On 22/03/2014 07:30 , L. David Baron wrote:
I'm inclined to think that it's not worth putting up a massive fight
over the group's organization here, which I think is what it would
take to change this plan. I think I'd rather focus the bandwidth of
our communication with W3C management on other
On Monday 2014-03-17 13:31 -0400, Richard Eyre wrote:
Thanks for adding me Anne, you did get my email correct :-).
Personally, I'm not interested in developing TTML. I still agree to all the
points from our previous discussion from the page you linked, Anne.
I'm not really sure whether
On Tue, Feb 25, 2014 at 7:56 AM, L. David Baron dba...@dbaron.org wrote:
The W3C is proposing a revised charter for:
Timed Text Working Group
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-new-work/2014Feb/0004.html
http://www.w3.org/2013/10/timed-text-charter.html
deadline for comments:
Thanks for adding me Anne, you did get my email correct :-).
Personally, I'm not interested in developing TTML. I still agree to all the
points from our previous discussion from the page you linked, Anne.
I'm not really sure whether having a joint working group would be of
benefit, particularly
4 matches
Mail list logo
