This is now done, as of https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1282866
the Qt code has been removed from mozilla-central.
--BDS
On Fri, Jun 24, 2016 at 11:57 AM, Douglas Turner wrote:
> I am a peer. Feel free to file a bug against me to remove this port. It
> served
I am a peer. Feel free to file a bug against me to remove this port. It
served it's purpose. Anyone that wants to keep it alive can do it outside
of m-c (long live dvcs).
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 12:35 PM Benjamin Smedberg
wrote:
> I'm going to resurrect this old thread
I'm going to resurrect this old thread to ask: is anybody currently
triaging bugs the Core: Widget: Qt bugzilla component? I'm trying to find
owners for all of our active bugzilla components, and I'm not sure the
status of this.
I would support us removing the widget/qt code from the tree unless
Hi,
for quite some time I'm not really working with Qt anymore. So from my
very own perspective I have to say I cannot care about it anymore
realistically. So if other people are caring and want to become peers it
would even be better for everyone to remove myself from the module.
Wolfgang
Am
I don't know if Oleg (Romaxa) is still interested in this work. He was
doing work for Nokia's MeGo platform when the code was added. MeGo was shut
down by Nokia. Sailfish OS is the continuation but I don't know of any
attempt to get Firefox running on Sailfish. Wolfgang is a long time
Mozilla/SUSE
Where is this work taking place? Would it be possible for you to work
directly in mozilla-central?
Looking at the hg history of the the widget/qt subdirectory, all the
changes I see there are Masayuki updating it for changes elsewhere, and
people making tree-wide changes that have nothing to do
I think that in this context we are talking about mozilla/widget/qt/*
components and yes we're using those in our Gecko build. We don't use
QWidgets for Sailfish Browser. User interface of the Sailfish Browser is
written with Qt QML.
There is more info in the embedding wiki [1] and Dmitry's blog
Added Raine Mäkeläinen, who has been committing to qtmozembed lately, to CC.
On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 1:51 AM, Jim Blandy wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 2:45 PM, Masayuki Nakano
wrote:
>
>
> So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central?
What the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central?
The same question can be asked of widget/uikit/, which I believe is for the
old,
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Henri Sivonen wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano
> wrote:
> > So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central?
> What
> > the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central?
>
>
On 2016/04/12 20:27, Henri Sivonen wrote:
On Tue, Apr 12, 2016 at 7:45 AM, Masayuki Nakano wrote:
So, my question is, why do we still have Qt widget in mozilla-central? What
the reason of keeping it in mozilla-central?
My understanding is that
Hello.
mozilla-central has dropped a lot of platform supports after Gecko 1.9,
especially OS/2 which was contributed by some volunteers. However,
there is still Qt widget. Looks like that nobody isn't working on Qt
widget but when I reorganizing some code, like WidgetEvent related code,
I
12 matches
Mail list logo