Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 1:04 AM, L. David Baron wrote: > The W3C is proposing a charter for: > > JSON-LD Working Group > https://www.w3.org/2018/03/jsonld-wg-charter.html > https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2018Mar/0004.html > > Mozilla has the

Re: PSA: new helper class for MozPromise in DOM code

Hi > On 26 Apr 2018, at 10:12 pm, Ben Kelly wrote: > > Hi all, > > I pushed a new helper class to inbound today to make it easier to work with > MozPromise in DOM code. Specifically, it allows you to auto-disconnect a > Thenable request when the global dies. > > The class

Re: PSA: new helper class for MozPromise in DOM code

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018, 3:13 AM Jean-Yves Avenard wrote: > > The class is called DOMMozPromiseRequestHolder. Here is an example using > > it: > > is that just a refcounted version of MozPromiseRequestHolder? > No. It binds to the global and calls DisconnectIfExists() when

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

On Friday 2018-04-27 10:07 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: > For this reason, I think we should resist introducing dependencies on > JSON-LD in formats and APIs that are relevant to the Web Platform. I > think it follows that we should not support this charter. I expect > this charter to pass in any

Is anyone using data from ChromeHangs?

In bug 1448040 I'm looking at consolidating / cleaning up / removing hang monitoring threads, and the question came up whether we could just get rid of the thread that reports chromeHangs[1]. I didn't want to step on anyone's toes though, so if you use this or know someone who does then please let

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

On Friday 2018-04-27 16:09 -0500, Adam Roach wrote: > If there's a set of behaviors defined by the 1.0 spec, and a different set > of behaviors implemented, deployed, and evangelized, I think it would be > reasonable to object (on that basis) to a charter that does not explicitly > include work

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

On 4/27/18 2:02 PM, L. David Baron wrote: On Friday 2018-04-27 10:07 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: For this reason, I think we should resist introducing dependencies on JSON-LD in formats and APIs that are relevant to the Web Platform. I think it follows that we should not support this charter. I

Re: Proposed W3C Charter: JSON-LD Working Group

On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 2:09 PM, Adam Roach wrote: > On 4/27/18 2:02 PM, L. David Baron wrote: >> >> On Friday 2018-04-27 10:07 +0300, Henri Sivonen wrote: >>> >>> For this reason, I think we should resist introducing dependencies on >>> JSON-LD in formats and APIs that are