Taskcluster index: gecko.v1 routes are going away

2016-09-30 Thread Michael Shal
Hi all, Builds will no longer publish to the gecko.v1 namespace in the Taskcluster index. Please use gecko.v2 for any future projects that need to find artifacts in Taskcluster. Feel free to contact me with any questions! Thanks, -Mike ___

Want to learn TLS certificate verification best practices

2016-09-30 Thread Ben Cottrell
Hi all, I'm working on an (unfortunately closed-source) project that needs to closely approximate the behavior of an actual web browser, in the limited scope of making HTTPS connections and accurately warning about certificate problems. So I need to learn about "what real browsers do" and it

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Friday 2016-09-30 14:02 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > Also, just found this in the charter: > announcement > Not really acceptable. I think it should link to the same URL as the other "(announcement)" link. -David -- 턞 L. David Baron http://dbaron.org/ 턂 턢

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread Tantek Çelik
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:51 PM, L. David Baron wrote: > On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: >> > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely >> > success: >> > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import;

Re: hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
On 2016/10/01 4:23, Ralph Giles wrote: The change was announced here and on firefox-dev a few weeks ago. See for example https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/LOC83qKUPfk/cZtmaEbOAwAJ Obviously I missed it during a busy trip. Thank you. (It would be nice to have the

Re: hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread Ralph Giles
On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Gregory Szorc wrote: > `mach mercurial-setup` does an `hg pull` from hg.mozilla.org to obtain the > version-control-tools repository, which is where most of the logic for `mach > mercurial-setup` lives (because we have a nice testing harness in

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: Web Platform Working Group

2016-09-30 Thread L. David Baron
On Thursday 2016-09-29 07:46 -0700, Tantek Çelik wrote: > > Marked as deliverables to be taken up if incubation suggests likely success: > > Background Synchronisation; Filesystem API; FindText API; HTML Import; > > Input Methods; Packaging; Quota API > > This section is confusing and weakly

Re: hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread Gregory Szorc
`mach mercurial-setup` does an `hg pull` from hg.mozilla.org to obtain the version-control-tools repository, which is where most of the logic for `mach mercurial-setup` lives (because we have a nice testing harness in version-control-tools). `mach mercurial-setup` doesn't pin the hash when

Re: hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread Ralph Giles
The change was announced here and on firefox-dev a few weeks ago. See for example https://groups.google.com/d/msg/mozilla.dev.platform/LOC83qKUPfk/cZtmaEbOAwAJ It might be nice if `mach mercurial-setup` did this kind of update? -r On Fri, Sep 30, 2016 at 12:18 PM, ISHIKAWA,chiaki

hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint changed?

2016-09-30 Thread ISHIKAWA,chiaki
In the last few days, hg.mozilla.org certificate fingerprint seems to have changed. I noticed this because the trial to update local copy of mozilla-central repository within C-C repository failed due to m-central/mozilla', 'https://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/'] pulling from

Heads Up: Mac CFMessagePort/CFPasteboardSetup Error Messages

2016-09-30 Thread Haik Aftandilian
Since the integration of bug 1299329 ​[1] ​ ​in Nightly, these error messages are printed to the terminal and system.log so you'll see them when running Firefox from the command line on Mac. ​They are not known to cause any browser issues so you can ignore them. These are due to sandbox

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-09-30 Thread Benjamin Francis
On 30 September 2016 at 11:31, Gabriele Svelto wrote: > Since gonk is a widget on its own, during the internal discussions about > it I - and others who worked on B2G - repeatedly asked for the gonk > widget to be left in the code even after the removal of all the >

Re: Removal of B2G from mozilla-central

2016-09-30 Thread Gabriele Svelto
On 30/09/2016 06:04, Chris Peterson wrote: > Is Gonk used anywhere besides B2G? Can we remove all Gonk code, e.g. > dom/camera/Gonk* and #ifdef MOZ_WIDGET_GONK? Gonk is not used anywhere else, some of it's code was merged with Fennec's code to reduce the maintenance burden but there's still quite