Hi All,
I recently became aware of CVE issue
https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-6mjq-h674-j845 with the Java netty
libraries and using the fixed Netty library in version 4.1.94.Final
required a patch for Arrow, already merged in
https://github.com/apache/arrow/issues/36209.
I know the freeze for
Congrats Ben!
On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 12:05 PM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Congratulations Ben :-)
>
>
> Le 06/05/2021 à 21:02, Rok Mihevc a écrit :
> > Congrats!
> >
> > On Thu, May 6, 2021 at 10:49 AM Krisztián Szűcs <
> szucs.kriszt...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Congrats Ben!
> >>
> >> On Th
Congratulations!!
On Sun, Jun 6, 2021, 7:28 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that
> Kazuaki Ishizaki has accepted an invitation to become a
> committer on Apache Arrow. Welcome, and thank you for your
> contributions!
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
Congrats David!
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021, 7:24 PM Micah Kornfield wrote:
> Congrats David!
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 7:13 PM Fan Liya wrote:
>
> > Congratulations David!
> >
> > Best,
> > Liya Fan
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021 at 9:44 AM Yibo Cai wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats David!
> > >
> > > O
C first choice, E second
On Mon, Jun 28, 2021, 8:40 AM Julian Hyde wrote:
> D
>
> (2nd choice E if we’re doing ranked-choice voting)
>
> Julian
>
> > On Jun 24, 2021, at 12:24 PM, Weston Pace wrote:
> >
> > The discussion in [1] led to the following question. Before we
> > proceed on a vote i
+1 non-binding
On Wed, Jun 30, 2021, 2:53 AM Weston Pace wrote:
> This vote is a result of previous discussion[1][2]. This vote is also
> a prerequisite for the PR in [5].
>
> ---
> Some date & time libraries have three temporal concepts. For the sake
> of this document we will call them Local
Congratulations Kou, thanks for all your work!
On Thu, Jan 27, 2022, 4:36 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Thanks everyone!!!
>
> In
> "[ANNOUNCE] New Arrow PMC chair: Kouhei Sutou" on Tue, 25 Jan 2022
> 11:32:56 -0500,
> Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > I am pleased to announce that we have a new PMC ch
Hi All,
Congrats on the 7.0.0 release! I was trying it out and got an error not
being able to find arrow-flight-7.0.0.pom. This looks like a new parent POM
for Flight, so I checked maven central and don't see it deployed there. Not
sure what could have happened, but maybe it's only me. Anyone else
ven.org/maven2/org/apache/arrow/flight-grpc/
>
> Can we use flight-core (and flight-grpc) instead of
> arrow-flight?
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In
> "Is 7.0.0 release missing the Java arrow-flight POM?" on Thu, 17 Feb
> 2022 09:48:57 -0800,
> Bry
w why our upload script
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/blob/master/dev/release/06-java-upload.sh
> doesn't upload it...
>
> Could you take a look at it?
>
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In
> "Re: Is 7.0.0 release missing the Java arrow-flight POM?"
, Feb 17, 2022 at 10:06 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> Sure, I'll take a look at the script.
>
> On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 4:39 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Ah, arrow-flight-*.pom exists on our CI artifacts:
>>
>> https://github.com/ursacomputing/cr
les at
> > https://repository.apache.org/#stagingRepositories with your
> > ASF account.
> > Note that you MUST not press the "Close" button! I'll remove
> > them by pressing "Drop" button when we fix this.
> >
> >
> > Th
I think this would be a useful feature and be nice to have in Flight core.
For cases like previewing data, you usually just want to get a small amount
of data quickly. Would it make sense to make this part of DoGet since it
still would be returning a record batch? Perhaps a Ticket could be made to
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Mar 14, 2022 at 10:26 AM David Li wrote:
> My vote: +1 (binding)
>
> Are any other PMC members able to take a quick look?
>
> Thanks,
> David
>
> On Sat, Mar 12, 2022, at 07:31, Kun Liu wrote:
> > +1 non-binding
> > just uploaded the missing pom and don't need to releas
Congrats to all!
On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 12:11 AM Alenka Frim wrote:
> Congratulations all!
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2022 at 1:55 AM Yang hao <1371656737...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations to all!
> >
> > From: Benson Muite
> > Date: Thursday, March 10, 2022 at 03:45
> > To: dev@arrow.apache
+1 (non-binding)
On Mon, Mar 28, 2022, 7:07 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> Thank you David for pushing this through -- I think the overall FlightSQL
> story is very compelling for the Arrow ecosystem
>
> I am also +1 on the idea, but I haven't had enough time to study the
> implementation in detail yet
Thanks for bringing this up Micah. Given that we have finite resources for
CI, I think the oldest active LTS version sounds pretty reasonable.
Ultimately it should be community driven and balance between the available
resources we have and peoples time to patch any issues that come up.
On Tue, Mar
Congratulations!! That's great news and really glad to have you on the
project!
On Wed, Apr 27, 2022, 11:44 AM Andrew Lamb wrote:
> On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Liang-Chi Hsieh
> has accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apache
> Arrow. Welcome, and thank you
+1 (non-binding)
I ran:
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1
ARROW_GANDIVA=OFF ARROW_PLASMA=OFF dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh
8.0.0 3
On Wed, May 4, 2022 at 3:23 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> +1
>
> I ran the followings on Debian GNU/Linux sid:
>
> * TEST_DEFAULT
I had the same problem and Antoine's suggestion was exactly what was wrong.
On Mon, Apr 13, 2020 at 1:27 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Le 13/04/2020 à 02:42, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> > When I follow the instructions at
> > https://arrow.apache.org/docs/developers/benchmarks.html
> >
> > "pip i
I really would like to see a 1.0.0 release with complete implementations
for C++ and Java. From my experience, that interoperability has been a
major selling point for the project. That being said, my time for
contributions has been pretty limited lately and I know that Java has been
lagging, so if
I've been trying out IO with Arrow's extension types and I was able write a
parquet file but reading it back causes an error:
"pyarrow.lib.ArrowInvalid: Unsupported nested type: ...". Looking at the
code for the parquet reader, it checks nested types and only allows a few
specific ones. Is this a k
ed out but
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-1644 (and related subtasks)
> > might be a good place to track this.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Micah
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:13 AM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >
> > >
+1 (non-binding)
I ran:
ARROW_TMPDIR=/tmp/arrow-test TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_CPP=1
TEST_PYTHON=1 TEST_JAVA=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 0.17.1 1
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 8:38 AM Francois Saint-Jacques <
fsaintjacq...@gmai
Congratulations!
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 9:29 PM Fan Liya wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I want to thank you all for all your kind help.
> It is a great honor to work with you in this great community.
> I Hope we can contribute more and make the community better.
>
> Best,
> Liya Fan
>
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2
+1
On Wed, Jun 24, 2020, 10:38 AM Francois Saint-Jacques <
fsaintjacq...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
+0 (non-binding)
I ran verification script for binaries and then source, as below, and both
look good
ARROW_TMPDIR=/tmp/arrow-test TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_CPP=1
TEST_PYTHON=1 TEST_JAVA=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 1.0.0 1
> > > time zone) and Arrow (which has naive timestamps -- a
> > concept
> > > > similar
> > > > > > > > > > but different from the SQL concept TIMESTAMP WITHOUT TIME
> > ZONE
> > > > -- and
> > > > > > &g
+1 (non-binding)
I ran release verification script with the following args
ARROW_TMPDIR=/tmp/arrow-test TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_CPP=1
TEST_PYTHON=1 TEST_JAVA=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 1.0.0 2
On Wed, Jul 22, 2020 at 1
Hi all,
I came across a behavior change from 0.17.1 when comparing array scalar
values with python objects. This used to work for 0.17.1 and before, but in
1.0.0 equals always returns false. I saw there was a previous discussion on
Python equality semantics, but not sure if the conclusion is the b
l(a[0], 1)
> ...
> TypeError: Got unexpected argument type for compute function
>
> For this last one, we should probably do an attempt to convert the python
> scalar to a pyarrow scalar, and maybe for the "a[0] == 1" case as well
> (however, coerce to which type if th
I also think this would be a worthwhile addition and help the project
expand in more areas. Beyond the Apache Spark optimization use case, having
Arrow interoperability with the Python data science stack on BE would be
very useful. I have looked at the remaining PRs for Java and they seem
pretty mi
There isn't a direct conversion to/from Spark, I made
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-29040 a while ago for
conversion to Spark from an Arrow table. If possible, make a comment there
for your use case which might help get support for it.
Bryan
On Mon, Aug 31, 2020, 9:12 PM Micah Kornf
+1 (non-binding)
I verified binaries and source with:
ARROW_TMPDIR=/tmp/arrow-test ARROW_GANDIVA=0 ARROW_PLASMA=0 TEST_DEFAULT=0
TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_CPP=1 TEST_PYTHON=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 2.0.0 2
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 2:02 PM Sutou Kouhei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I forgot t
Congrats Wes, well deserved!
On Sun, Oct 25, 2020, 10:17 PM Jorge Cardoso Leitão <
jorgecarlei...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks a lot Jacques for taking the flag until now, and congratulations,
> Wes!
>
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 2:58 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
>
> > Thanks all!
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 25,
There seems to be a Github check error with the Java JNI tests for the ORC
adapter that is affecting a lot of recent PRs, see
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/8577/checks?check_run_id=1346780145.
>From the log, it looks like some env setting, but I can't tell what's
wrong. Anyone else know?
Th
Hi Nick,
I left a note in the PR that I will try to review soon, thanks!
On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 8:22 PM Nick Bruno wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I'd like to get feedback on the pull request I created a little over a
> week ago - https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/9151
>
> It adds support for Map type
+1 (non-binding)
I verified binaries and source with the following:
ARROW_TMPDIR=/tmp/arrow-test ARROW_GANDIVA=0 ARROW_PLASMA=0 TEST_DEFAULT=0
TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_CPP=1 TEST_PYTHON=1 TEST_JAVA=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1
TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1 dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source
3.0.0 2
I
+1 sgtm
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021, 9:47 AM Micah Kornfield wrote:
> +1, but let's keep an eye on it to make sure it remains stable.
>
> On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 5:34 AM Kazuaki Ishizaki
> wrote:
>
> > Thank you. +1 for this proposal,
> >
> > Kazuaki Ishizaki
> >
> >
> >
> > From: Benjamin Kietzman
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:59 AM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> I really like the separate versions
>
> Uwe
>
> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019, at 2:21 PM, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
> >
> > +1 from me.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 26 Jul 2019 14:33:30 -0500
>
Sounds good to me, I would just echo what others have said.
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 8:17 AM Ryan Murray wrote:
> Thanks Wes,
>
> The descriptor is only there to maintain a bit of symmetry with
> GetFlightInfo. Happy to remove it, I don't think its necessary and already
> a few people agree. Simil
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Aug 16, 2019, 8:36 AM Micah Kornfield wrote:
> My vote +1 (binding)
>
> On Friday, August 16, 2019, David Li wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks Ryan for working on this!
> >
> > Best,
> > David
> >
> > On 8/16/19, Micah Kornfield wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > > Rya
+1 (non-binding)
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019, 7:43 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Sorry, had forgotten to send my vote on this.
>
> +1 from me.
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> On Wed, 14 Aug 2019 17:42:33 -0500
> Wes McKinney wrote:
> > hi all,
> >
> > As we've been discussing [1], there is a need to int
Congrats David!
On Fri, Aug 30, 2019 at 10:19 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> Congratulations David and welcome to the team :-)
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
> Le 30/08/2019 à 18:21, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC I'm happy to announce that David has
> > accepted an invitatio
Congrats Ben, Kenta and Neal!
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019, 12:15 PM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
> Congratulations!
>
> On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 8:12 PM Ben Kietzman
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks!
> >
> > On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 1:09 PM Micah Kornfield
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Congrats everyone! (apologies if I double sen
(today maybe). I think we should create a branch
> > > > > > where we can stack the patches that implement this for each
> > language.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 4:04 AM Paul Taylor
> > > > > >
> > > >
I have the patch for the EOS with Java writers up here
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5345. Just to clarify, the EOS of
{0x, 0x} is used for both stream and file formats, in
non-legacy writing mode.
On Mon, Sep 9, 2019 at 8:01 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> Sounds good to
I'm able to pass Spark integration tests locally with the build patch from
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/5465, so I'm reasonably confident all
the issues have been resolved and it's just flaky timeouts now. We are
trying some things to fix the timeouts, but nothing to hold up the release
for
prefix/src/orc_ep-stamp/orc_ep-build] Error 1
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1248: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/orc_ep.dir/all'
failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/orc_ep.dir/all] Error 2
On Wed, Oct 2, 2019 at 4:12 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> I ran the following on Ubunt
+1 (non-binding)
I ran the following on Ubuntu 16.04 4.15.0-64-generic:
> dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh binaries 0.15.0 2
> ARROW_CUDA=OFF \
TEST_DEFAULT=0 \
TEST_SOURCE=1 \
TEST_CPP=1 \
TEST_PYTHON=1 \
TEST_JAVA=1 \
TEST_INTEGRATION=1 \
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 0.1
Sounds good, thanks Krisztian!
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 6:10 AM Krisztián Szűcs
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've created a docker hub organisation called "arrowdev"
> to host the images defined in the docker-compose.yml, see
> the following commit [1].
> So now it is possible to speed up the image builds by
A lot of good info here, I added a point that has come up often for me.
On Thu, Oct 3, 2019 at 10:03 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> I read through and left some comments.
>
> Would be great to turn into an FAQ section in the docs and add a link
> to the navigation on the front page of the website.
>
>
Great work everyone!
On Sun, Oct 6, 2019 at 1:46 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Congrats everyone!
>
> On Sat, Oct 5, 2019 at 10:09 AM Krisztián Szűcs wrote:
> >
> > The Apache Arrow community is pleased to announce the 0.15.0 release.
> > The release includes 711 resolved issues ([1]) since the 0.14
Congrats!
On Thu, Oct 17, 2019, 6:26 PM Fan Liya wrote:
> Congrats Eric!
>
> Best,
> Liya Fan
>
> On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 3:06 AM paddy horan
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Eric!
> >
> >
> > From: Micah Kornfield
> > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2019 12:45:15 PM
> > To
Just to clarify, how will this be different than the current vector writers
that they are wrapping? Is it just the ability to add multiple values at
once, or more efficiently?
Also, if we are going to be adding new APIs, maybe we can try to match more
closely the existing builders in C++? I believ
+1 (non-binding), although I could not complete the source verification
script
On Ubuntu 16.04 I ran
* verification script for binaries, no issues
* verification script for source, could not complete:
TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_PYTHON=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1
TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1 ARROW
2019 at 2:17 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> hi Bryan -- I think `pip3 install setuptools` will take care of it
>
> On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:06 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >
> > +1 (non-binding), although I could not complete the source verification
> > script
> >
> >
mmands.
--help Show this message and exit.
Commands:
benchmark Arrow benchmarking.
build Initialize an Arrow C++ build
On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 2:38 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> I am using a conda env, so that will install the package there. When
> archery runs the integration
I think having a chunked array with multiple vector buffers would be ideal,
similar to C++. It might take a fair amount of work to add this but would
open up a lot more functionality. As for the API,
VectorSchemaRoot.concat(Collection) seems good to me.
On Thu, Nov 7, 2019 at 12:09 AM Fan Liya wr
this but
>> would open up a lot more functionality.
>
>
> There are potentially two different use-cases. ChunkedArray is
> logical/lazy concatenation where as concat, physically rebuilds the vectors
> to be a single vector.
>
> On Fri, Nov 8, 2019 at 10:51 AM Bryan Cutler
After ARROW-3191 [1], consumers of Arrow Java with a JDK 9 and above are
required to set the JVM property "io.netty.tryReflectionSetAccessible=true"
at startup, each time Arrow code is run, as documented at [2]. Not doing
this will result in the error "java.lang.UnsupportedOperationException:
sun.m
t; > I've had in the past.
> >
> > Do we need to handle jdk8 as a special case? Do you think it pays to try
> > to find an alternate library that doesn't require special flags for
> > whatever we are using this functionality for?
> >
> > Thanks,
>
I agree on a 0.16.0 release. In the meantime I'll try to help out with
getting the Java side ready for 1.0.
On Sat, Jan 4, 2020 at 7:21 PM Fan Liya wrote:
> Hi Jacques,
>
> ARROW-4526 is interesting. I would like to try to resolve it.
> Thanks a lot for the information.
>
> Best,
> Liya Fan
>
>
Thanks for investigating this and the quick fix Joris and Wes! I just have
a couple questions about the behavior observed here. The pyspark code
assigns either the same series back to the pandas.DataFrame or makes some
modifications if it is a timestamp. In the case there are no timestamps, is
th
itted
> blocks will get combined (resulting in a memory copy then), and it also
> means you can't modify the dataframe (if this dataframe is used in python
> UDFs, it might limit what can be done in those UDFs. Just guessing here, I
> don't know the pyspark code well enough).
&
Hi Micah, I don't have a ton of bandwidth at the moment, but I'll try to
review some more PRs. Anyone, please feel free to ping me too if you have a
stale PR that needs some help getting through. Outreach to other Java
communities sounds like a good idea - more Java users would definitely be a
good
I saw on Confluence that other Arrow components have PR dashboards, but I
don't see one for Java? I think it would be helpful, is it difficult to add
one for Java? I'm happy to do it if someone could point me in the right
direction. Thanks!
Bryan
Return a null might be more correct since `getObject(int index)` also
return a null value if not set, but I don't think it's worth making a more
complicated API for this. It should be fine to return `false` for a null
value.
+1 for treating nulls as empty.
On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 9:12 AM Brian Hul
t; open.
>
> Or you could bookmark
>
> https://github.com/apache/arrow/pulls?utf8=%E2%9C%93&q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+%22%5BJava%5D%22
> or https://github.com/apache/arrow/labels/lang-java
>
> Neal
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 11:26 AM Bryan Cutler wrote:
>
> > I saw on
-1
There is a bug in Pandas conversion for timestamps that looks to be a
regression, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7709
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 11:30 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> I opened https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7708.
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 1:24 PM Wes McKinney
:
> Bryan -- was this tested somewhere that we missed (eg a nightly)?
>
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2020, 4:31 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
>
> > -1
> > There is a bug in Pandas conversion for timestamps that looks to be a
> > regression, https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7709
&
Actually, it looks like they weren't passing after the `split_blocks`
change either. From a quick glance, the Spark tests were passing up to 1/14
and they started failing after that.
On Tue, Jan 28, 2020 at 3:17 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> The nightly Spark integration was failing becaus
An update on Spark integration tests: the new error looks to be a
regression so I made https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARROW-7723 and
marked as a blocker. It's possible to work around this bug, so I wouldn't
call it a hard blocker if we need to proceed with the release.
On Wed, Jan 29, 2020
Hi Andy,
What is your JDK version? I haven't seen that exact error, did you open
Arrow as a Maven project in Intellij?
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:47 AM Andy Grove wrote:
> I'm working on the Java codebase and cannot run code inside IntelliJ and it
> looks like some kind of compatibility issue betw
line with Maven works fine.
> >
> > Very odd. I'll guess I'll do a little more research on errorprone.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Andy.
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:50 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Andy,
> >&g
ne Compiler" plugin to intellij
> >> 2. setting "Settings/Build, Execution, Deployment/Compiler/Java
> >> Compiler/Use compiler" to "Javac with error-prone"
> >>
> >> I am using Intellij 2019.3 (Community Edition)
> >>
> >> Best,
+1
I had some trouble due to ARROW-7760 at first, but applied the same patch
and passed. I ran the command:
TMPDIR=/tmp/arrow TEST_DEFAULT=0 TEST_SOURCE=1 TEST_CPP=1 TEST_PYTHON=1
TEST_JAVA=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_CPP=1 TEST_INTEGRATION_JAVA=1
dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 0.16.0 2
On
at 2:23 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Bryan -- I just gave you (cutlerb) Confluence edit privileges. These
> have to be explicitly managed on a per-user basis to avoid spam
> problems
>
> On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:12 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >
> > Thanks Neal, but it does
Works now, thanks! I added a page for Java open PRs
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/ARROW/Java+Open+Patches
On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 12:08 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Weird. Try now
>
> On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 1:03 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >
> > Wes, it doesn&
While looking into Null type testing for ARROW-7899, a couple small issues
came up regarding Flight integration testing with empty batches (row count
== 0) that could be worked out with a quick discussion. It seems there is a
small difference between the C++ and Java Flight servers when there are
e
that are empty,
> > because Flight lets you attach metadata to batches, and so an empty
> > batch might still have metadata that the client or server wants.
> >
> > Best,
> > David
> >
> > On 2/24/20, Bryan Cutler wrote:
> > > While looking into Nu
+1 for using black
On Fri, Mar 27, 2020 at 11:53 AM Joris Van den Bossche <
jorisvandenboss...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Mar 2020 at 18:49, Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> > I don't want to be the small minority opposing this so let's go for it.
> > One question though: will we continue to ch
+1 (non-binding)
I ran tests for C++, Python, Java, integration. I also tried to run
spark-integration, but failed with the linking error below - not a blocker
though
/usr/bin/ld.gold: error:
/opt/conda/envs/pyarrow-dev/lib/libgtest.a(gtest-all.cc.o): requires
dynamic R_X86_64_32 reloc against '_
Congrats to all and welcome!
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 2:00 PM Li Jin Welcome!
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:01 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
>
> > Welcome to all of you!
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, at 8:56 PM, Wes McKinney wrote:
> > > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Romain
> > > Fran
Congrats Krisztián!
On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, 2:00 PM Li Jin Congrats!
>
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 4:02 PM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
>
> > Congratulations Krisztián!
> >
> > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018, at 9:56 PM, Philipp Moritz wrote:
> > > Congrats and welcome Krisztián!
> > >
> > > On Thu, Nov 8, 2018 at 11:48 A
Hi all,
I'm picking this back up again and have WIP pr at
https://github.com/apache/arrow/pull/2966. Please take a look at the new
APIs and see if they impact you downstream. In addition to the API changes
mentioned before by Li, there is also
(4) IntervalDayVector now uses java.time.Duration, w
Hi All,
I have a question about using pyarrow.Array.from_pandas with the safe flag
set to True. When the Pandas data contains integers and NULL values, it
will get changed to a floating point dtype and then if the type is casted
back to an integer in Arrow, it will raise an error "ArrowInvalid: F
+1
I ran ARROW_HAVE_CUDA=NO dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source
0.12.0 4
- 4.15.0-43-generic #46~16.04.1-Ubuntu
- openjdk version "1.8.0_191"
- gcc version 5.4.0
I also ran Spark integration tests and was able to get all tests passing
after some minor modifications.
Bryan
O
Congratulations Ravindra!
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019, 7:40 PM Praveen Kumar Congrats again Ravindra :)
>
> On Tue, Feb 5, 2019 at 12:32 AM Robert Nishihara <
> robertnishih...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Congratulations!
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:06 AM Antoine Pitrou
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Cong
Congratulations Andy!
On Mon, Feb 4, 2019, 3:29 PM Philipp Moritz Congratulations!
>
> On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:16 PM Krisztián Szűcs
> wrote:
>
> > Congrats Andy! :)
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 4:39 PM Wes McKinney wrote:
> >
> > > The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Arrow has
nk we (dremio) need to better understand impact. Praveen, maybe you
> > could take a look at impact?
> >
> > On Wed, Nov 14, 2018, 4:27 PM Bryan Cutler >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I'm picking this back up again and have WIP pr at
> > > htt
These all sound good to me Micah, thanks for taking this on! Regarding the
javadoc codestyle in (2), I believe it was disabled because there were just
too many issues of missing docs at the time. Any documentation additions
are definitely welcome and hopefully we can eventually enable the check :
Congratulations Chao!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 9:27 AM Neville Dipale
wrote:
> Congratulations Chao and Paddy! I'm loving the increase in velocity on the
> Rust side
>
> On Thu, 28 Feb 2019, 17:17 Wes McKinney, wrote:
>
> > thank you Chao, and welcome!
> >
> > On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 6:18 AM pad
Congratulations Paddy!
On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 7:14 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> Welcome Paddy and thank you!
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2019 at 4:29 AM Uwe L. Korn wrote:
> >
> > On behalf of the Arrow PMC, I'm happy to announce that Paddy has an
> > accepted an invitation to become a committer on Apac
Attendees:
Praveen Kumar
Siddharth Teotia
Bryan Cutler
Since there were not many participants this time, we concluded early.
On Wed, Mar 20, 2019 at 8:37 AM Wes McKinney wrote:
> I'm unable to join today due to a scheduling conflict
>
> https://meet.google.com/vtm-teks-phx
>
Hi All,
Recently I have been working with the TensorFlow SIG-IO community to
introduce Apache Arrow based Datasets for bringing Arrow data into
TensorFlow. SIG-IO is a community maintained repository focused on
input/output support for TF, see https://github.com/tensorflow/io (a lot of
formats fro
aryArray with 64-bit
> offsets, so that buffers can be arbitrarily large (well, within 64-bit
> address space at least)
>
> - Wes
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2019 at 1:24 PM Bryan Cutler wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Recently I have been working with the Tens
+1 (non-binding)
Ran:
ARROW_HAVE_CUDA=NO dev/release/verify-release-candidate.sh source 0.13.0 4
With tests:
: ${TEST_DEFAULT:=1}
: ${TEST_JAVA:=${TEST_DEFAULT}}
: ${TEST_CPP:=${TEST_DEFAULT}}
: ${TEST_GLIB:=0}
: ${TEST_RUBY:=0}
: ${TEST_PYTHON:=${TEST_DEFAULT}}
: ${TEST_JS:=0}
:
ates
>
> Thanks,
> --
> kou
>
> In
> "Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Arrow 0.13.0 - RC4" on Thu, 28 Mar 2019
> 12:10:13 -0700,
> Bryan Cutler wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Ran:
> > ARROW_HAVE_CUDA=NO dev/release/verify-release
+1 (non-binding)
On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 7:52 AM Jacques Nadeau wrote:
> I'm +1 to all four (binding)
>
> On Wed, Apr 3, 2019 at 1:56 AM Antoine Pitrou wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Le 03/04/2019 à 02:05, Wes McKinney a écrit :
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > David Li has proposed to make the following additions o
1 - 100 of 311 matches
Mail list logo
