Re: test

Initial email in this channel > 在 2018年12月11日，下午5:47，Tan,Zhongyi 写道： > > - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@brpc.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@brpc.apache.org

Re: Release checklist application

Hi, Very appreciate your works @Justin, we will try to followup and give some feedback in practice :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2018年12月17日，下午5:46，Justin Mclean 写道： > > Hi, > > Hopefully everyone is familiar with the incubator checklist that was created > a few months back [1] > > I r

Re: can we start the process to transfer repo to GitHub/apache?

Hi, Since every initial committer’s ICLA confirmation letter has been send to private mail list, we could do it by ourselves. Dose any committer willing to do it ? Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2018年12月28日，上午9:10，Tan,Zhongyi 写道： > > CC secretary，please confirm that： >Brpc's SGA has been

Re: Missing podling reports due today 2nd January

Hi, I think we have finished the ICLA sign-off and continue to move the ip to Apache, right? Could we prepare to report this month, does anyone would like to arrange as the template :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2019年1月2日，下午2:47，Justin Mclean 写道： > > Hi, > > A higher than usual numbe

[NOTICE] The second report for incubating in Apache

y are doing a great job but they are early > stage so I hope it's ok. > -- > Kevin A. McGrail > VP Fundraising, Apache Software Foundation > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 > > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at

Re: hi，guys，if you have subscribed this mail list，please reply with +1

Hi, It would be helpful if we could do self-introduction when we first assemble in the brpc community, anyone want to begin :-) Best Regards, Von Gosling > 在 2019年1月4日，上午12:10，Hu,Wenwei 写道： > > +1 > > Wenwei Hu > > 原始邮件 > 主题：Re: hi，guys，if you have subscribed this mail li

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc02

Hi, It seems we already close to the first release in apache podling. if any blockers exist, please let mentors know. Come on. Best Regards, Von Gosling > On Sep 23, 2019, at 8:36 AM, tan zhongyi wrote: > > Please make a tag， and we can go with rc03.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.6-rc03

Hi, -1, there are still many places need to be corrected. 1. Highly recommended use the apache mail to sign your release while not zhujiashun2...@gmail.com . 2. The mail list is recommended to discuss issues while not join QQ-group 498837325. 3. Do not throw

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc01

-1 asc and sha512 signature ok, but NOTICE and LICENSE seems to be a slight problem like the following. Some licenses listed in the LICESE doesn't match my checking path(src/butil/third_party/valgrind/valgrind.h, where is third_party in src tarball?). What’s more, why imported so many test and

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc01

CENSE, line 386, any problem for it? > 3. we modified some files from chromium, which is BSD license, BSD is > compatible with apache v2. > > 在 2019/11/19 下午8:06，“Gosling Von” 写入: > >-1 > >asc and sha512 signature ok, but NOTICE and LICENSE seems to be a slight

Re: please review pod report for brpc Dec 2019

Hi, Good catch @Tan. Thanks @Justin kindly suggestion :-) We're helping shape the first release for brpc, and there is one last step away. This solid step forward will bring encouragement to the community. Of course, I personally think the brpc community activity needs to be improved, we can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE is fine comparing to the last version p.s It would be best to collect together two or three votes from your our mentor@Kevin @JB before call for vote in IPMC mail list.

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc02

Hi, +1 (binding) I checked: - incubating in name - signatures and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE is fine - NOTICE is fine comparing the last version - no unexpected binary files p.s It would be best to collect together two or three votes from your our mentor@kevin before call for vot

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

Hi, Before vote +1, we must make clear that Category B license including in brpc. I found there is one paragraph said on the website[1]. I would like to leave my last vote on this issue :-) “ Unless otherwise specified, all Category B licensed works should be included in binary-only form in

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache brpc(incubating) 0.9.7-rc03

Hi Some reasonable feedback from the Justin since last 0.9.7-rc2 version: - the artefact names must include "incubating “ but this can be easily fixed and the voting doesn’t need to restarted (if this was the only issue) - but it also contains category B code [2] under the CDDL license. - and it