On Monday, January 25, 2016 at 8:38:08 AM UTC-8, Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
> Hi Fabrice,
>
> On 2016-01-25 11:00 AM, Fabrice Desré wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> >With the smartphone activity shifting to a more exploratory status, we
> > have been discussing with the platform & releng people which setup
It’s not a simple thing to just merge the code bases. It’s going to cause a
bunch of work in Release which we’re just not signed up for. In our planning
for 2016, I will add this to what we’d like to do — but no promises as there
are lots of high priority things we need to get done.
Doug
going to futz with it.
Doug
> On Nov 6, 2015, at 9:20 AM, Doug Turner <do...@mozilla.com> wrote:
>
> It’s not a simple thing to just merge the code bases. It’s going to cause a
> bunch of work in Release which we’re just not signed up for. In our planning
> for 2016, I will
Thunderbird is under supported and potentially harmful (as Brian Smith pointed
out on the mozilla-dev-security-policy back in Sept). Before merging c-c into
m-c, I think we should have agreement on what kind of support the mozilla
project and foundation is going to give to Thunderbird.
I
For security reasons, we will be making changes to third-party application
access for Mozilla organizations on GitHub. This means that GitHub applications
not run by Mozilla will have to go through a more formal approval process by
Mozilla GitHub organization owners before they are added (not
On May 6, 2015, at 7:30 AM, Tantek Çelik tan...@cs.stanford.edu wrote:
Not pure vandalism. The user data loss is a side-effect of other incentives.
E.g. trivial attacker incentive: all those share-button-happy
news/media sites are likely to auto-copy URL + title of an article
you're
One thing I should point out is that binary components in B2G are NOT user
installable. Instead, binaries components are used by companies building
FirefoxOS devices.
For example, Qualcomm has some special implementation for Geolocation and the
radio interface layer (RIL). When a company
On May 5, 2015, at 12:55 PM, Jonas Sicking jo...@sicking.cc wrote:
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Valentin Gosu valentin.g...@gmail.com
wrote:
As some of you may know, Rust is approaching its 1.0 release in a couple of
weeks. One of the major goals for Rust is using a rust library in
I doubt that's what roc was suggesting. But it's hard to say more without
more details on the said overall strategy.
I think this is an interesting idea and we should look into how much effort it
is to add support for this usb security key.
And, I think we can go a long way in fixing the
Congrats Benjamin.
Good luck Nathan!
On Aug 26, 2014, at 10:20 AM, Benjamin Smedberg benja...@smedbergs.us wrote:
Over the past year, Nathan Froyd has been an excellent peer for the XPCOM
code module, providing thoughtful and fast reviews and guidance. I'm happy
and excited to hand over
Did we ever reach agreement about moving gaia into m-c? It would make this
type of problem go away, and make regression range hunting much easier.
On Aug 13, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Edwin Wong edw...@mozilla.com wrote:
Hi dev-platform,
TL;DR - Cloud Services and Quality Engineering would like
Anyways, now that gaia revisions are tied to m-c revisions with
b2g/config/gaia.json, regression range hunting should be a matter of
tooling around that, now.
That is excellent news.
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
+1 to breaking licensing dogma in favor of innovation + moving faster.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:55 PM, Bobby Holley bobbyhol...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 9:47 PM, Andreas Gal andreas@gmail.com wrote:
Vlad asked a specific question in the first email. Are we comfortable
Want to move to github?
(0) sudo apt-get install python-setuptools
(1) sudo easy_install hg-git
(2) add |hggit =| under [extensions] in your .hgrc file
(3) Go to GitHub.com and create your new repo.
(4) cd hg_repo
(5) hg bookmark -r default master
(6) hg push git+ssh://g...@github.com/you/name of
I am. (or someone on my team will)
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
As you may know, some of us have been experimenting with a location service for
mozilla. We've blogged about it in the past and you can find more information
here: https://location.services.mozilla.com/
One of the interesting things is that we can use this data to provide location
based
I think we fixed this with:
http://hg.mozilla.org/mozilla-central/rev/49e797ce0f22
On Nov 14, 2013, at 9:34 AM, John Cook johncook...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm trying to manually or programmatically set the geo.wifi.uri for
testing purposes. I've tried to do this several different ways to
Nothing. Just time. Patches accepted.
On Oct 29, 2013, at 6:26 AM, Henri Sivonen hsivo...@hsivonen.fi wrote:
Not mapping Web Notifications to native notifications seems very
unfortunate, since it means Web apps can't use Web Notifications to
get a native experience.
Is there a summary of
. Keep it up!
Doug Turner wrote:
When will you implement `mach fix-my-assigned-bugs`?
Gregory Szorc wrote:
$ mach mercurial-setup
___
dev-platform mailing list
dev-platform@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/dev-platform
Intent to implement seems premature. Why wouldn't we wait to see how
this goes and let Google do that. I really dislike the idea of rushing
into this API.
A programatic API that does something like AppCache is a good idea --
only in that it is better than the declarative shit AppCache is.
Do you think that NC is the right soluction here?
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
Offline not working seems like the #1 problem
of the web platform,
There are lots of problems with the web platform. Offline support is
one of them, yes. :)
so working on this API does not really feel
premature
Implementation detail, but I presume that you will also replace the
existing appcache impl with NC, right?
Ehsan Akhgari wrote:
Offline not working seems like the #1 problem
of the web platform, so working on this API does not really feel
premature to me.
Has a developer investigated? Steven, do you know anything about this?
doug
Chris AtLee wrote:
Hi!
Leak tests on OSX have been failing intermittently for nearly a year
now[1]. As yet, we don't have any ideas why they're failing, and nobody
is working on fixing them.
Would anybody be very
time to investigate this for the foreseeable
future. I'm already dealing with one very difficult (and possibly
intractable) tests bug
(https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=884471), and that's more
than enough at one time :-(
Doug Turner mailto:doug.tur...@gmail.com
July 15, 2013 2:07 PM
Has
Gavin Sharp wrote:
On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 3:29 PM, David Rajchenbach-Teller
dtel...@mozilla.com wrote:
I don't understand when we wouldn't use this service. At the moment, we
capture thumbnails for all pages, so if we do not change that strategy,
the sandbox would effectively double at
Justin Dolske wrote:
Yikes, this is crappy. The OS only asks once, and then your choice is
(permanently?) stored in Preferences -- Security Privacy -- Location
Services. I had to google to find this, as Safari just silently passes
on a failure to the site. I seriously wonder if we should
In Bug 874587, we are considering using Core Location as the default
geolocation provider on the Mac. This would replace the use of the
NetworkGeolocationProvider (that currently points to GLS). After code
reviews, we plan to enable this on Nightly and see how it goes.
On Android, we
I think if we need to find reasons to keep a meeting relevant, we need
to kill the meeting. Lawrence, you should just discontinue the meeting
for a few weeks and see if we really need it. I bet we wont.
I would much rather see us spend the time to curate what's important --
what platform
Lawrence Mandel wrote:
However, I have had people tell me that they do get some value from this
meeting.
What value did they get and what role did they have at mozilla? I am
wondering if the audience for this meeting is no longer mozilla platform
engineers.
29 matches
Mail list logo
