Hi Ananda,
> -Original Message-
> From: Ananda Sathyanarayana [mailto:ananda at versa-networks.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 6:47 AM
> To: Lu, Wenzhuo
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org; Ananda Sathyanarayana
> Subject: [PATCH] E1000: fix for forced speed/duplex config
>
> From the code,
Hi, Olivier
During the validation work with v16.11-rc2, I find that this patch will cause
VM crash if enable virtio bonding in VM. Could you have a check at your side?
The following is steps at my side. Thanks a lot
1. bind PF port to igb_uio.
modprobe uio
insmod
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 10:39:35AM +0100, Thomas Monjalon wrote:
> 2016-11-01 16:15, Yuanhan Liu:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:58:51AM +0200, Maxime Coquelin wrote:
> > > Agree, what we need is to be able to disable Virtio PMD features
> > > without having to rebuild the PMD.
> >
> > I want
Here is a small patchset of updating vhost programming and sample guide
and comments, due to the removal of vhost-cuse.
---
Yuanhan Liu (3):
doc: update vhost programming guide
doc: update the vhost sample guide
vhost: update comments
doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst|
vhost-cuse has been removed in this release. Update the doc, with the
vhost-cuse part being removed.
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu
---
doc/guides/prog_guide/vhost_lib.rst | 62 +
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 55 deletions(-)
diff --git
vhost-cuse is removed, update corresponding comments that are still
referencing it.
Signed-off-by: Yuanhan Liu
---
examples/tep_termination/main.c | 7 ++-
examples/vhost/main.c | 4 +---
examples/vhost_xen/main.c | 3 +--
lib/librte_vhost/rte_virtio_net.h | 5 ++---
Hi All,
Now we are planning for an sample application for Generic flow
filtering API feature, and I have finished the RFC for this example app.
Now Adrien Mazarguil has send v2 version of Generic flow
filtering API, this sample application RFC is based on that.
Thank you.
Generic flow
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:48:57PM +, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:49 PM
>
> >
> > Hi Community,
> >
> > So far, I have received constructive feedback
Hi, John & Greg
Would you please give any opinion for this patch ?
I have looked through all PMDs and found not all statistics items can be
supported by some NIC.
For example, rx_nombuf, q_ipackets, q_opackets, q_ibytes and q_obytes are
not supported by i40e.
But when the function
For vhost-switch sample, the old guide takes too many words on
vhost-cuse, which is mainly due to vhost-cuse is invented before
vhost-user.
Now vhost-cuse is removed, meaning the best part of the doc is useless.
Instead of amending one piece here and there, this patch simply removes
the most part
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 03:16:18PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:48:57PM +0100, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:49 PM
> >
> > >
> -Original Message-
> From: Dai, Wei
> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 8:29 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon ; Mcnamara, John
> ; Ananyev, Konstantin
> ; Wu, Jingjing ;
> Zhang, Helin ; Dai, Wei ;
> Curran, Greg
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: RE: [dpdk-dev] [PATCH] ethdev: fix statistics
> -Original Message-
> From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Dai, Wei
> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2016 9:29 AM
> To: Thomas Monjalon; Mcnamara, John; Ananyev, Konstantin; Wu, Jingjing;
> Zhang, Helin; Dai, Wei; Curran, Greg
> Cc: dev at dpdk.org
> Subject: Re:
Hello Ben,
Apologies for joining this discussion late.
On 10/24/2016 11:46 PM, Walker, Benjamin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> My name is Ben Walker and I'm the technical lead for SPDK (it's like DPDK, but
> for storage devices). SPDK relies on DPDK only for the base functionality in
> the
> EAL - memory
On 10/26/2016 3:20 AM, Ben Walker wrote:
> If the user asks to probe multiple times, the probe
> callback should only be called on devices that don't have
> a driver already loaded.
>
> This is useful if a driver is registered after the
> execution of a program has started and the list of devices
Fill correctly the Mbuf Rx offloads.
Nelio Laranjeiro (3):
net/mlx5: fix Rx checksum macros
net/mlx5: define explicit fields for Rx offloads
net/mlx: fix support for new Rx checksum flags
drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c | 21 --
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h | 37 +-
Add missing:
- MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV4_PACKET
- MLX5_CQE_RX_IPV6_PACKET
- MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV4_PACKET
- MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IPV6_PACKET
- MLX5_CQE_RX_TUNNEL_PACKET
- MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_IP_CSUM_OK
- MLX5_CQE_RX_OUTER_TCP_UDP_CSUM_OK
Fixes: 51a50a3d9b8f ("net/mlx5: add definitions for data path
This commit redefines the completion queue element structure as the
original lacks the required fields.
Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro
---
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_prm.h | 16 -
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 56 +---
2 files changed, 42
Fixes: 5842289a546c ("mbuf: add new Rx checksum flags")
Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro
---
drivers/net/mlx4/mlx4.c | 21 -
drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 25 ++---
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:11:03PM +, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > -Original Message-
> > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> >
> > So far, I have received constructive feedback from Intel, NXP and Linaro
> > folks.
> > Let me know, if anyone else
On 10/31/2016 11:01 AM, Wang, Zhihong wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Maxime Coquelin [mailto:maxime.coquelin at redhat.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 3:42 PM
>> To: Wang, Zhihong ; Yuanhan Liu
>>
>> Cc: stephen at networkplumber.org; Pierre Pfister (ppfister)
>> ;
Hi Helin,
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 07:19:18AM +, Zhang, Helin wrote:
> Hi Adrien
>
> Just a double check, do you have any update on the v1 patch set, as now it is
> the end of October?
> We are extremly eager to see the v1 patch set for development.
> I don't think we need full validation on
On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:36:48PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:36:46AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:31:41AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 01:54:14PM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:55:22PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:36:48PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:36:46AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 08:31:41AM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at
Hi Mauricio,
On 11/1/2016 7:55 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
> Coverity detected this as an issue because internals->data will never be NULL,
> then the check is not necessary.
>
> Fixes: d082c0395bf6 ("ring: fix memory leak when detaching")
> Coverity issue: 137873
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:17:04PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:11:03PM +, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > >
> > > So far, I have received constructive feedback
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:36:34PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:48:57PM +, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of Jerin Jacob
> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 6:49 PM
> >
> > >
> >
Thomas and DPDK devs,
Almost a year into our DPDK development, we have shipped an alpha version
of our "Arkville" product. We've thankful for all the support from this
group. Most everyone has suggested "get your code upstream ASAP"; but our
team is cut from the "if it isn't tested, it doesn't
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:45:07AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:17:04PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 12:11:03PM +, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
Dear Ferruh,
Maybe I'm wrong, but I cannot see your point.
The code is absolutely the same, only the following line
if (eth_dev->data) {
is actually removed.
fulvio
On 02/11/2016 12:38, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> Hi Mauricio,
>
> On 11/1/2016 7:55 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
>>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:48:37AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:36:34PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:48:57PM +, Van Haaren, Harry wrote:
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: dev [mailto:dev-bounces at dpdk.org] On Behalf Of
> -Original Message-
> From: Trahe, Fiona
> Sent: Wednesday, October 26, 2016 6:24 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: De Lara Guarch, Pablo ; Trahe, Fiona
> ; Griffin, John
> Subject: [PATCH v2] doc/guides: add more info about VT-d/iommu settings
>
> Add more information about VT-d/iommu
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:35:51AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:55:22PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:36:48PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 09:36:46AM +0100, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at
On 11/2/2016 12:49 PM, Fulvio Risso wrote:
> Dear Ferruh,
> Maybe I'm wrong, but I cannot see your point.
> The code is absolutely the same, only the following line
>
> if (eth_dev->data) {
>
> is actually removed.
Please double check the condition "rx_queues" freed:
before the patch:
Coverity detected this as an issue because internals->data will never be NULL,
then the check is not necessary.
Fixes: d082c0395bf6 ("ring: fix memory leak when detaching")
Coverity issue: 137873
Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
---
drivers/net/ring/rte_eth_ring.c | 28
Nelio Laranjeiro (2):
doc: update mlx5 dependencies
doc: add mlx5 release notes
doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 8 +-
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 136 ++---
2 files changed, 114 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
--
2.1.4
Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro
---
doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
index 0d1fabb..98d1341 100644
--- a/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
+++ b/doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst
@@ -241,12
Add list of tested and validated NICs too.
Signed-off-by: Nelio Laranjeiro
---
doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 136 ++---
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst
Dear Ferruh,
You are right, I messed up the brackets.
I already sent v3.
Thanks,
Mauricio.
On 11/02/2016 08:15 AM, Ferruh Yigit wrote:
> On 11/2/2016 12:49 PM, Fulvio Risso wrote:
>> Dear Ferruh,
>> Maybe I'm wrong, but I cannot see your point.
>> The code is absolutely the same, only the
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 06:39:27PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:35:51AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:55:22PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 02:36:48PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at
On 11/2/2016 1:46 PM, Mauricio Vasquez B wrote:
> Coverity detected this as an issue because internals->data will never be NULL,
> then the check is not necessary.
>
> Fixes: d082c0395bf6 ("ring: fix memory leak when detaching")
> Coverity issue: 137873
>
> Signed-off-by: Mauricio Vasquez B
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
> Sent: Friday, October 28, 2016 12:37 PM
> To: dev at dpdk.org
> Cc: Trahe, Fiona ; De Lara Guarch, Pablo
> ; Griffin, John intel.com>;
> Jain, Deepak K ; Kusztal, ArkadiuszX
>
> Subject: [PATCH] app/test: fix wrong pointer values in
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 01:56:27PM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 06:39:27PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:35:51AM +, Bruce Richardson wrote:
> > > On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:55:22PM +0530, Jerin Jacob wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at
Self-Nack.
After an internal review of ABI breakage announcements we found a way of
achieving this with an ABI change.
-Original Message-
From: Stroe, Laura
Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 12:23 PM
To: dev at dpdk.org
Cc: Stroe, Laura
Subject: [PATCH] doc: announce ABI changes in
Hi all,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 08:39:31AM +, Lu, Wenzhuo wrote:
> Correct the typo of receiver.
>
> Hi Adrien,
> The change from struct ip_frag_pkt pkt[0] to struct ip_frag_pkt pkt[] will
> make IP reassembly not working. I think this is not the root cause. Maybe
> Konstantin can give us
I have posted the following messages on users at dpdk.organd it seems that
it was the wrong mailing list:
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2016-March/000340.html
http://dpdk.org/ml/archives/users/2016-September/001026.html
I also include the message here for convenience:
I can consistently
Hi Wei,
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 05:27:50AM +, Zhao1, Wei wrote:
> Hi All,
> Now we are planning for an sample application for Generic flow
> filtering API feature, and I have finished the RFC for this example app.
> Now Adrien Mazarguil has send v2 version of Generic flow
> filtering
On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:13:27AM +, Elad Persiko wrote:
> Constraint alignment was not respected in Tx.
>
> Fixes: 1d88ba171942 ("net/mlx5: refactor Tx data path")
>
> Signed-off-by: Elad Persiko
> ---
> drivers/net/mlx5/mlx5_rxtx.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 11:39:36AM +0100, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> Fill correctly the Mbuf Rx offloads.
>
> Nelio Laranjeiro (3):
> net/mlx5: fix Rx checksum macros
> net/mlx5: define explicit fields for Rx offloads
> net/mlx: fix support for new Rx checksum flags
>
>
On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 02:46:42PM +0100, Nelio Laranjeiro wrote:
> Nelio Laranjeiro (2):
> doc: update mlx5 dependencies
> doc: add mlx5 release notes
>
> doc/guides/nics/mlx5.rst | 8 +-
> doc/guides/rel_notes/release_16_11.rst | 136
> ++---
>
The commit e13fbc065c7f ("scripts: improve quiet checkpatch")
removed the line "total: 1 errors, 0 warnings, 7 lines checked"
from the quiet report.
Later, commit e7c38f471384 ("scripts: remove useless checkpatch notes")
removed few lines before "total:.*lines checked", so it was not working
well
It is now possible to check a patch by providing an email
through stdin.
It is especially useful to automate checkpatch run when
receiving an email.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Monjalon
---
scripts/checkpatches.sh | 14 --
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git
Hi ,
Sorry, struggling to see what happened to this thread
I managed to get dpdk 2.2.0 to build on CentOs 6.8 by sorting the
MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT
But I'm trying to get 16.7 to run on 6.8, and am hitting the
vlan_tx_tag_present(_skb)
I tried just putting a bare
#define
On 11/2/2016 4:19 PM, martin_curran-gray at keysight.com wrote:
> Hi ,
>
> Sorry, struggling to see what happened to this thread
>
> I managed to get dpdk 2.2.0 to build on CentOs 6.8 by sorting the
> MSIX_ENTRY_CTRL_MASKBIT
>
> But I'm trying to get 16.7 to run on 6.8, and am hitting the
>
Hi,
I set
CONFIG_RTE_LIBRTE_KNI=n
In common_linux_app
Hmmm I didn't set
CONFIG_RTE_KNI_KMOD=n
It was a y
Lets see
Ah success
Thanks!
M.
-Original Message-
From: Ferruh Yigit [mailto:ferruh.yi...@intel.com]
Sent: 02 November 2016 16:31
To: CURRAN-GRAY,MARTIN (K-Scotland,ex1) ;
Hi Ananda,
Thank you for the patch. Can you please take care a few minor issues?
Patch tag should be: "net/e1000:", so patch title becomes:
"net/e1000: fix for forced speed/duplex config"
On 11/1/2016 10:47 PM, Ananda Sathyanarayana wrote:
> From the code, it looks like, hw->mac.autoneg,
Updated comments on API to clarify which parts of mbufs are
copied or changed by crypto operations.
Signed-off-by: Fiona Trahe
---
lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h | 19 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
diff --git a/lib/librte_cryptodev/rte_crypto_sym.h
Fixed the formating/syntax issues reported
>From the code, it looks like, hw->mac.autoneg, variable is used to
switch between calling either autoneg function or forcing
speed/duplex function. But this variable is not modified in
eth_em_start/eth_igb_start routines (it is always set to 1)
even
58 matches
Mail list logo
