Blair McBride wrote:
I'd like to see the removal of the modelines also. A root config file
is much cleaner.
For the widest possible support of editors, I'd love to see a root
.editorconfig file. See http://editorconfig.org/ - it's an
editor-neutral config, with plugins for many editors/IDEs
On Wed, Jan 8, 2014 at 9:25 AM, ishikawa ishik...@yk.rim.or.jp wrote:
BTW, do java or javascript programmers use Eclipse with its built-in editor
with suitable editor configuration,
and that is the end of the story for such Eclipse users when they tinker
with Mozilla source code?
I use
BTW, do java or javascript programmers use Eclipse with its built-in editor
with suitable editor configuration,
and that is the end of the story for such Eclipse users when they tinker
with Mozilla source code?
Android Background Services are developed in a separate git repo that we
then
On 1/8/14 1:08 PM, Garrett Robinson wrote:
Can an emacs modeline execute arbitrary elisp?
It can if it uses certain modeline features.
The default behavior of emacs is to silently apply the modelines that
don't use those features and for the ones to do not apply them unless
the user explicitly
On 08/01/14 15:04, Chris Peterson wrote:
1. Finish bikeshedding coding style
2. Update official style guide (owner=bsmedberg?)
3. Add style config files for vim/emacs/clang-format in mozilla-central
4. Reformat mozilla-central code (piecemeal or big bang)
5. Remove modelines from
(2013/09/10 19:17), ishikawa wrote:
[ omissions ]
I am getting the hang of emacs mode line.
/* -*- Mode: javascript; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil;
c-basic-offset: 2 ; js-indent-level : 2 ; js-curly-indent-offset: 0 -*- */
/* vim: set ts=2 et sw=2 tw=80: */
seem to do the job.
On Wed, Jan 08, 2014 at 10:23:28AM +0900, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
(2013/09/10 19:17), ishikawa wrote:
[ omissions ]
I am getting the hang of emacs mode line.
/* -*- Mode: javascript; tab-width: 8; indent-tabs-mode: nil;
c-basic-offset: 2 ; js-indent-level : 2 ;
On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 5:38 PM, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Also, afaik, vim modelines are mostly useless, since
vim doesn't use them by default anyways
I enable them, and as long as we have some files with 2-space indents
and some with 4-space indents I will continue to find them
On 2014-01-07, at 17:38, Mike Hommey m...@glandium.org wrote:
Do we need so much boilerplate in all our files? With this and
vim-modeline, we now have editor boilerplate that takes as much space as
the MPL boilerplate. Also, afaik, vim modelines are mostly useless, since
vim doesn't use them
On 1/7/14, 5:42 PM, Martin Thomson wrote:
Yeah, I thought that was the whole point of having a .emacs file. I’ve never
found those mode line things to be properly useful short of the point that it
includes the entire c-offsets-alist for the buffer. I’d rather the mode line
stuff be removed.
Chris Peterson writes:
If mozilla-central is reformatted, that would be a good time to
also remove the modelines.
5. Remove modelines from mozilla-central files
I'm happy with removal of modelines provided .dir-locals.el files
are added to provide the same functionality.
There is imported
I'd like to see the removal of the modelines also. A root config file is
much cleaner.
For the widest possible support of editors, I'd love to see a root
.editorconfig file. See http://editorconfig.org/ - it's an
editor-neutral config, with plugins for many editors/IDEs (including
Emacs,
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:08 PM, Scott Johnson sjohn...@mozilla.com wrote:
I'd recommend we not do this, as it will likely break hg blame.
I think the idea that white space-only changes break hg blame needs
to die :) White space-only changes are a change like any other, and at
worst add one step
(2013/09/14 13:37), Reuben Morais wrote:
On Sep 11, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Scott Johnson sjohn...@mozilla.com wrote:
I understand the merit of leaving the code as is since hg blame won't work
nicely with such file-wide format change as in step-1.
(Or maybe we can teach hg blame to ignore such
On Sep 11, 2013, at 12:04 PM, Scott Johnson sjohn...@mozilla.com wrote:
I understand the merit of leaving the code as is since hg blame won't work
nicely with such file-wide format change as in step-1.
(Or maybe we can teach hg blame to ignore such change, etc. but maybe too
much work: the
Thus Spoke ishikawa:
On (2013年09月10日 00:08), Scott Johnson wrote:
Thus Spoke ishikawa:
So you are suggesting something like
step 1 - request for formatting a file indented in an arcane format, i.e.,
reformat it according to the currently adopted code.
Exactly what I meant, if by request for
On (2013年09月10日 00:08), Scott Johnson wrote:
Thus Spoke ishikawa:
I wonder if trying to re-indent legacy code according to the current style
is a good idea or not. (It is a little irritating to modify a part of legacy
code and find my editor trying to follow the current style while the rest
On (2013年09月10日 01:42), Chris Peterson wrote:
On 9/9/13 6:58 AM, Dao wrote:
Probably historic reasons (e.g. somebody started adding lots of Java
files with 4-space indents and changing those wasn't considered
worthwhile) or consistency with
On 2013-09-10 12:09 PM, ishikawa wrote:
On (2013年09月10日 00:08), Scott Johnson wrote:
Thus Spoke ishikawa:
I wonder if trying to re-indent legacy code according to the current style
is a good idea or not. (It is a little irritating to modify a part of legacy
code and find my editor trying to
On 9/10/13 3:09 AM, ishikawa wrote:
OTOH, code in a strange indentation is hard to touch: during linux
development around 2.1.1xx, Alan Cox got tired of the spaghetti code of SCSI
driver subsystem and introduced a revision: that revision consisted only of
sweeping reformatting of scsi
On 09.09.2013 05:15, ishikawa wrote:
I have been recently editing javascript files to
reduce warnings but found an issue of adopted styls in comm-central
thunderbird codes.
I checked for the preferred style:
[1] I found one reference here:
(2013/09/09 21:18), Dao wrote:
On 09.09.2013 05:15, ishikawa wrote:
I have been recently editing javascript files to
reduce warnings but found an issue of adopted styls in comm-central
thunderbird codes.
I checked for the preferred style:
[1] I found one reference here:
On 09.09.2013 14:48, ISHIKAWA,chiaki wrote:
But to be honest, I wonder why 2 for JS and 4 for Java.
As far as the indentation requirement is concerned, there does
not seem to be much difference between the two languages.
But there must be a reason. But for a casual programmer, it is not clear.
Thus Spoke ishikawa:
I wonder if trying to re-indent legacy code according to the current style
is a good idea or not. (It is a little irritating to modify a part of legacy
code and find my editor trying to follow the current style while the rest of
the file is in different style.)
I'd
On 9/9/13 6:58 AM, Dao wrote:
Probably historic reasons (e.g. somebody started adding lots of Java
files with 4-space indents and changing those wasn't considered
worthwhile) or consistency with
http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/java/javase/documentation/codeconventions-136091.html?
Google's
I have been recently editing javascript files to
reduce warnings but found an issue of adopted styls in comm-central
thunderbird codes.
I checked for the preferred style:
[1] I found one reference here:
http://autonome.wordpress.com/2006/03/24/javascript-style-guide-for-mozilla-projects/
[2] I
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ishikawa ishik...@yk.rim.or.jp wrote:
So my question boils down to
- what is the preferred style for JavaScript now for mozilla source code?
There isn't one that applies across all of Mozilla, and I think that's
not a problem.
ishikawa ishik...@yk.rim.or.jp writes:
- Has anyone have mode-line (or .emacs) setting to make the indentation in
Emacs to follow the prefered style?
I've got by so-far with M-x set-variable js-indent-level 2 when
necessary, but this doesn't automatically become buffer-local, so
I find myself
On (2013年09月09日 12:45), Karl Tomlinson wrote:
ishikawa ishik...@yk.rim.or.jp writes:
- Has anyone have mode-line (or .emacs) setting to make the indentation in
Emacs to follow the prefered style?
I've got by so-far with M-x set-variable js-indent-level 2 when
necessary, but this doesn't
On (2013年09月09日 12:44), Gavin Sharp wrote:
On Mon, Sep 9, 2013 at 10:15 AM, ishikawa ishik...@yk.rim.or.jp wrote:
So my question boils down to
- what is the preferred style for JavaScript now for mozilla source code?
There isn't one that applies across all of Mozilla, and I think that's
30 matches
Mail list logo
