On 30 Aug 2018, at 05:30, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
> Second;
> Are we comfortable adding a dependency on autoconf-archive?
> This macro below dates back to 2010. If we are not, I can
> revert this. In any case, I think it would be unwise to introduce
> this before 1.7, we generally haven't change
> Pull request #5 https://github.com/apache/apr/pull/5/files
> corresponds to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61985
> Yann and I are neutral on dodging (fd == -1), what do others think?
> This would be a trivial one-line fix if we adopt it.
>
> Are there any committers with an op
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> First;
> Pull request #5 https://github.com/apache/apr/pull/5/files
> corresponds to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61985
> Yann and I are neutral on dodging (fd == -1), what do others think?
> This would be a trivial on
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:40 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Second;
>> Are we comfortable adding a dependency on autoconf-archive?
>> This macro below dates back to 2010. If we are not, I can
>> revert this.
>>
>
> And note I'
On Wed, Aug 29, 2018 at 10:30 PM, William A Rowe Jr
wrote:
>
> Second;
> Are we comfortable adding a dependency on autoconf-archive?
> This macro below dates back to 2010. If we are not, I can
> revert this.
>
And note I'll need to tweak the buildcheck.sh if we choose to keep
the dependency, it
First;
Pull request #5 https://github.com/apache/apr/pull/5/files
corresponds to https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61985
Yann and I are neutral on dodging (fd == -1), what do others think?
This would be a trivial one-line fix if we adopt it.
Second;
Are we comfortable adding a depende
