Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Vote is ended because of RC2. On 2020-02-10 11:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
On 2020-02-17 4:00 p.m., Jan Lehnardt wrote: +1 on an RC2, this is exactly what we have them for. Joan, if the tarball passes on Friday 21st, you could prepare the binaries then and I'm happy to do the upload dance on the 24th/25th, that assuming you're not already travelling on Friday :) I'll be out of town Thu-Tue, with travel on those outside days, so it doesn't help me much on the binaries. The bintray uploads are currently especially onerous, it's partially scripted in couchdb-pkg (and similarly for couchdb-docker) but you need authorized API keys. -Joan "it's Family Day in Canada, go hug a loved one" Touzet Cheers Jan — On 17. Feb 2020, at 21:20, Joan Touzet wrote: Hey everyone, I have the day off but I wanted to call out this bug and fix: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2559 https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/2560 Do we want to wait for these to build an RC2 and test that? If so, that would change our schedule as follows: Tue Feb 18 - build new RC and start a vote Fri Feb 21 - earliest the new RC could pass the vote (min. 72 hours) Mon Feb 24 - push the source tarball Tue Feb 25 - release and announce Note that Tue Feb 25 is a travel day for me, so the binaries would appear no earlier than that evening. We could do the same delay as I'd proposed this week if desired; push the tarball on Tue Feb 25 and announce on Wed Feb 26. -Joan FYI I am away from Feb 20-25. On 2020-02-13 11:56 a.m., Joan Touzet wrote: With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we need to stop the release, we will. Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up: Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going - Push binary packages to bintray.org - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image Any objections? -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: +1 Checked on Mac OS Mojave. On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
+1 on an RC2, this is exactly what we have them for. Joan, if the tarball passes on Friday 21st, you could prepare the binaries then and I'm happy to do the upload dance on the 24th/25th, that assuming you're not already travelling on Friday :) Cheers Jan — > On 17. Feb 2020, at 21:20, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Hey everyone, > > I have the day off but I wanted to call out this bug and fix: > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2559 > https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/2560 > > Do we want to wait for these to build an RC2 and test that? > > If so, that would change our schedule as follows: > > Tue Feb 18 - build new RC and start a vote > Fri Feb 21 - earliest the new RC could pass the vote (min. 72 hours) > Mon Feb 24 - push the source tarball > Tue Feb 25 - release and announce > > Note that Tue Feb 25 is a travel day for me, so the binaries would > appear no earlier than that evening. We could do the same delay as I'd > proposed this week if desired; push the tarball on Tue Feb 25 and announce on > Wed Feb 26. > > -Joan > > FYI I am away from Feb 20-25. > >> On 2020-02-13 11:56 a.m., Joan Touzet wrote: >> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. >> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice >> if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we >> need to stop the release, we will. >> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday >> is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd >> put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache >> mirrors to catch up: >> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org >>- Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going >>- Push binary packages to bintray.org >>- Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR >>- Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb >> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website >>- Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) >>- Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image >> Any objections? >> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet >>> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> +1 >>> >>> Checked on Mac OS Mojave. >>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet >>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Hey everyone, I have the day off but I wanted to call out this bug and fix: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2559 https://github.com/apache/couchdb/pull/2560 Do we want to wait for these to build an RC2 and test that? If so, that would change our schedule as follows: Tue Feb 18 - build new RC and start a vote Fri Feb 21 - earliest the new RC could pass the vote (min. 72 hours) Mon Feb 24 - push the source tarball Tue Feb 25 - release and announce Note that Tue Feb 25 is a travel day for me, so the binaries would appear no earlier than that evening. We could do the same delay as I'd proposed this week if desired; push the tarball on Tue Feb 25 and announce on Wed Feb 26. -Joan FYI I am away from Feb 20-25. On 2020-02-13 11:56 a.m., Joan Touzet wrote: With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we need to stop the release, we will. Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up: Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going - Push binary packages to bintray.org - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image Any objections? -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: +1 Checked on Mac OS Mojave. On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Some of our internal teams reported that the cluster seedlist function is broken in RC1. I was able to reproduce and filed https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2559 to track. On Sat, 15 Feb 2020 at 01:23, Joan Touzet wrote: > On 2020-02-14 5:49 p.m., Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, at 20:13, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > >>> Please cast your votes now. > >> > >> +1 > >> > >> - FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 > >> - SM185 & SM60 > >> - OTP 22.2.6 > > > > also a very excited double-plus-one for ... drumroll ... > > > > FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT aarch64 / armv8 < aw > > - SM60 with very latest patches 60.9.0_1 > > - OTP 21.3.8.11 > > > > Finished in 58.4 seconds > > 301 tests, 0 failures, 24 excluded > > > > Randomized with seed 566866 > > gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0' > > root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # uname -a > > FreeBSD a01 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r357847: Thu Feb 13 > 04:15:31 UTC 2020 > r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC > arm64 > > root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # > > > > I've left both of these running in a loop, but so far I've had over an > hour without any issue. Very very excited. > > Thanks Dave, that confirms my suspicions, that the packages in CentOS > and Debian are just a bit too far behind the tip of 60esr. If you can > isolate the problem to a very specific patch, we can both push that > patch to the Linux distros as well as update our release notes / build > guidance. With new distro packages we could even rebuild our releases to > use those builds. That is, if you have the time ;) > > -Joan >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
On 2020-02-14 5:49 p.m., Dave Cottlehuber wrote: On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, at 20:13, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: Please cast your votes now. +1 - FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 - SM185 & SM60 - OTP 22.2.6 also a very excited double-plus-one for ... drumroll ... FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT aarch64 / armv8 < aw - SM60 with very latest patches 60.9.0_1 - OTP 21.3.8.11 Finished in 58.4 seconds 301 tests, 0 failures, 24 excluded Randomized with seed 566866 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0' root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # uname -a FreeBSD a01 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r357847: Thu Feb 13 04:15:31 UTC 2020 r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64 root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # I've left both of these running in a loop, but so far I've had over an hour without any issue. Very very excited. Thanks Dave, that confirms my suspicions, that the packages in CentOS and Debian are just a bit too far behind the tip of 60esr. If you can isolate the problem to a very specific patch, we can both push that patch to the Linux distros as well as update our release notes / build guidance. With new distro packages we could even rebuild our releases to use those builds. That is, if you have the time ;) -Joan
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
On Fri, 14 Feb 2020, at 20:13, Dave Cottlehuber wrote: > > Please cast your votes now. > > +1 > > - FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64 > - SM185 & SM60 > - OTP 22.2.6 also a very excited double-plus-one for ... drumroll ... FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT aarch64 / armv8 < aw - SM60 with very latest patches 60.9.0_1 - OTP 21.3.8.11 Finished in 58.4 seconds 301 tests, 0 failures, 24 excluded Randomized with seed 566866 gmake[1]: Leaving directory '/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0' root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # uname -a FreeBSD a01 13.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT #0 r357847: Thu Feb 13 04:15:31 UTC 2020 r...@releng1.nyi.freebsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/arm64.aarch64/sys/GENERIC arm64 root@a01:/tmp/apache-couchdb-3.0.0 # I've left both of these running in a loop, but so far I've had over an hour without any issue. Very very excited. A+ Dave — sent from my Couch
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
On Mon, 10 Feb 2020, at 16:33, Joan Touzet wrote:
> Dear community,
>
> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>
> Candidate release notes:
>
> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release
> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release
> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in!
> (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community
> feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.)
>
> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here:
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1
>
> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512
> checksums.
>
> Please follow the test procedure here:
>
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release
>
> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these
> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0.
>
> Please cast your votes now.
+1
- FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT amd64
- SM185 & SM60
- OTP 22.2.6
Also huge shout-out to Joan in recognition of the significant amount of time
which you've put in here not just for this release but also the huge CI
refactoring over the last months. It's incredibly incredible!
I do get a build failure on FreeBSD 13.0-CURRENT aarch64 (armv8) for couchjs.
Only SM60 is available on arm-flavoured FreeBSD so I had high hopes :-(
https://freshports.org/lang/spidermonkey60 and there's a commit which I don't
yet have which *might* help
12 Jan 2020 22:34:38
Original commit files touched by this commit 60.9.0_1
Revision:522842
Add simple patch to fix undefined symbol problems when trying to build
gjs with this spidermonkey version.
taken from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1426865
Given that I would be the only user for this release on this combo, let's not
block it. But if somebody has suggestions on what to do, I'm all ears, and I'll
try with these patches over the weekend.
ld: error: undefined symbol: void
js::UnsafeTraceManuallyBarrieredEdge(JSTracer*, JS::Value*, char
const*)
...
In file included from priv/couch_js/60/main.cpp:27:
In file included from /usr/local/include/mozjs-60/js/Wrapper.h:12:
/usr/local/include/mozjs-60/js/Proxy.h:206:43: warning: offset of on
non-standard-layout type 'js::BaseProxyHandler' [-Winvalid-offsetof]
static size_t offsetOfFamily() { return offsetof(BaseProxyHandler, mFamily); }
^ ~~~
/usr/include/stddef.h:75:31: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(type, field) __offsetof(type, field)
^~
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:476:34: note: expanded from macro '__offsetof'
#define __offsetof(type, field) __builtin_offsetof(type, field)
^~
1 warning generated.
Compiling priv/couch_js/60/utf8.cpp
In file included from priv/couch_js/60/utf8.cpp:16:
In file included from /usr/local/include/mozjs-60/js/Wrapper.h:12:
/usr/local/include/mozjs-60/js/Proxy.h:206:43: warning: offset of on
non-standard-layout type 'js::BaseProxyHandler' [-Winvalid-offsetof]
static size_t offsetOfFamily() { return offsetof(BaseProxyHandler, mFamily); }
^ ~~~
/usr/include/stddef.h:75:31: note: expanded from macro 'offsetof'
#define offsetof(type, field) __offsetof(type, field)
^~
/usr/include/sys/cdefs.h:476:34: note: expanded from macro '__offsetof'
#define __offsetof(type, field) __builtin_offsetof(type, field)
^~
1 warning generated.
Compiling priv/couch_js/60/util.cpp
Compiling priv/icu_driver/couch_icu_driver.c
Compiling priv/couch_ejson_compare/couch_ejson_compare.c
ld: error: undefined symbol: void
js::UnsafeTraceManuallyBarrieredEdge(JSTracer*, JS::Value*, char
const*)
>>> referenced by Value.h:1230 (/usr/local/include/mozjs-60/js/Value.h:1230)
>>>
>>> priv/couch_js/60/util.o:(JS::GCPolicy::trace(JSTracer*,
>>> JS::Value*, char const*))
c++: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation)
ERROR: sh(c++ priv/couch_js/60/http.o priv/couch_js/60/main.o
priv/couch_js/60/utf8.o priv/couch_js/60/util.o -L/usr/local/lib -std=c++14
-lmozjs-60 -lm -DHAVE_CURL -lcurl
-L"/usr/local/lib/erlang/lib/erl_interface-3.11.3/lib" -lerl_interface -lei -o
priv/couchjs)
failed with return code 1 and the following output:
ld: error: undefined symbol: void
js::UnsafeTraceManuallyBarrieredEdge(JSTracer*, JS::Value*, char
const*)
>>> referenced by Value.h:1230 (/usr/local/include/mozjs-60/js/Value.h:1230)
>>>
>>> priv/couch_js/60/util.o:(JS::GCPolicy::trace(JSTracer*,
>>> JS::
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 17:30, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> Do these fail consistently or do they pass after a few tries?
I startetd the tests various times and there are always the same tests failing.
So it’s constant yes.
All the best
Andy
>
> We are constantly improving the tests, but on occasion, we have some false
> failures in there.
>
> Best
> Jan
> —
>
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 17:00, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>
>> * Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
>> * Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]
>>
>> * All sigs are ok
>> * configure ok
>> * make check:
>>
>> ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
>> ERROR: eunit failed while processing
>> /private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
>> make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
>> make: *** [check] Error 2
>>
>> Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is
>> this:
>>
>> module 'chttpd_view_test'
>> chttpd view tests
>> chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
>> in function
>> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1
>> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
>> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
>> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
>> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
>> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
>> output:<<"">>
>>
>> chttpd_view_test:91:
>> should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
>> in function
>> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1
>> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
>> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
>> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
>> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
>> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
>> output:<<"">>
>>
>> chttpd_view_test:108:
>> should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
>> in function
>> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1
>> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
>> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
>> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
>> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
>> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
>> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
>> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
>> output:<<"">>
>>
>> Is this critical
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>>
On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
> I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
>
> sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
> sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly
> formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>
if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option
works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
>>>
>>> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted
>>> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and
>>> not using —check it is fixed.
>>>
>>> Thanks Jan!
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
Best
Jan
—
> I installed coreutils vi brew
>
> Andy ideo on this?
>
> All the best
>
> Andy
> --
> Andy Wenk
> Hamburg
>
> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
>
>
>
>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 1)
>>
>> Checksums and sig match
>> make check passes cleanly
>>
>>
>>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote:
With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be
nice if someone co
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Do these fail consistently or do they pass after a few tries?
We are constantly improving the tests, but on occasion, we have some false
failures in there.
Best
Jan
—
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 17:00, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
> * Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
> * Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]
>
> * All sigs are ok
> * configure ok
> * make check:
>
> ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
> ERROR: eunit failed while processing
> /private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
> make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
> make: *** [check] Error 2
>
> Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is this:
>
> module 'chttpd_view_test'
> chttpd view tests
>chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
> in function
> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1
> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
> output:<<"">>
>
>chttpd_view_test:91:
> should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
> in function
> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1
> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
> output:<<"">>
>
>chttpd_view_test:108:
> should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
> in function
> chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1
> (test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
> in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
> in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
> in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
> in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
> in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
> **error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
> output:<<"">>
>
> Is this critical
>
>
>
>
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk wrote:
I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly
formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>>>
>>> if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option
>>> works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
>>>
>>> For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
>>
>> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted
>> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and not
>> using —check it is fixed.
>>
>> Thanks Jan!
>>
>> All the best
>>
>> Andy
>>
>>>
>>> Best
>>> Jan
>>> —
>>>
I installed coreutils vi brew
Andy ideo on this?
All the best
Andy
--
Andy Wenk
Hamburg
GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
>
> +1
>
> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 1)
>
> Checksums and sig match
> make check passes cleanly
>
>
>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote:
>>>
>>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
>>>
>>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be
>>> nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as
>>> well. If we need to stop the release, we will.
>>
>> I have checked all signatures to be fine.
>>
>>>
>>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As
>>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things ou
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
* Mac OS X 10.15.3 (Catalina)
* Erlang/OTP 22 [erts-10.6.2]
* All sigs are ok
* configure ok
* make check:
ERROR: One or more eunit tests failed.
ERROR: eunit failed while processing
/private/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0/src/chttpd: rebar_abort
make[1]: *** [eunit] Error 1
make: *** [check] Error 2
Not sure what the difference is between eunit and check. What I found is this:
module 'chttpd_view_test'
chttpd view tests
chttpd_view_test:75: should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys...*failed*
in function
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_keys/1-fun-2-'/1
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 77)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
output:<<"">>
chttpd_view_test:91:
should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip...*failed*
in function
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_queries_limit_skip/1-fun-4-'/1
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 93)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
output:<<"">>
chttpd_view_test:108:
should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries...*failed*
in function
chttpd_view_test:'-should_succeed_on_view_with_multiple_queries/1-fun-5-'/1
(test/eunit/chttpd_view_test.erl, line 110)
in call from eunit_test:run_testfun/1 (eunit_test.erl, line 71)
in call from eunit_proc:run_test/1 (eunit_proc.erl, line 510)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 335)
in call from eunit_proc:handle_test/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 493)
in call from eunit_proc:tests_inorder/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 435)
in call from eunit_proc:with_timeout/3 (eunit_proc.erl, line 325)
in call from eunit_proc:run_group/2 (eunit_proc.erl, line 549)
**error:{badmatch,{error,req_timedout}}
output:<<"">>
Is this critical
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 15:45, Andy Wenk wrote:
>
>>
>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:27, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk wrote:
>>>
>>> I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem:
>>>
>>> sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256
>>> sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly
>>> formatted SHA256 checksum lines found
>>>
>>
>> if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option
>> works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually.
>>
>> For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :)
>
> ah see … I wrote a script for the process and I just pasted
> apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 in it … with using the whole filename and not
> using —check it is fixed.
>
> Thanks Jan!
>
> All the best
>
> Andy
>
>>
>> Best
>> Jan
>> —
>>
>>> I installed coreutils vi brew
>>>
>>> Andy ideo on this?
>>>
>>> All the best
>>>
>>> Andy
>>> --
>>> Andy Wenk
>>> Hamburg
>>>
>>> GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote:
+1
MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 1)
Checksums and sig match
make check passes cleanly
> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote:
>>
>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing.
>>
>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be
>> nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as
>> well. If we need to stop the release, we will.
>
> I have checked all signatures to be fine.
>
>>
>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As
>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one
>> day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24
>> hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up:
>>
>> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org
>> - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going
>> - Push binary packages to bintray.org
>> - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR
>> - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
> On 14. Feb 2020, at 12:22, Andy Wenk wrote: > > I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem: > > sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 > sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly > formatted SHA256 checksum lines found > if you edit the checksum file and add the filename, the --check option works, or you run without --check and compare the hashes manually. For the release I suggest we fix the checksum files of course :) Best Jan — > I installed coreutils vi brew > > Andy ideo on this? > > All the best > > Andy > -- > Andy Wenk > Hamburg > > GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29 > > > >> On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote: >> >> +1 >> >> MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 1) >> >> Checksums and sig match >> make check passes cleanly >> >> >>> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote: With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we need to stop the release, we will. >>> >>> I have checked all signatures to be fine. >>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up: Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going - Push binary packages to bintray.org - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image Any objections? >>> >>> None. >>> >>> Best >>> Jan >>> — -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > +1 > Checked on Mac OS Mojave. >> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Dear community, >> >> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >> >> Candidate release notes: >> >> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release >> is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! >> (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community >> feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) >> >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 >> >> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 >> checksums. >> >> Please follow the test procedure here: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release >> >> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these >> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >> >> Please cast your votes now. >> >> Thanks, >> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet >>> >>> -- >>> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: >>> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >> >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
I am on Mac OS Catalina and have the following problem: sha256sum --check apache-couchdb-*.tar.gz.sha256 sha256sum: apache-couchdb-3.0.0-RC1.tar.gz.sha256: no properly formatted SHA256 checksum lines found I installed coreutils vi brew Andy ideo on this? All the best Andy -- Andy Wenk Hamburg GPG fingerprint C32E 275F BCF3 9DF6 4E55 21BD 45D3 5653 77F9 3D29 > On 13. Feb 2020, at 21:43, rnew...@apache.org wrote: > > +1 > > MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 1) > > Checksums and sig match > make check passes cleanly > > >> On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >>> >>> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote: >>> >>> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. >>> >>> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice >>> if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we >>> need to stop the release, we will. >> >> I have checked all signatures to be fine. >> >>> >>> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As >>> Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. >>> That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for >>> the Apache mirrors to catch up: >>> >>> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org >>> - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going >>> - Push binary packages to bintray.org >>> - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR >>> - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb >>> >>> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website >>> - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) >>> - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image >>> >>> Any objections? >> >> None. >> >> Best >> Jan >> — >>> >>> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet >>> >>> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: +1 Checked on Mac OS Mojave. > On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Dear community, > > I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > Candidate release notes: > > https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release > is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only > PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to > gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) > > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 > > There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > checksums. > > Please follow the test procedure here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > Please cast your votes now. > > Thanks, > Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet >> >> -- >> Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: >> https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
+1 MacOS 10.15.3 (ulimit -n 1) Checksums and sig match make check passes cleanly > On 13 Feb 2020, at 17:55, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> >> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. >> >> Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice >> if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we >> need to stop the release, we will. > > I have checked all signatures to be fine. > >> >> Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday >> is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd >> put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache >> mirrors to catch up: >> >> Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org >> - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going >> - Push binary packages to bintray.org >> - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR >> - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb >> >> Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website >> - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) >> - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image >> >> Any objections? > > None. > > Best > Jan > — >> >> -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet >> >> On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>> +1 >>> Checked on Mac OS Mojave. On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet > > -- > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
> On 13. Feb 2020, at 17:56, Joan Touzet wrote: > > With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. > > Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice > if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we > need to stop the release, we will. I have checked all signatures to be fine. > > Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday > is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd > put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache > mirrors to catch up: > > Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org > - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going > - Push binary packages to bintray.org > - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR > - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb > > Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website > - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) > - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image > > Any objections? None. Best Jan — > > -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet > > On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> +1 >> Checked on Mac OS Mojave. >>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: >>> >>> Dear community, >>> >>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >>> >>> Candidate release notes: >>> >>>https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is >>> made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC >>> members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge >>> if an official release is ready to be made.) >>> >>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: >>> >>>https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 >>> >>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 >>> checksums. >>> >>> Please follow the test procedure here: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release >>> >>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these >>> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >>> >>> Please cast your votes now. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet -- Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
With this vote, we are now at 3 +1 PMC votes - a minimum for releasing. Everyone - please keep testing and submitting your experience. It'd be nice if someone could double check the GPG signing and checksums as well. If we need to stop the release, we will. Our typical policy is to release on Tuesdays for widest publicity. As Monday is a public holiday in Canada, I suggest we push things out one day. That'd put us on the following schedule, since we must wait 24 hours for the Apache mirrors to catch up: Tue Feb 18 - Push apache-couchdb-3.0.0.tar.gz* to dist.apache.org - Push Mac/Win binaries wherever they are going - Push binary packages to bintray.org - Test and merge 3.0.0 Docker PR - Push new Docker image to apache/couchdb Wed Feb 19 - Update couchdb.apache.org website - Announce widely (twitter, blog, announce@a.o, etc.) - Open downstream Docker PR for top-level couchdb image Any objections? -Joan "break me off a piece of that Kit Kat bar" Touzet On 2020-02-13 8:11, Jan Lehnardt wrote: +1 Checked on Mac OS Mojave. On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
also verified make check passes on CentOS 8 with SM60 using the standard mozjs60/mozjs60-devel packages. Tested amd64 and ppc64le. I also ran some basic clouseau tests which ran fine. On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 10:47, Will Holley wrote: > +1 make check passing on Centos 7, tested both amd64 and ppc64le. I'm > going to try on Centos 8 next... > > One thing I noticed is that the Unix install instructions look outdated > with respect to Erlang / Node / Python dependencies though I'm not 100% > sure what the supported options are now. > > > > On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 09:27, Peng Hui Jiang wrote: > >> +1 from "Debian 10 Buster on ppc64le" 's point of view. >> >> The test was performed against Debian 10 Buster docker image on Ubuntu >> ppc64le box. >> >> Eunit test can pass but just saw that t_stats_retained_on_job_removal >> might randomly fail due to timeout. Other test including `make javascript` >> and `make elixir` passed fine. >> >> jenkins@15706e15ee21:/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0$ uname -a >> Linux 15706e15ee21 4.15.0-20-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 24 06:14:44 >> UTC 2018 ppc64le GNU/Linux >> jenkins@15706e15ee21:/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0$ lsb_release >> -sirc >> Debian >> 10 >> buster >> >> == >> Peng Hui Jiang >> Beijing >> >> [image: Inactive hide details for Joan Touzet ---2020/02/13 01:35:28 >> PM---The Windows installer improvements are now live at the same U]Joan >> Touzet ---2020/02/13 01:35:28 PM---The Windows installer improvements are >> now live at the same URL below, the installer is called apac >> >> From: Joan Touzet >> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org >> Date: 2020/02/13 01:35 PM >> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1) >> -- >> >> >> >> The Windows installer improvements are now live at the same URL below, >> the installer is called apache-couchdb-3.0.0.1.msi. >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ >> >> LOTS of improvements: >> >> * Prompts for an admin user/password as CouchDB 3.0 requires >> * Will not overwrite existing credentials if in place >> * No longer remove user-modified config files, closing >> apache/couchdb#1989 >> * Also will not overwrite them on install, naturally :) >> * Checkbox to disable installation of the Windows service >> * Silent install support for all the above >> * Friendly link to the online release notes in the exit dialog >> * Higher resolution icon for HiDPI (500x500) >> >> The details are here: >> >> https://github.com/apache/couchdb-glazier/pull/12 >> >> The build runs fine on Windows, obviously, and `make check` passes >> entirely, so this is my official +1 on the RC. >> >> -Joan "If you can see what I can see/When I'm cleanin' windows" Touzet >> >> >> On 2020-02-10 14:36, I wrote: >> > Here are the Windows binaries: >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ >> > >> > NOTE: You have to use Notepad (or similar) as Administrator and edit >> > your local.ini file before the service will start correctly. >> > >> > I've got a few minor things planned for the Windows installer to >> improve >> > on it, including prompting for an admin user on install, but this is >> > functional for now. >> > >> > Linux binaries of various flavours are being built right now. >> > >> > -Joan >> > >> > On 2020-02-10 13:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> >> Hey all, >> >> >> >> Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: >> >> >> >> >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ >> >> >> >> Best >> >> Jan >> >> — >> >> >> >>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Dear community, >> >>> >> >>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >> >>> >> >>> Candidate release notes: >> >>> >> >>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html >> >>> >> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> >>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the >> >>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig >> >>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on >> >>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be >> made.) >> >>> >> >>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: >> >>> >> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 >> >>> >> >>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 >> >>> checksums. >> >>> >> >>> Please follow the test procedure here: >> >>> >> >>> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release >> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, >> >>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >> >>> >> >>> Please cast your votes now. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet >> >> >> >> >> >> >>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
+1 Checked on Mac OS Mojave. > On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Dear community, > > I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > Candidate release notes: > >https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts > so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. > Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members > have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an > official release is ready to be made.) > > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 > > There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. > > Please follow the test procedure here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > Please cast your votes now. > > Thanks, > Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
+1 make check passing on Centos 7, tested both amd64 and ppc64le. I'm going to try on Centos 8 next... One thing I noticed is that the Unix install instructions look outdated with respect to Erlang / Node / Python dependencies though I'm not 100% sure what the supported options are now. On Thu, 13 Feb 2020 at 09:27, Peng Hui Jiang wrote: > +1 from "Debian 10 Buster on ppc64le" 's point of view. > > The test was performed against Debian 10 Buster docker image on Ubuntu > ppc64le box. > > Eunit test can pass but just saw that t_stats_retained_on_job_removal > might randomly fail due to timeout. Other test including `make javascript` > and `make elixir` passed fine. > > jenkins@15706e15ee21:/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0$ uname -a > Linux 15706e15ee21 4.15.0-20-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 24 06:14:44 > UTC 2018 ppc64le GNU/Linux > jenkins@15706e15ee21:/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0$ lsb_release > -sirc > Debian > 10 > buster > > == > Peng Hui Jiang > Beijing > > [image: Inactive hide details for Joan Touzet ---2020/02/13 01:35:28 > PM---The Windows installer improvements are now live at the same U]Joan > Touzet ---2020/02/13 01:35:28 PM---The Windows installer improvements are > now live at the same URL below, the installer is called apac > > From: Joan Touzet > To: dev@couchdb.apache.org > Date: 2020/02/13 01:35 PM > Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1) > -- > > > > The Windows installer improvements are now live at the same URL below, > the installer is called apache-couchdb-3.0.0.1.msi. > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ > > LOTS of improvements: > > * Prompts for an admin user/password as CouchDB 3.0 requires > * Will not overwrite existing credentials if in place > * No longer remove user-modified config files, closing > apache/couchdb#1989 > * Also will not overwrite them on install, naturally :) > * Checkbox to disable installation of the Windows service > * Silent install support for all the above > * Friendly link to the online release notes in the exit dialog > * Higher resolution icon for HiDPI (500x500) > > The details are here: > > https://github.com/apache/couchdb-glazier/pull/12 > > The build runs fine on Windows, obviously, and `make check` passes > entirely, so this is my official +1 on the RC. > > -Joan "If you can see what I can see/When I'm cleanin' windows" Touzet > > > On 2020-02-10 14:36, I wrote: > > Here are the Windows binaries: > > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ > > > > > NOTE: You have to use Notepad (or similar) as Administrator and edit > > your local.ini file before the service will start correctly. > > > > I've got a few minor things planned for the Windows installer to improve > > on it, including prompting for an admin user on install, but this is > > functional for now. > > > > Linux binaries of various flavours are being built right now. > > > > -Joan > > > > On 2020-02-10 13:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > >> Hey all, > >> > >> Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: > >> > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ > >> > >> Best > >> Jan > >> — > >> > >>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: > >>> > >>> Dear community, > >>> > >>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > >>> > >>> Candidate release notes: > >>> > >>> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html > >>> > >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > >>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the > >>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig > >>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on > >>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be > made.) > >>> > >>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > >>> > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 > >>> > >>> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > >>> checksums. > >>> > >>> Please follow the test procedure here: > >>> > >>> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > >>> > >>> > >>> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, > >>> these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > >>> > >>> Please cast your votes now. > >>> > >>> Thanks, > >>> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet > >> > > > > >
RE: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
+1 from "Debian 10 Buster on ppc64le" 's point of view. The test was performed against Debian 10 Buster docker image on Ubuntu ppc64le box. Eunit test can pass but just saw that t_stats_retained_on_job_removal might randomly fail due to timeout. Other test including `make javascript` and `make elixir` passed fine. jenkins@15706e15ee21:/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0$ uname -a Linux 15706e15ee21 4.15.0-20-generic #21-Ubuntu SMP Tue Apr 24 06:14:44 UTC 2018 ppc64le GNU/Linux jenkins@15706e15ee21:/tmp/couchdb/dist/apache-couchdb-3.0.0$ lsb_release -sirc Debian 10 buster == Peng Hui Jiang Beijing From: Joan Touzet To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Date: 2020/02/13 01:35 PM Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1) The Windows installer improvements are now live at the same URL below, the installer is called apache-couchdb-3.0.0.1.msi. https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_couchdb_binary_win_3.0.0_rc.1_&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=PKZ65oA9tV05sXjYYyZUJf_d-ASaaLXiLw-gQdWPDsQ&m=FcAonLbpr6gBz07tL5QKB6plV8twOPB93ni1bguSynA&s=iwArBpg3xT7NWJYzy62CKrqFfk78iF2sYpN4ZkPFqZs&e= LOTS of improvements: * Prompts for an admin user/password as CouchDB 3.0 requires * Will not overwrite existing credentials if in place * No longer remove user-modified config files, closing apache/couchdb#1989 * Also will not overwrite them on install, naturally :) * Checkbox to disable installation of the Windows service * Silent install support for all the above * Friendly link to the online release notes in the exit dialog * Higher resolution icon for HiDPI (500x500) The details are here: https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__github.com_apache_couchdb-2Dglazier_pull_12&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=PKZ65oA9tV05sXjYYyZUJf_d-ASaaLXiLw-gQdWPDsQ&m=FcAonLbpr6gBz07tL5QKB6plV8twOPB93ni1bguSynA&s=NksMQCWeGZAnFS61V-Cd8-lLDcnunoL_7zpX8YGMmZU&e= The build runs fine on Windows, obviously, and `make check` passes entirely, so this is my official +1 on the RC. -Joan "If you can see what I can see/When I'm cleanin' windows" Touzet On 2020-02-10 14:36, I wrote: > Here are the Windows binaries: > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_couchdb_binary_win_3.0.0_rc.1_&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=PKZ65oA9tV05sXjYYyZUJf_d-ASaaLXiLw-gQdWPDsQ&m=FcAonLbpr6gBz07tL5QKB6plV8twOPB93ni1bguSynA&s=iwArBpg3xT7NWJYzy62CKrqFfk78iF2sYpN4ZkPFqZs&e= > > NOTE: You have to use Notepad (or similar) as Administrator and edit > your local.ini file before the service will start correctly. > > I've got a few minor things planned for the Windows installer to improve > on it, including prompting for an admin user on install, but this is > functional for now. > > Linux binaries of various flavours are being built right now. > > -Joan > > On 2020-02-10 13:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> Hey all, >> >> Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: >> >> >> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_couchdb_binary_mac_3.0.0_rc.1_&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=PKZ65oA9tV05sXjYYyZUJf_d-ASaaLXiLw-gQdWPDsQ&m=FcAonLbpr6gBz07tL5QKB6plV8twOPB93ni1bguSynA&s=ikPsnRxTzLh8_x2P3ZeHVppWrgX1pYy9zpfHOv6AaKo&e= >> >> Best >> Jan >> — >> >>> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: >>> >>> Dear community, >>> >>> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >>> >>> Candidate release notes: >>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__docs.couchdb.org_en_latest_whatsnew_3.0.html&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=PKZ65oA9tV05sXjYYyZUJf_d-ASaaLXiLw-gQdWPDsQ&m=FcAonLbpr6gBz07tL5QKB6plV8twOPB93ni1bguSynA&s=MCdhpkH5EGGZFOWbPWfaMCSyRTClV-yKgHFAEbYyTcM&e= >>> >>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >>> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the >>> release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig >>> right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on >>> community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) >>> >>> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: >>> >>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__dist.apache.org_repos_dist_dev_couchdb_source_3.0.0_rc.1&d=DwIFaQ&c=jf_iaSHvJObTbx-siA1ZOg&r=PKZ65oA9tV05sXjYYyZUJf_d-ASaaLXiLw-gQdWPDsQ&m=FcAonLbpr6gBz07tL5QKB6plV8twOPB93ni1bguSy
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
The Windows installer improvements are now live at the same URL below, the installer is called apache-couchdb-3.0.0.1.msi. https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ LOTS of improvements: * Prompts for an admin user/password as CouchDB 3.0 requires * Will not overwrite existing credentials if in place * No longer remove user-modified config files, closing apache/couchdb#1989 * Also will not overwrite them on install, naturally :) * Checkbox to disable installation of the Windows service * Silent install support for all the above * Friendly link to the online release notes in the exit dialog * Higher resolution icon for HiDPI (500x500) The details are here: https://github.com/apache/couchdb-glazier/pull/12 The build runs fine on Windows, obviously, and `make check` passes entirely, so this is my official +1 on the RC. -Joan "If you can see what I can see/When I'm cleanin' windows" Touzet On 2020-02-10 14:36, I wrote: Here are the Windows binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ NOTE: You have to use Notepad (or similar) as Administrator and edit your local.ini file before the service will start correctly. I've got a few minor things planned for the Windows installer to improve on it, including prompting for an admin user on install, but this is functional for now. Linux binaries of various flavours are being built right now. -Joan On 2020-02-10 13:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: Hey all, Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ Best Jan — On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
+1 MacOSx 10.15.3 with spidermonkey 60 I had couchdb_update_conflicts_test fail for me with make check. But it passes on it's own. All js, elixir and other eunit tests pass. On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:17 PM Mad, Pink and Dangerous to Know wrote: > Excellent results with the Mac binary both as a fresh installation and on > top of a CouchDB 2 installation. > Both tests on Mojave and not on Catalina. > > Also, can I get clarification... is it an improved llama, or a new llama? > > - > > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:33 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > Update: I had an error in the packaging, I added a new build to the same > > directory with a -1 identifier. > > > > Best > > Jan “Works on my Machine” Lehnardt > > — > > > > > On 10. Feb 2020, at 19:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > > > Hey all, > > > > > > Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: > > > > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ > > > > > > Best > > > Jan > > > — > > > > > >> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: > > >> > > >> Dear community, > > >> > > >> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > >> > > >> Candidate release notes: > > >> > > >> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html > > >> > > >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release > is > > made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only > PMC > > members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to > gauge > > if an official release is ready to be made.) > > >> > > >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > > >> > > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 > > >> > > >> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > > checksums. > > >> > > >> Please follow the test procedure here: > > >> > > >> > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > >> > > >> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > >> > > >> Please cast your votes now. > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet > > > > > > -- > > > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > > > https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ > > > > > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Excellent results with the Mac binary both as a fresh installation and on top of a CouchDB 2 installation. Both tests on Mojave and not on Catalina. Also, can I get clarification... is it an improved llama, or a new llama? - On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 5:33 AM Jan Lehnardt wrote: > Update: I had an error in the packaging, I added a new build to the same > directory with a -1 identifier. > > Best > Jan “Works on my Machine” Lehnardt > — > > > On 10. Feb 2020, at 19:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > > Hey all, > > > > Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: > > > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ > > > > Best > > Jan > > — > > > >> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: > >> > >> Dear community, > >> > >> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > >> > >> Candidate release notes: > >> > >> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html > >> > >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release > artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is > made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC > members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge > if an official release is ready to be made.) > >> > >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > >> > >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 > >> > >> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 > checksums. > >> > >> Please follow the test procedure here: > >> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > >> > >> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > >> > >> Please cast your votes now. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet > > > > -- > > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > > https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ > > > >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Update: I had an error in the packaging, I added a new build to the same directory with a -1 identifier. Best Jan “Works on my Machine” Lehnardt — > On 10. Feb 2020, at 19:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > Hey all, > > Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ > > Best > Jan > — > >> On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: >> >> Dear community, >> >> I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >> >> Candidate release notes: >> >> https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html >> >> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release >> artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is >> made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC >> members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge >> if an official release is ready to be made.) >> >> The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: >> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 >> >> There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. >> >> Please follow the test procedure here: >> >> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release >> >> Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these >> artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. >> >> Please cast your votes now. >> >> Thanks, >> Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet > > -- > Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: > https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/ >
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
And here are the Linux binaries for various distros and platforms: https://repo-nightly.couchdb.org/3.0.x/ If we have to cut another RC, these will automatically be re-generated. As a reminder, repo-nightly.couchdb.org is *only* for members of the immediate CouchDB development community. Do not share this link off-list, and especially not with Twitter, Facebook, or on other social media. FYI, these were delayed because of a frequently failing test case: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/issues/2528 and because the Hypothesis version bump broke builds on Ubuntu Xenial, due to too old of a Python 3 (we apparently now require >= 3.5.3.) -Joan "that's quite enough Couch for the month, thanks" Touzet On 2020-02-10 2:36 p.m., Joan Touzet wrote: Here are the Windows binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ NOTE: You have to use Notepad (or similar) as Administrator and edit your local.ini file before the service will start correctly. I've got a few minor things planned for the Windows installer to improve on it, including prompting for an admin user on install, but this is functional for now. Linux binaries of various flavours are being built right now. -Joan On 2020-02-10 13:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: Hey all, Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ Best Jan — On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Here are the Windows binaries: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/win/3.0.0/rc.1/ NOTE: You have to use Notepad (or similar) as Administrator and edit your local.ini file before the service will start correctly. I've got a few minor things planned for the Windows installer to improve on it, including prompting for an admin user on install, but this is functional for now. Linux binaries of various flavours are being built right now. -Joan On 2020-02-10 13:32, Jan Lehnardt wrote: Hey all, Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ Best Jan — On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: Dear community, I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Candidate release notes: https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an official release is ready to be made.) The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. Please follow the test procedure here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. Please cast your votes now. Thanks, Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0 (-rc1)
Hey all, Mac convenience binaries for your testing pleasure are available here: https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/binary/mac/3.0.0/rc.1/ Best Jan — > On 10. Feb 2020, at 17:33, Joan Touzet wrote: > > Dear community, > > I would like to propose that we release Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > Candidate release notes: > >https://docs.couchdb.org/en/latest/whatsnew/3.0.html > > We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artefacts > so that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. > Everyone is free to vote on this release, so dig right in! (Only PMC members > have binding votes, but they depend on community feedback to gauge if an > official release is ready to be made.) > > The release artefacts we are voting on are available here: > >https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/couchdb/source/3.0.0/rc.1 > > There, you will find a tarball, a GPG signature, and SHA256/SHA512 checksums. > > Please follow the test procedure here: > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/COUCHDB/Testing+a+Source+Release > > Please remember that "RC1" is an annotation. If the vote passes, these > artefacts will be released as Apache CouchDB 3.0.0. > > Please cast your votes now. > > Thanks, > Joan "once in a lifetime" Touzet -- Professional Support for Apache CouchDB: https://neighbourhood.ie/couchdb-support/
