Re: Function name and format change in the codebase
BTW, in the latest/greatest version of the world, where -'s are dying, all of the SQL++ materials are there - folks should start using it! (You can start with the 101.) Please open issues if you have issues with any of the docs, or encounter bugs. As I helped work on those artifacts, I found that queries felt less verbose and a bit more natural in SQL++ versus their AQL equivalents. I'm thinking that one of the main things we should advertise in our first top-level release is the newly available SQL++ face. (Folks should start making mental lists of the things we need to remember to mention as being "new" in that release - since it's been so long) On 10/14/16 10:52 PM, Yingyi Bu wrote: +1. For (1), the eventual goal is to only have underscores. Currently it's a transition period -- all docs are based on underscores. For new functions, it's good to only support underscores. I think that we'll end the life of hyphens after some time. Best, Yingyi On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Till Westmann wrote: I think that the answer to both questions is "yes". My 2c, Till On 14 Oct 2016, at 18:04, Taewoo Kim wrote: Hi All, I would like to talk about 1) Function name convention and Format change in the codebase. 1) Function name When we invent a new function name, would it be better if we avoid using '-'(dash) in a new function name and use "_" instead to avoid two versions for the same function in AQL and SQL++? 2) Format change in the codebase When we modify a java source file, is it better to apply format changes to the whole file or the lines that we only touch? For history perspective, I think the latter is desirable. Best, Taewoo
Re: Function name and format change in the codebase
Agreed - yes to both. On 10/14/16 6:36 PM, Till Westmann wrote: I think that the answer to both questions is "yes". My 2c, Till On 14 Oct 2016, at 18:04, Taewoo Kim wrote: Hi All, I would like to talk about 1) Function name convention and Format change in the codebase. 1) Function name When we invent a new function name, would it be better if we avoid using '-'(dash) in a new function name and use "_" instead to avoid two versions for the same function in AQL and SQL++? 2) Format change in the codebase When we modify a java source file, is it better to apply format changes to the whole file or the lines that we only touch? For history perspective, I think the latter is desirable. Best, Taewoo
Re: Function name and format change in the codebase
+1. For (1), the eventual goal is to only have underscores. Currently it's a transition period -- all docs are based on underscores. For new functions, it's good to only support underscores. I think that we'll end the life of hyphens after some time. Best, Yingyi On Fri, Oct 14, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Till Westmann wrote: > I think that the answer to both questions is "yes". > > My 2c, > Till > > On 14 Oct 2016, at 18:04, Taewoo Kim wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > I would like to talk about 1) Function name convention and Format change > in > > the codebase. > > > > 1) Function name > > When we invent a new function name, would it be better if we avoid using > > '-'(dash) in a new function name and use "_" instead to avoid two > versions > > for the same function in AQL and SQL++? > > > > 2) Format change in the codebase > > When we modify a java source file, is it better to apply format changes > to > > the whole file or the lines that we only touch? For history perspective, > I > > think the latter is desirable. > > > > Best, > > Taewoo >
Re: Function name and format change in the codebase
I think that the answer to both questions is "yes". My 2c, Till On 14 Oct 2016, at 18:04, Taewoo Kim wrote: > Hi All, > > I would like to talk about 1) Function name convention and Format change in > the codebase. > > 1) Function name > When we invent a new function name, would it be better if we avoid using > '-'(dash) in a new function name and use "_" instead to avoid two versions > for the same function in AQL and SQL++? > > 2) Format change in the codebase > When we modify a java source file, is it better to apply format changes to > the whole file or the lines that we only touch? For history perspective, I > think the latter is desirable. > > Best, > Taewoo
Function name and format change in the codebase
Hi All, I would like to talk about 1) Function name convention and Format change in the codebase. 1) Function name When we invent a new function name, would it be better if we avoid using '-'(dash) in a new function name and use "_" instead to avoid two versions for the same function in AQL and SQL++? 2) Format change in the codebase When we modify a java source file, is it better to apply format changes to the whole file or the lines that we only touch? For history perspective, I think the latter is desirable. Best, Taewoo
