request contribute permission

2018-02-24 Thread vino yang
Hi, I am an engineer working in Tencent bigdata department. I am interested in Apache edgent. I want to request contribute permission, Thanks.

Re: request contribute permission

2018-02-24 Thread vino yang
Hi Justin Mclean: You mean I do not need jira's "Assign" permission? Just sending discussions to mailing list, if the community accepts my idea, I could contribute my code then send my PR to apache/edgent repository? 2018-02-25 12:12 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > > Hi, I am an enginee

Re: request contribute permission

2018-02-24 Thread vino yang
Hi Justin Mclean: OK, I know. Thanks! 2018-02-25 13:10 GMT+08:00 Justin Mclean : > Hi, > > > You mean I do not need jira's "Assign" permission? > > No but if you need that we can give you that without being committer. > > > Just sending discussions > > to mailing list, if the community accepts

Can I Contribute a RabbitMQ connector?

2018-02-24 Thread vino yang
Hi : I find there is no one RabbitMQ connector for edgent. I want to contribute a RabbitMQ connector. How about this idea? Is there someone working for this? Thanks! vinoyang

Re: Can I Contribute a RabbitMQ connector?

2018-02-25 Thread vino yang
No one can give some comment? 2018-02-25 15:39 GMT+08:00 vino yang : > Hi : > I find there is no one RabbitMQ connector for edgent. I want to contribute > a RabbitMQ connector. How about this idea? Is there someone working for > this? > > Thanks! > vinoyang >

Re: Can I Contribute a RabbitMQ connector?

2018-02-25 Thread vino yang
ion. As long as the needed libraries have Apache compatible > licensees. > > Chris > > Outlook for Android<https://aka.ms/ghei36> herunterladen > > ____ > From: vino yang > Sent: Monday, February 26, 2018 4:36:23 AM > To: dev@edgent.ap

[discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-03 Thread vino yang
The reason is that Kafka 0.9+ provided a new consumer API which has more features and better performance. Just like Flink's implementation : https://github.com/apache/flink/tree/master/flink-connectors. vinoyang Thanks.

Re: Can I Contribute a RabbitMQ connector?

2018-03-04 Thread vino yang
ask Dale or someone who knows the inner workings a little more than > me to re-check and do the merge. > > Chris > > > > Am 26.02.18, 07:22 schrieb "vino yang" : > > Hi christofer.dutz: > > Thanks for your reply! I will do this task. > >

Re: Can I Contribute a RabbitMQ connector?

2018-03-10 Thread vino yang
Hi Christofer Dutz, Is there any progress about this issue? vino yang Thanks. 2018-03-05 9:33 GMT+08:00 vino yang : > Hi Christofer Dutz, > > That's all right. I think the RabbitMQ's licenses would not be a problem. > There are many open source systems and libraries whic

Re: Rename "iotp" to "iot-ibm" or similar?

2018-03-11 Thread vino yang
+1 , I think we also could support to EdgexFoundry in the future. 2018-03-11 20:00 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi all, > > I am currently thinking of adding modules to support other IoT Platforms: > > * Google IoT > * AWS IoT > * Siemens MindSphere > > For that the “iotp” sort of do

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-11 Thread vino yang
Hi guys, How about this idea, I think we should support kafka's new client API. 2018-03-04 15:10 GMT+08:00 vino yang : > The reason is that Kafka 0.9+ provided a new consumer API which has more > features and better performance. > > Just like Flink's implementation : htt

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-12 Thread vino yang
Zoo of adapters > for Kafka. > > Eventually a Kafka-Streams client would make sense though ... to sort of > extend the Edgent streams from the edge to the Kafka cluster. > > Chris > > > > Am 12.03.18, 03:41 schrieb "vino yang" : > > Hi guys, > >

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-12 Thread vino yang
Hi Chris, OK, Hope for listening someone's opinion. Vino yang. 2018-03-12 20:23 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi Vino, > > please don't interpret my opinion as some official project decision. > For discussions like this I would definitely prefer to hear the opinions >

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-12 Thread vino yang
ntain, test, > document etc. loads of separate modules. > > Chris > > > > Am 12.03.18, 13:30 schrieb "vino yang" : > > Hi Chris, > > OK, Hope for listening someone's opinion. > > Vino yang. > > 2018-03-12 20:23 GMT+08:00 Christo

[disscuss] make TStream support groupBy operator?

2018-03-12 Thread vino yang
Hi guys, Does Edgent current support groupBy operator? Vino yang Thanks.

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-13 Thread vino yang
Hi Chris, No objections about this approach. Good division of the work. I will provide the mapping of Kafka version and the specified feature later. Vino yang Thanks. 2018-03-13 20:11 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Well I have implemented something like the Version checking before, so I >

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-14 Thread vino yang
ol max records, introduced "max.poll.records" config item - 0.10.x -> 0.11.x : support producer exactly-once (with *beginTransaction*/*commitTransaction *API) - 0.11.x -> 1.x : seems no specific feature which affect the API Vino yang Thanks. 2018-03-14 9:27 GMT+08:00 v

Re: [disscuss] make TStream support groupBy operator?

2018-03-15 Thread vino yang
Hi all, Anyone can give some opinion? Chris ? I think we should support some reduce operation(aggregation function, such as max / avg / min sum) for both stream and windowed stream, these features based on the keyBy or groupBy operation. Vino yang Thanks! 2018-03-13 12:52 GMT+08:00 vino yang

Re: [disscuss] make TStream support groupBy operator?

2018-03-20 Thread vino yang
y are similar with each other in some ways. Vino yang. Thanks! 2018-03-20 17:05 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi Vino, > > unfortunately I can't contribute any opinion on this as I don't yet > understand the consequences. > I know that in an asynchronous event processing

Re: [disscuss] make TStream support groupBy operator?

2018-03-20 Thread vino yang
ion to the project now? Vino yang Thanks 2018-03-20 17:28 GMT+08:00 vino yang : > Hi Chris, > > My background is BigData (MapReduce, Spark, Flink, Kafka Stream) those > data processing frameworks all provide the groupBy / keyBy operation and > aggregation operator. It comes from traditi

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-03-20 Thread vino yang
Hi Chris, I will try to do this, if I have any question, keep in touch! Vino yang Thanks. 2018-03-20 17:32 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Ok, > > So I just added a new Annotation type to the Kafka module. > > org.apache.edgent.connectors.kafka.annotations.KafkaVersion > >

Re: Anyone else mis-interpret the "KafkaConsumer" and "KafkaProducer" all the time?

2018-03-20 Thread vino yang
,such as map, flatmap, filter, reduce... and so on. Vino yang. Thanks. 2018-03-20 20:51 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi, > > have been using the Kafka integration quite often in the past and one > thing I always have to explain when demonstrating code and which seems to > confuse

Re: Anyone else mis-interpret the "KafkaConsumer" and "KafkaProducer" all the time?

2018-03-22 Thread vino yang
Hi Dale, When I wroted the RabbitMQ connector I followed the Kafka Connector's style (and I also looked the MQTT connectors). And I chose the Kafka connector as the implementation template. The reason is the two classes (RabbitmqProducer and RabbitmqConsumer) should not share one rabbitmq's connec

Re: Anyone else mis-interpret the "KafkaConsumer" and "KafkaProducer" all the time?

2018-03-22 Thread vino yang
urce / sink or some other edgent self-created named all connectors should follow this specification. Vino yang Thanks. 2018-03-23 0:56 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi Dale, > > Happy to read from you :-) > > It was just something I had to explain every time I showed the code for

Re: My Edgent and PLC4X Article on the Cover-Page

2018-03-23 Thread vino yang
Hi Chris, You did a great job! It's good for expanding the edgent's influence! Vino yang Thanks. 2018-03-23 17:57 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi, > > today I bought the magazine with my Article and was totally amazed that it > has become one of the cover-page arti

Re: Anyone else mis-interpret the "KafkaConsumer" and "KafkaProducer" all the time?

2018-03-26 Thread vino yang
the scenario there is only one connection) . So I think we should take it easy about the case you described. Vino yang. Thanks. 2018-03-27 4:27 GMT+08:00 Dale LaBossiere : > Hi Vino, thanks for the clarification. > > One last question :-). Is there ever a situation when it’s > desira

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-04-04 Thread vino yang
Hi Chris, I have not done this. And I would upgrade it soon. Vino yang Thanks! 2018-04-04 19:23 GMT+08:00 Christofer Dutz : > Hi, > > so I updated the libs locally, built and re-ran the example with this > version and it now worked without any problems. > > Chris > >

Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-04-04 Thread vino yang
Hi Chris, I rechecked the old mails between you and me. I misunderstand your message. I thought you will create the annotation. In fact, you have created the annotation. I will do this work soon, hold on. Vino yang. Thanks. 2018-04-04 19:32 GMT+08:00 vino yang : > Hi Chris, > > I

Re: Re: [discuss] What about splitting the kafka Connector into kafka 0.8 and 0.9?

2018-04-04 Thread Vino yang
Hi Chris, Take it easy, I think the compile failure may not affect a lot. I am glad to hear that higher Kafka client can be backward compatible well. Vino yang Thanks. On 2018-04-04 23:21 , Christofer Dutz Wrote: Hi Vino, Yeah ... but I did it without an ASF header ... that's why the