr:
We plan to enable Pointer Events for mouse and pen input in Firefox Nightly
builds within the next few weeks.
Background:
Pointer Events is a W3C recommendation that defines new DOM events for unified
handling of mouse, touch, and pen input. It also defines a new 'touch-action'
CSS
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 2:56:21 PM UTC+2, Gervase Markham wrote:
Very briefly:
On 21/04/15 12:43, Roger Hågensen wrote:
1. User downloads a browser (be it Firefox, Chrome, Opera, etc.)
securely (https?) from the official download location. 2. Upon
installation a private key is
On Tuesday, April 21, 2015 at 3:56:31 PM UTC+2, Mike Hoye wrote:
On 2015-04-21 6:43 AM, Roger Hågensen wrote:
I know, not that well explained and over simplified. But the concept
is hopefully clear, but in case it's not...
For what it's worth, a lot of really smart people have been thinking
On 24/04/2015 04:02, Martin Thomson wrote:
On Thu, Apr 23, 2015 at 12:33 PM, e...@mozilla.com wrote:
Do you have suggestions on where each of the 4 topics I posted
should be discussed?
In a meeting, where a small number of participants are
well-prepared.
[qoute]We were asked to involve
This is a digression, but it touches on an important question that
others are asking in response to this general push [1].
Fundamentally, better client authentication doesn't do anything to
help make the web a more secure place (in any of the dimensions that
we're primarily concerned about in
在 2015年4月25日星期六 UTC+8上午3:28:02，David Rajchenbach-Teller写道：
By the way, I don't know if you're writing JS code or C++ code, but if
it's the former, you really should use Sqlite.jsm.
Yes, I was using Javascript code, maybe that's was the cause of failure.
Cheers,
David
On 24/04/15 18:48,
I am currently using executeAsync to do async sqlite operation
in main thread, and running multiple executeAsync in parallel, and it's
crashed,
I am not so sure if multiple executeAsync can be executed at the same time.
___
dev-platform mailing list
On 04/24/2015 12:48 PM, Yonggang Luo wrote:
I am currently using executeAsync to do async sqlite operation
in main thread, and running multiple executeAsync in parallel, and it's
crashed,
I am not so sure if multiple executeAsync can be executed at the same time.
This is fine. The
By the way, I don't know if you're writing JS code or C++ code, but if
it's the former, you really should use Sqlite.jsm.
Cheers,
David
On 24/04/15 18:48, Yonggang Luo wrote:
I am currently using executeAsync to do async sqlite operation
in main thread, and running multiple executeAsync in
Hello all,
We wrote last quarter a project called Mozilla CI tools (mozci) which
allows triggering jobs on treeherder. [1]
This is specially useful for back-filling jobs (specially when
coalesced) and bisecting via job triggering.
Specifically, I want to bring to your attention a use case
Are you going to build a web UI for this so I don't need to check out a
repo and run a python script with syntax that I'll likely need to look
up every time I want to do it, guessing builder names that I don't know?
(don't get me wrong, I could probably use it if I needed to, but it's
harder
19 matches
Mail list logo
