On Sat, August 9, 2014 4:53 pm, David E. Ross wrote:
Anyone wishing to argue this issue further -- to argue in favor of
implementing a scheme to encourage all Web sites to be HTTPS with site
certificates -- should first read
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 04:53:46PM -0700, David E. Ross wrote:
Anyone wishing to argue this issue further -- to argue in favor of
implementing a scheme to encourage all Web sites to be HTTPS with site
certificates -- should first read
On 10/08/14 11:16 PM, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/10/2014 4:09 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 04:53:46PM -0700, David E. Ross wrote:
Anyone wishing to argue this issue further -- to argue in favor of
implementing a scheme to encourage all Web sites to be HTTPS with site
On Sun, August 10, 2014 4:06 pm, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 11:52:16PM -0700, Ryan Sleevi wrote:
At the risk of engaging what may be trolling behaviour (non-attributable
email addresses and all that good jazz), and while a point-by-point
takedown is not particularly worthy,
On Sun, August 10, 2014 8:16 pm, David E. Ross wrote:
I was a computer systems integrator for over 30 years. I fully
understand what integrator means. In my career, sopftware integration
often included dealing with secure systems and how they were made secure.
That's a very... liberal...
On Sun, Aug 10, 2014 at 08:16:42PM -0700, David E. Ross wrote:
On 8/10/2014 4:09 PM, Matt Palmer wrote:
On Sat, Aug 09, 2014 at 04:53:46PM -0700, David E. Ross wrote:
Anyone wishing to argue this issue further -- to argue in favor of
implementing a scheme to encourage all Web sites to be
6 matches
Mail list logo
