nsIDownloadManagerUI has had an aUsePrivateUI parameter added to its
show() method. However, it gets passed in an id, which makes no sense in
per-window private browsing i.e. if aUsePrivateUI is set then you can't
actually find out which download has just started.
I also see that nsIDownloadMa
Nathan Froyd wrote:
If you have objections to this change, please speak up, either here or in bug
794178.
set NSPR_LOG_FILE=WinDebug
is currently the only way to get assertions and warnings logged in the
debugger output window. (Other output, such as dump(), is special-cased.)
--
Warning:
Bobby Holley wrote:
In the long term, I'd like for Xray wrappers to behave more logically with
respect to the prototype chain than they have in the past.
Some nodes, such as HTMLImageElement nodes, expose more properties on
their "Xray" wrappers than on their content wrappers. Does this apply
Bobby Holley wrote:
You can do things like "new contentWindow.XMLHttpRequest"
That's a good example, thanks.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-
Bobby Holley wrote:
In the long term, I'd like for Xray wrappers to behave more logically with
respect to the prototype chain than they have in the past. I believe that Peter
has already taken the first step by giving us meaningful Xrays to DOM
prototypes and interface objects
What does mean
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/30/12 4:43 PM, Neil wrote:
(I would actually expect the proto of an Xray for a content object to
be an [xpconnect wrapped native prototype]
If you expect that for WebIDL objects... you're going to be
disappointed. ;)
Yeah, well I still wish Xrays had
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Alternately, we could do something where the proto chain of an Xray
for a content object passes through the corresponding chrome
prototypes, not through Xrays for the content window's prototypes.
That would presumably make "el instanceof
el.ownerDocument.defaultView.HTML
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/28/12 3:54 AM, Neil wrote:
How does removing nsIDOM* stuff without removing nsIDOMNode reduce
memory usage
There are elements that implement multiple nsIDOM*, last I checked.
But if you're keeping nsIDOMNode, then you might as well keep the most
po
Neil wrote:
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Unfortunately, that's not how instanceof works in JS. Try it with
Object instead of HTMLAnchorElement...
Making foo instanceof Array false across globals was an
extension-breaking change when it happened. Fortunately we have
Array.isArray these days.
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
Unfortunately, that's not how instanceof works in JS. Try it with
Object instead of HTMLAnchorElement...
Making foo instanceof Array false across globals was an
extension-breaking change when it happened. Fortunately we have
Array.isArray these days.
--
Warning: May c
Justin Dolske wrote:
On 12/27/12 3:33 PM, Neil wrote:
Justin Dolske wrote:
What happens today (and in the future), with something like:
// Hello, I am chrome code adding an anchor to content
var noob = document.createElement("a");
gBrowser.contentDocument.body.appendChild(n
Jonas Sicking wrote:
There's nothing special about XPCOM objects here.
While this is clearly true, I still feel it's getting away from my
original point, because I was trying to compare with nsCOMArray.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
On 12/27/12 1:54 PM, Neil wrote:
Presumably this involves completely removing all XPIDL DOM interfaces
from HTML nodes, thus saving one vtable entry per node?
There are cases in which we can remove nsIDOM* stuff without removing
nsIDOMNode/Element/HTMLElement. Which
Justin Dolske wrote:
What happens today (and in the future), with something like:
// Hello, I am chrome code adding an anchor to content
var noob = document.createElement("a");
gBrowser.contentDocument.body.appendChild(noob);
If you're lucky, you append a XUL element to the content docu
Jonas Sicking wrote:
On Dec 18, 2012 4:15 AM, "Neil" wrote:
While investigating the possibility of switching nsCOMArray away from
nsVoidArray it occurred to me that nsCOMArray takes steps to ensure internal
consistency before releasing removed elements; this is because it
Boris Zbarsky wrote:
We have a bunch of chrome and extension code that does things like
"instanceof HTMLAnchorElement" (and likewise with other DOM interfaces).
c-c MXR suggests 305 cases of "instanceof HTML.*Element". There are also
18 "instanceof XUL.*Element, 13 "instanceof Element", 14 "i
David Rajchenbach-Teller wrote:
On 12/20/12 7:27 AM, Ray You wrote:
How can we start a real thread in gecko using javascript and use XPCOM in it?
Is dispatching events to /nsIStreamTransportService/ or
/nsIThreadManager.newThread(0) /the right way?
I don't think this is supported anym
Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 12/18/2012 11:05 AM, Neil wrote:
While looking at tbsaunde's patch to remove the nsISupportsArray
version of NS_NewArrayEnumerator I noticed that many users of
NS_NewArrayEnumerator copy entries from a hash into a temporary array
which they then enumerate,
While looking at tbsaunde's patch to remove the nsISupportsArray version
of NS_NewArrayEnumerator I noticed that many users of
NS_NewArrayEnumerator copy entries from a hash into a temporary array
which they then enumerate, which works by creating an instance of an
enumerator class that recopie
While investigating the possibility of switching nsCOMArray away from
nsVoidArray it occurred to me that nsCOMArray takes steps to ensure
internal consistency before releasing removed elements; this is because
it's potentially possible for Release() to invoke arbitrary code; if
this code ends u
Jonathan Kew wrote:
On 11/12/12 10:51, Neil wrote:
Neil wrote:
Jonathan Kew wrote:
You shouldn't normally see a flash of fallback text unless the font
is particularly slow to load; the text should be invisible until
the font is available. We aim to hide the text until the font is
Neil wrote:
Jonathan Kew wrote:
You shouldn't normally see a flash of fallback text unless the font
is particularly slow to load; the text should be invisible until the
font is available. We aim to hide the text until the font is ready,
unless it takes more than a few seconds to load.
ppropriate.
-- Neil
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Jonathan Kew wrote:
You shouldn't normally see a flash of fallback text unless the font is
particularly slow to load; the text should be invisible until the font
is available. We aim to hide the text until the font is ready, unless
it takes more than a few seconds to load. (The timeout is conf
John Daggett wrote:
Last time I looked, Webkit caches activated fonts, so the second time the UA
loads the same font (e.g. in a different document) it will be shown immediately
without fallback content first.
Ah, so that explains the fallback flash I experience on a site I
frequent that make
Blake Kaplan wrote:
Neil wrote:
static const PRUnichar* kResetBackupDirectory =
NS_LITERAL_STRING("resetBackupDirectory").get();
Isn't this an anti-pattern anyway because the string (and the memory owned by it) will
get destructed after the semicolon
On a side note, what can we do about checking for unusually verbose or
inefficient constructs? Examples:
static const PRUnichar* kResetBackupDirectory =
NS_LITERAL_STRING("resetBackupDirectory").get();
This is technically incorrect on systems that don't support a 16-bit
char type (short wcha
Gregory Szorc wrote:
https://tbpl.mozilla.org/?tree=Mozilla-Inbound&rev=7f5e2a9addff
http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/pushloghtml?changeset=7f5e2a9addff
http://hg.mozilla.org/integration/mozilla-inbound/rev/ba730945bc6d
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=815219
--
W
Kyle Huey wrote:
The IID of nsIDOMHTMLInputElement changed from Gecko 16 to Gecko 17. You are
probably compiling against headers for Gecko 16.
How does bug 813264 affect this?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
d
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 12:14 PM, Neil wrote:
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Neil wrote:
Is there any way we can make it so that the prefixed version doesn't work
unless you attempt (and presumably fail) to detect the unpre
jim.math...@gmail.com wrote:
Key notes -
* The 8.0 SDK requires Windows 7 (or Windows Server 2008 R2)
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platf
Robert O'Callahan wrote:
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 8:37 PM, Jeff Walden wrote:
We ended up removing the nested |using| above and making all SpiderMonkey
headers qualify everything with mozilla::. We use few enough things from
mozilla:: so far that we switched to |using mozilla::RangedPtr| an
Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Fri, Nov 9, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Neil wrote:
Is there any way we can make it so that the prefixed version doesn't work
unless you attempt (and presumably fail) to detect the unprefixed version?
What purpose would the prefix serve in such a scenario?
Aryeh Gregor wrote:
Currently we only check that no test fails that's not on the per-file whitelist
of expected fails, and in practice that works fine for us. If we wanted to be
pickier, we could list all expected results, both pass and fail, and verify
that the lists exactly match. This is
Is there any way we can make it so that the prefixed version doesn't
work unless you attempt (and presumably fail) to detect the unprefixed
version?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
h
Joshua Cranmer wrote:
On 10/21/2012 12:31 PM, Neil wrote:
While reviewing a patch that had to call into login manager from C++
I noticed that we don't have an RAII class for handling the array
outparam. Would one be appreciated? I have written something that I
call nsXPIDLArray, whi
While reviewing a patch that had to call into login manager from C++ I
noticed that we don't have an RAII class for handling the array
outparam. Would one be appreciated? I have written something that I call
nsXPIDLArray, which so far has the following features:
* Most of the work handled b
Tim Taubert wrote:
Nobody likes running debug builds because they're slower
I always run debug builds. What does that make me? ;-)
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.moz
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
use a better revision control system
Or a better file system perhaps ;-)
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Nicholas Nethercote wrote:
On Thu, Oct 4, 2012 at 10:18 AM, Justin Lebar wrote:
1) Build errors are hard to identify with make. Parallel execution can make
them even harder to track down. Poor output from invoked processes is also a
problem.
I have a script [1] which works well en
Nathan Froyd wrote:
IMHO, the current state of affairs for bug 792169 is a little ugly, insofar as
you do:
#include "nsArray.h"
...
nsCOMPtr = nsArray::Create();
...
I can certainly see the advantages of
#include "nsIMutableArray.h"
...
nsCOMPtr array = NewIArray();
[I'm assuming here
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
There might be times where you want the concrete type of the thing
that your ctor function returns to be opaque, in which case it might
make sense to go with the NS_NewFoo style of method.
That might even apply here, since my understanding was that mutable
arrays need to
Neil wrote:
Also, you might find you actually need to grant permission on a
containing folder.
Actually, it looks as if wmiprvse.exe doesn't inherit permissions, and
it should have the following permissions, or at least, this is the
output of CACLS %windir%\system32\wbem\wmiprvse.exe
Clint Talbert wrote:
On 9/26/2012 8:32 AM, Armen Zambrano G. wrote:
On 12-09-26 6:45 AM, Neil wrote:
Perhaps the file system permissions are incorrect and NT
AUTHORITY\NETWORK SERVICE doesn't have permission to access
C:\WINDOWS\system32\wbem\wmiprvse.exe ?
You might be right.
How
Henri Sivonen wrote:
I had
void operator=(const jArray& other)
where jArray is a struct and
void operator=(L zero)
where L is in practice int32_t and argument zero is only ever 0.
void operator=(L zero) {
// Make assigning null to an array in Java delete the buffer in C++
Armen Zambrano G. wrote:
Hi all,
Recently we've set up some new XP slaves that fail on mochitest jobs
due to this error:
"ERROR: Logon failure: unknown user name or bad password."
Unfortunately, I have not been able what is triggering that error (I
can't find the strings in our code).
If y
Paul Rouget wrote:
For the Firefox Developer Tools, we need to be able to hide the scrollbars of a document
(in the "Responsive Design Tool").
Scrollbars are native anonymous content so most stylesheets just don't
see them (the obvious exception is of course
chrome://global/skin/scrollbars
Henri Sivonen wrote:
Use case: Catching nullptr assignment in operator=.
That's not a very enlightening description of a use case... which
overloads do you already have, and which one is the compiler using when
you don't want it to?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
Blair McBride wrote:
On 5/09/2012 6:13 a.m., Gregory Szorc wrote:
$ hg status -u | grep .egg-info | xargs rm -rf
$ git ls-files -o '*.egg-info*' | xargs rm -rf
Those of you on Windows will notice this doesn't work, thanks to
Windows-style paths. The following will:
$ hg status -un | grep
Justin Lebar wrote:
%{C++
inline int32_t GetFoo() {
int32_t result;
nsresult rv = GetFoo(&result);
MOZ_ASSERT(NS_SUCCEEDED(rv));
return result;
}
%}
Alternative approach?
inline int32_t Foo(int32_t result = 0) {
GetFoo(&result);
return result;
}
--
Warning: May contain
Justin Lebar wrote:
So now you can do
nsCOMPtr foo;
int32_t f = foo->GetFoo();
Why was I expecting this to be Foo()? (Perhaps unreasonably.)
I rejected the first approach because it meant that every call to GetFoo from
XPCOM would need to go through two virtual calls: GetFoo(int32_t*) an
Makoto Kato wrote:
How about PRUptrdiff? Most cases can changes to uintptr_t.
Which surprised me, but then I guess NSPR didn't have a true uintptr_t type.
I did find one use of PRUptrdiff that should have been size_t though.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
__
Gregory Szorc wrote:
We want feedback on the file format to use for the new build manifest
files.
Is there a good reason to shoehorn everything into a single file format?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-plat
Gregory Szorc wrote:
Up until now, the focus has been on making Makefile.in's themselves
generic and data-driven. We would use pymake's API to parse, load, and
extract data from Makefile.in's to construct the build definition. In
the long run, we'd realize that using make files for data defini
Benjamin Smedberg wrote:
On 8/20/2012 9:25 AM, sebastiang...@gmail.com wrote:
Am Dienstag, 1. Februar 2011 06:16:50 UTC+1 schrieb johnjbarton:
I recall reading some rumors about Components.utils.import being
cached in such a way that devs can't change the source and see
changes. Any truth t
Malintha Adikari wrote:
I want to access system variable in Windows OS from my firebug extension. Can I
do that ? Is it possible to access OS system variables inside the chrome
JavaScript ?
Did you mean environment variable? In that case use
https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/XPCOM_I
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
On the testharness.js side, we have things like assert_regexp_match,
for example. I would argue that whether or not assert_regexp_match(a,
/foo/, "msg") is more readable than ok(/foo/.match(a), "msg") is very
subjective and depends on what the author of the test is used t
Dave Townsend wrote:
On 08/15/12 12:41, Ben Hearsum wrote:
On 08/15/12 02:57 PM, Justin Wood (Callek) wrote:
XULRunner is currently an unsupported piece of software, we don't
run tests for it, and we *barely* ensure it still builds.
I don't think this is true. It's not tier1, but we ship i
Since I don't have Vista, I haven't really been able to look at bug
524337, but recently I installed a VM with Windows 8 Preview so I was
able to see what was going on.
On Windows the outer textbox is styled with the textbox appearance,
which is handled by the native theme code.
In Windows c
Masayuki Nakano wrote:
On 2012/08/13 4:57, Neil wrote:
it seems as if you can't make the wheel scroll more slowly any more?
Currently, yes. The reason for not supporting slower scrolling isn't
technical reason. It needs some additional code. E.g., 0.5px scroll
isn't suppo
Masayuki Nakano wrote:
By the changes, some prefs of mousewheel.* don't make sense now. They
are replaced with new prefs:
*
mousewheel.(horizscroll.)?(withshiftkey|withaltkey|withmetakey|withcontrolkey|withnokey).sysnumlines
Just removed.
*
mousewheel.(horizscroll.)?(withshift
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
So, PRIntn should be converted to int and PRUintn to unsigned, is that
correct?
Yes please.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/
Mike Hommey wrote:
That PRIntn is int is an implementation detail. The intent when using int and
int32_t/PRInt32 is different. We should keep it that way.
Yes, this is roughly what I was trying to say*, I just couldn't think of
the word "intent" at the time. Thanks!
*The intent when using
Mike Hommey wrote:
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 09:24:57AM +0100, Neil wrote:
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
PRIntn -> int32_t
PRUintn -> uint32_t
http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/prtypes.h#385
typedef int PRIntn;
typedef unsigned int PRUintn;
What
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
PRIntn -> int32_t
PRUintn -> uint32_t
http://mxr.mozilla.org/comm-central/source/mozilla/nsprpub/pr/include/prtypes.h#385
typedef int PRIntn;
typedef unsigned int PRUintn;
...
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-pl
Justin Lebar wrote:
rendering literal < and > characters inside instead of < and >
That would make it difficult to put a literal "" inside a
block though.
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mo
Ben Hearsum wrote:
Windows fails to compile:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=779910
How do these builds differ from stock Firefox builds, is it just the
.mozconfig?
--
Warning: May contain traces of nuts.
___
dev-platform mailing lis
Jean-Marc Desperrier wrote:
BTW the last time I had Seamonkey use all the 32-bits adress space,
the result was *really* bad. A system down to it's knees, and not able
to close the Seamonkey process anymore. It's harder to get the same
thing with Firefox, the lazy tab opening helps :-)
You ca
sali...@gmail.com wrote:
My use case is, I have RPC listener in addon, which is called from some other application. On receiving of RPC event, I need to load a specific URL to the browser. For this I need nsIWebNavigation object in RPC handler.
If there is a way to load the URL to the browser
sali...@gmail.com wrote:
I have gone through the document
"https://developer.mozilla.org/en/XPCOM/Making_cross-thread_calls_using_runnables";,
which tells about how to run a method asynchronously. I hove no issue in calling the a
method asynchronously. I have problem in sharing the object bet
301 - 370 of 370 matches
Mail list logo
