--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19385.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If a tsever ingests slowly, will it affect other tservers ingest rate?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19385.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
hujs wrote:
Hello, I asked a few questions,
1, suppose I insert data into the 'a' table, each tserver in the cluster has
at least one 'a' table of tablets, I use letters such as j, k as the split
point. If I have four tserver A, B, C, D, A, B, C ingest rate can reach 90k,
D ingest rate only
, rowid = 5 will be written to n% 3 = 2 Tablet. What can I
do?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19368.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
7 0.40
So,What should I do？
thank you very much！
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19330.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
000.003.00 0.67 0.40
So,What should I do？
thank you very much！
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19330.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
uggestions, right?
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19324.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19324.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
rsey.*.jar,
Classpaths that accumulo checks for updates and class
files.
Think you dear josh Elser;
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19319.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
lass
files.
Think you dear josh Elser;
--
View this message in context:
http://apache-accumulo.1065345.n5.nabble.com/Write-or-Ingest-bottleneck-tp19255p19319.html
Sent from the Developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Without seeing your images:
Make sure that your split points actually divide up your data.
For example, if you only write data where the rowId starts with the
letters a-z but your split the table on numbers 0-9, only one tablet
will receive the data.
The entries in a table is an
Apache mailing lists regularly strip attachments. Can you please host
the images elsewhere and provide links to them?
hjs19890 wrote:
Hello everyone,
I have some problems need help. see Figure 1, I have hjs_v table pre
split multiple tablets, but I insert a large amount of data into the
Hello everyone,
I have some problems need help. see Figure 1, I have hjs_v table pre
split multiple tablets, but I insert a large amount of data into the cluster
only one intake of data, the other two free, I have done many times Like this
operation, are the same result.
See
Hi,
What do you mean by "accumulo's ingest rate affects accumulo's insertion
performance"? Ingest *is* insertion into the database. Please describe
what you mean by "insertion performance". Are you comparing some custom
code you have written to the Continuous Ingest client?
60K entries/sec
hi,
I'm testing the accumulo insertion performance and found that accumulo's
ingest rate affects accumulo's insertion performance. In the access to relevant
information when I found the accumulo itself comes with the test suite.
Therefore, I ran accumulo-1.7.1 / test / system / continuous
15 matches
Mail list logo
