gerhard/thomas
The problem I have with bv is that no one refers to BeanValidation as bv
(in fact, Bean Validation is the shortened form of JavaBeans Validation).
Doing a quick google search on bv shows me some STDs. Since google is
typically stalking me and knows I ask lots of programming
whatever the list is IMO, the point was already mentionned: how many times
did you use bv to say bean validation? You never say Java Persistence
API but always jpa, for bval that's the opposite IMO.
I commonly see bval or beanvalidation but not others.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
even when speaking?
Then the point is who should understand the name, the EG or users.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau https://twitter.com/rmannibucau*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
we never had an issue with that in codi where we use bv since 2010.
regards,
gerhard
2013/6/16 Romain Manni-Bucau rmannibu...@gmail.com
even when speaking?
Then the point is who should understand the name, the EG or users.
*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau
codi is not that used, and not sure bv is explicit enough in all languages.
hibernate uses validator, other can use jsr330/jsr349. Since this module
can be an in between 330 and 349 maybe using jsr330 is good but IMO has the
same drawback as bv. If you don't follow specs and/or dev them you don't
