Re: Question about used third-party dependencies

ndicating the licenses of dependencies. After coming up with this I attempted to describe it clearly on legal-discuss and didn't get any negative feedback so I think it's in line with apache policy. thanks david jencks Cheers -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://www.qi4j.org

Re: [VOTE] release version 1.2.0 of the Felix parent pom

-1 (non binding) maven is working on releasing an apache pom 6 that includes the recommended release profile. I'd wait a couple days for that. Also I'm not sure why there are zips and tars, I'd expect only the pom to be released. thanks david jencks On Apr 22, 2009, at 1

URL decoding in framework BundleArchive

ences. -location = URLDecoder.decode(location); +location = URLDecoder.decode(location, "UTF-8"); // Make sure the referenced file exists. File file = new File(location.substring(FILE_PROTOCOL.length())); thanks david jencks

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.4.0

legal files in root and src to be confusing. Why not just use the standard source distro from the apache 7 pom apache-release profile? I'd advise fixing these problems and re-rolling the release. thanks david jencks On Feb 19, 2010, at 12:39 AM, Chris Custine wrote: The Karaf

Re: [jira] Resolved: (FELIX-1990) Use aries blueprint / jmx

This is really great, but could someone push a snapshot? Geronimo is using this and it would be very handy to have it available. thanks david jencks On Feb 20, 2010, at 12:26 PM, Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) wrote: [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1990?page

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.4.0

something other than the defaults from the apache 7 pom? (not that karaf is) thanks david jencks Some artifacts are still using the osgi jars from felix (they should switch to use the official org.osgi artifacts as soon as possible). regards, Karl On Wed, Feb 24, 2010 at 7:57 PM, Chris Custin

Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.4.0

svn export. One of my main criteria for voting +1 on release candidates lately has been checking that these source bundles build. thanks david jencks regards, Karl thanks david jencks Some artifacts are still using the osgi jars from felix (they should switch to use the officia

Re: Cancelled: Re: [VOTE] Release Karaf 1.4.0

stuff that isn't included especially when I've found a different implementation to substitute. thanks david jencks On Mar 1, 2010, at 2:08 PM, Chris Custine wrote: This vote is cancelled to clean up more license and source header issues. Thanks everyone for your patience. Chris

Is there any way to get a more up to date maven-bundle-plugin?

maven plugin? thanks david jencks

Re: Is there any way to get a more up to date maven-bundle-plugin?

would be pretty handy to have this applied. thanks david jencks On Mar 4, 2010, at 7:49 PM, Chris Custine wrote: Hi David, I haven't tried this lately, but you could try bootstrapping in a specific version of bnd as Stuart points out in this Jira issue: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows

Re: Framework trunk

It would be really great if someone could apply FELIX-2195 so geronimo developers who use macs can also try this out. thanks david jencks On Mar 22, 2010, at 11:30 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote: On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 4:30 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote: On 3/9/10 10:26, Richard S. Hall wrote

Resolver problem?

at org.apache.felix.framework.BundleImpl.start(BundleImpl.java:905) at org.apache.geronimo.system.configuration.DependencyManager.starting(DependencyManager.java:198) Doesn't seem quite right.... thanks david jencks

Why does karaf start jaas boot when it's in the boot classpath?

The jaas boot code only works if its loaded in the system classloader, and it is there, so why is this in startup.properties? org/apache/felix/karaf/jaas/org.apache.felix.karaf.jaas.boot/${felix.karaf.version}/org.apache.felix.karaf.jaas.boot-${felix.karaf.version}.jar=30 thanks david jencks

Re: Preparation of Karaf release

ou be interested in this capability for this karaf release? thanks david jencks On Apr 29, 2010, at 11:50 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I've been staging a bunch of releases in preparation of the karaf release. > If there are any karaf pending issues that should be applied before the > r

Re: Preparation of Karaf release

o with the endorsed dir, so geronimo has always supported both. david jencks > > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 21:29, David Jencks wrote: > >> Please apply patch attached to and the patch in the comment for FELIX-2270. >> >> In geronimo I've modified the st

Tools to determine correct package version?

it obvious when you have unintentionally changed compatibility. thanks david jencks

Re: Tools to determine correct package version?

ought done at the very end. The > decision should be made during development by the developer who knows > about the changes he or she is making... For semantic concerns, yes but having some syntactic checking and suggestions would be pretty useful. thanks david jencks > > Best regards,

Re: Tools to determine correct package version?

an then be versioned independently 2. Refine ones understanding of package versions for implementors so that major version bump means "we took some methods/interfaces out" and minor version means "we added some new methods" which seems to be what Peter's version policies imply. (2) seems more reasonable to me, but I'm at the point where I need a bunch of simple concrete examples I can look at to believe anything in this area. thanks david jencks > > Best regards, > > David

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

I'd like to be a part of this TLP. many thanks david jencks On May 27, 2010, at 10:40 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > It seems there is a consensus to move Karaf as a TLP, at least amongst > people involved in Karaf (the other felix committers haven't really > expressed any opi

Re: [DISCUSS] Move Karaf as a TLP

e it (rather than some other osgi framework) ServiceMix and Geronimo which I think of as servers are built on karaf. "Server applications" sort of implies to me that you need an additional server to run them on. thanks david jencks > > > On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 17:26, Charles

Re: [VOTE] Propose Karaf as a TLP

+1 david jencks On Jun 2, 2010, at 11:24 PM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I think it's time start a vote about moving Karaf as a TLP as we > recently discussed. > The vote is about submitting the following proposal to the next board meeting: > > [ ] +1 send this proposal to t

Re: Proposed Resolution: Establish Apache Karaf as a TLP

ried a lot of variations and this is really the best we could come up with, and to me it's quite specific and accurate. david jencks > > Roy >

Re: Proposed Resolution: Establish Apache Karaf as a TLP

On Jun 8, 2010, at 6:17 AM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 6/7/10 18:12, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >> On Jun 7, 2010, at 1:22 PM, David Jencks wrote: >> >>> On Jun 7, 2010, at 12:52 PM, Roy T. Fielding wrote: >>> >>> >>>> Hi Richard, &g

Re: NOTICE/DEPENDENCIES files for Felix subproject releases

maven dependencies will be the actual providers of the required imports, a strong case could be made that felix should simply not include DEPENDENCIES files. thanks david jencks On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:30 PM, Richard S. Hall wrote: > On 6/9/10 14:52, Justin Edelson wrote: >> Richard- &

Re: [VOTE] Release FileInstall 3.2.0

: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARIES-757 I ran mvn clean asv:check -DoldArtifact=org.apache.felix:org.apache.felix.fileinstall:3.1.10 on the project bundle. thanks david jencks On Mar 19, 2012, at 7:07 AM, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > Hi, > > Given the number of improvements, I&

SCR concurrency issues (cf FELIX-3456)

factories. Comments and more scenarios to consider are more than welcome. thanks david jencks

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Web Console 3.4.0

says "if there's a notice file included" I'd certainly be more comfortable rerolling with a more appropriate NOTICE file. DEPS is legally meaningless and a bad idea I apologize for david jencks On Apr 25, 2012, at 2:16 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, >

Re: SCR concurrency issues (cf FELIX-3456)

regis- ter the component configuration as a service in the service registry and then activate the component configuration. thanks david jencks On Apr 19, 2012, at 3:19 PM, David Jencks wrote: > We've run into one definite concurrency problem in SCR and I've been > discussing offline wit

Re: SCR concurrency issues (cf FELIX-3456)

On Apr 27, 2012, at 4:23 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 20.04.2012 um 00:19 schrieb David Jencks: > >> We've run into one definite concurrency problem in SCR and I've been >> discussing offline with a colleague how to fix it and wanted to get

Another SCR spec question

everyone thinks this is a bad requirement, what has been done to fix the spec? thanks david jencks

Re: SCR concurrency issues (cf FELIX-3456)

On Apr 27, 2012, at 3:55 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 26.04.2012 um 02:33 schrieb David Jencks: > >> A lot of our confusion thinking about how to fix this is caused by the >> 2-step state changes in felix ds, such as the "activating" state. It s

Moving scr to java 6?

we could either keep a branch alive or see if retrotranslator still works. Thoughts? thanks david jencks

Re: Moving scr to java 6?

On May 4, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Valentin Valchev wrote: > On 4.5.2012 г. 20:11 ч., David Jencks wrote: >> I'd like to suggest moving scr trunk to java 6. I realize there are people >> still using various jdk 1.3 with scr butI think it is getting less and less >> plaus

Nudge on FELIX-3377 (SCR activate/modify/deactivate methods can change the service registration properties)

a lot of merge conflicts in svn. many thanks! david jencks

DS patches

ption reluctant and greedy options with some tests. I hope this is not controversial :-) https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3456 now has some -5 patches that I think are an OK solution to the concurrency problems. Thanks! david jencks

is the 4.3 compendium jar publically available?

The 4.3 compendium spec was made public may 8 but I can't tell if the jar with eg. the new SCR annotations is also public I certainly can't find it in maven central. Anyone have an idea? thanks david jencks

Can maven-bundle-plugin use *.bnd files?

I thought I remembered seeing some project that used the maven-bundle-plugin but put the instructions in a *.bnd file, but when I've experimented I can't get it to work. Anyone know if this is possible, how to do it, or if not, anyone else think it would be a good idea? thanks david jencks

DS 1.2 annotations

m? I'd guess no I do think we should check how well the bnd support works through maven. thanks david jencks

Re: Can maven-bundle-plugin use *.bnd files?

of the xml-style instructions explained here with the _include instruction like this: <_include>osgi.bnd I don't think its entirely obvious that this particular instruction works as well here as in a .bnd file :-) thanks david jencks On May 16, 2012, at 4:57 PM, Stuart McCulloch wr

Re: Can maven-bundle-plugin use *.bnd files?

yes I'm suggesting documentation for this particular directive would be useful along with the other specifically documented directives like Export-Package which are also explained in more detail in the bnd documentation. thanks david jencks On May 17, 2012, at 11:53 AM, Felix Meschb

Re: [jira] [Updated] (FELIX-3490) Notice included OSGi classes

you are going to use for this? thanks david jencks On Jun 1, 2012, at 5:57 AM, Felix Meschberger (JIRA) wrote: > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3490?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel > ] > >

More DS concurrency problems

nd recreate the instances. I also have a few cleanup changes such as better javadoc and removing stray references to no-longer-present *ing transient states that I don't think will be controversial so I plan to just commit them. thanks david jencks

Re: More DS concurrency problems

or a given component, several service registrations and several service instances may briefly be present. However the extra ones should disappear quickly as the thread involved discovers it didn't "win". This is similar to the situation in the 2-locks scenario in (1) above. t

[DS] [lifecycle methods returning service properties] How should this work?

for a key means "remove the key". Have I missed an easy way to use the current implementation? thanks david jencks

Re: [DS] [lifecycle methods returning service properties] How should this work?

On Jun 4, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 04.06.2012 um 19:16 schrieb David Jencks: > >> cf FELIX-3506, 3377. >> >> Right now we have it set up so that a lifecycle method can return the exact >> set of service properties it wa

Re: More DS concurrency problems

On Jun 4, 2012, at 10:45 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Smaller things first ... good idea :-) > Will you create issues for them ? > > Am 03.06.2012 um 20:21 schrieb David Jencks: > >> In other DS issues: >> >> I'd like to separate

Re: [jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3535) Minor DS cleanup fixes

release since then. Why would we increment the version again since there hasn't been a release? Maybe I don't understand felix policies? Also IIUC the released bundle version and maven version are going to be 1.8 (skipping odd numbers), is the export

Re: Some failures in SCR integration tests

I'd appreciate an issue. I've been working mostly on a somewhat modified tree locally but have not seen this problem. What jdk are you on? I wonder if this is due to the changes in the latest jdks that break a lot of stuff like the aries proxy code. thanks david jencks On Jun 15

[DS] Which comes first, registration or instance creation?

u disable and re-enable A. I'd like to get the spec clarified on what should happen with circular references (see https://www.osgi.org/members/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2410) but think for the order of registration and instance creation we should either follow the spec or get it changed. Thoughts? Comments? many thanks david jencks

Re: [jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3597) Hard to debug fileinstall because shaded classes lack source in -sources.jar

. Since no packages were harmed/changed I don't think terming this shading is appropriate. david jencks On Jul 16, 2012, at 11:00 AM, Guillaume Nodet (JIRA) wrote: > >[ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3597?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:co

Re: status of SCR in trunk?

es between 1.1 and 1.2 but I think the 1.2 classes are compiled with a java 5 class format which won't work on pre java 5 vms. But we have to export the version at 1.2 if that's what we're implementing. So is this the end of supporting earlier vms? I'm not an expert on this

Re: [VOTE] Accept the UserAdmin donation by Jan Willem Janssen

+1 (I think non-binding) david jencks On Aug 3, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Marcel Offermans wrote: > A little while ago, Jan Willem Janssen donated a complete implementation of > the UserAdmin compendium service [1] to our project. I would like to start a > formal vote on accepting

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

at ought to log appropriate info when this occurs, so since this has shown up "in the wild" I'm very tempted to commit the improved code and the (probably temporary) extra logging. Any objections? thanks david jencks On Aug 9, 2012, at 8:46 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi everyo

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

lock problem to see if the logging code works The timeout should definitely be configurable, I'll try to get to that soon. Let me know if this causes problems!!! thanks david jencks On Aug 9, 2012, at 10:27 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi David; > > It's also my case

Re: [DS] State of the bundle and ready for a release ?

l the DS 1.2 and proposed 1.3 features. Are you aware of any DS 1.2 features we haven't implemented yet? I have not yet figured out how to run the CTS, the packaging seems to have changed a bit since the instructions were written. thanks! david jencks On Aug 29, 2012, at 8:21 PM, Feli

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

Excellent! I've been working on my idea how to fix this, but I'm still at the stage of getting the existing integration tests to pass. At least some stuff works :-) Looking forward to trying out your test case... david jencks On Sep 2, 2012, at 6:58 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: &g

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

e might be able to move the rest of the state out and share the dependency managers among all the component managers for the same component. This might be better post 1.8 however. Please try out the changes and let me know if you find more problems! thanks david jencks On Sep 2, 2012, at 11:02

Re: [DS] State of the bundle and ready for a release ?

Assuming we don't find more problems from or objections to my concurrency fixes in the next couple days, I think I'm OK with releasing now. especially if you can check that the CTS still passes :-) thanks! david jencks On Sep 2, 2012, at 9:21 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: >

Re: [jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3645) SCR could not obtain lock in 5000 ms

As noted in the issue i can't find where the DS 1.0 or 1.2 spec describes this behavior. It looks to me like the specs say if a bind method is specified but missing, you just don't call it. (after logging that it's missing). Anyway I'll look into restoring the behavior

Re: [jira] [Commented] (FELIX-3645) SCR could not obtain lock in 5000 ms

ional. In either case the component isn't getting info it expects. And in all cases the component can get the dependency using the lookup strategy. we'll see what happens with arguing with the experts ;-) thanks! david jencks On Sep 5, 2012, at 4:17 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

Looking forward to any review :-) I've found an additional problem with ServiceFactory components that I'm trying to fix.... david jencks On Sep 6, 2012, at 2:54 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi David, > > I'm happy to see that the test helped, and it seems that fixing

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

Hi Pierre. so many problems :-) These are 2 unrelated problems, to each other and to the problem I found. I sure wonder why we didn't see these before thanks david jencks On Sep 6, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi David, > > I don't know if it's re

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

rther. thanks! david jencks On Sep 6, 2012, at 1:22 PM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi David, > > I don't know if it's related to the problem you are talking about, but I > just noticed a problem which might also be related to ServiceFactory. > > here it is: > &g

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

h to FELIX-3659 will know more in the morning. thanks! david jencks On Sep 7, 2012, at 12:18 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi David, > > no problems, don't worry , I'm using the current released scr version in > production, and I'm just doing some extensive non-regre

[DS] Sharing method objects

://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3659. This is a moderately big change although pretty straightforward so I started by attaching a patch in case anyone wants to look first. If I don't see problems here with our project and no one objects I will probably commit it tomorrow. thanks! david jencks

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

Yes, the illegal state exception was pretty dumb. fixed. Not sure why I didn't see it thanks! david jencks On Sep 7, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > I just updated the trunk, and ran a mvn test, and indeed, found an lllegal > state exception: > (notice the

Re: NullPointerException in SCR DependencyManager.getBoundServiceReferences() method.

should be fixed... david jencks On Sep 11, 2012, at 2:37 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi, > > I'm testin the SCR from trunk, in order to validate the > FELIX-3645<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-3645>issue, and > I came across the following > exceptio

Re: SCR could not obtain state lock after 5 seconds

cant wait :-) thanks david jencks On Sep 11, 2012, at 5:37 AM, Pierre De Rop wrote: > Hi David, > > So, I have finished to run our non regression tests and the locking problem > seems to be resolved, but sorry, because now it seems that I'm getting > other kind of problems

Re: Dynamically referencing a Service using Felix annotations

d/unbind methods taking a ServiceReference which will give you the properties you need to decide which one you want, and you can use componentContext.locateService( "CheckReference", ref ) to get the actual service. david jencks On Sep 25, 2012, at 10:44 PM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote

Re: Dynamically referencing a Service using Felix annotations

ns a local copy of > search results for subsequent calls for those service references.? In trunk, at the moment, the first time you use locateService it will fetch the service object and cache it. I think the released code does this too but I'm less sure. thanks david jencks > > regards > Chetan

Re: Bundle to simplify JAAS usage in OSGi

I haven't looked at your proposed code yet but from your description it sounds like you have nice solutions for all the problems I'm aware of working around the JAAS apis :-) thanks! david jencks On Sep 28, 2012, at 1:42 AM, Chetan Mehrotra wrote: >> I would be interested

[DS] Feedback wanted on some ideas

dependencies + instances in a single state object, but this is a different approach to the current state objects which have no internal state. thanks david jencks

Re: [DS] Feedback wanted on some ideas

As of DS 1.1, the component name is only unique per bundle. So I'm not sure how this would work, wouldn't you need to include the bundle in the method signature? david jencks On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:39 AM, Andrei Pozolotin wrote: > great ideas; one more for your conside

Re: [DS] Feedback wanted on some ideas

ges in how configurationPIDs might be sharable, but I thought previously the first bundle to consume a configurationPID got to use it exclusively. Also in DS 1.2 you can specify the configurationPID separately from the component name. david jencks On Oct 3, 2012, at 11:31 AM, Andrei Pozolotin w

Re: [DS] Feedback wanted on some ideas

Any comments on these ideas? Should I take silence as agreement :-) ? thanks david jencks On Oct 3, 2012, at 10:28 AM, David Jencks wrote: > I've had several ideas about DS enhancements, some of which I've implemented, > and would like some feedback about how desirable

Re: Declarative Service: "Activate" Method

will find it difficult to maintain this order in a working system. david jencks On Oct 8, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Marcel Schlegel wrote: > Hi, > > I have a short question realating to the "Activate" method of a > ComponentClass: > Is it possible to call always at first

Re: [DS] Feedback wanted on some ideas

On Oct 5, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi, > > Am 03.10.2012 um 19:28 schrieb David Jencks: > >> I've had several ideas about DS enhancements, some of which I've >> implemented, and would like some feedback about how desirable they are >&

[DS] changing to java 5

th trunk (which didn't work on pre-5 vms for a couple months). If this is really a problem not best solved with a separate retrotranslated jar we can change it back later. thanks david jencks

Re: [DS] Current trunk of scr project requires non-central artifact

this is odd, we switched to using the servicemix junit wrapper some time ago will look into it. david jencks On Oct 18, 2012, at 2:50 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all > > The scr project currently does not build successfully due to requiring one or > more artifacts n

Re: [DS] Current trunk of scr project requires non-central artifact

Fixed, FELIX-3725, r1399981, and see http://team.ops4j.org/wiki/display/paxexam/JUnit+Driver we needed a newer pax-exam. david jencks On Oct 18, 2012, at 6:29 PM, David Jencks wrote: > this is odd, we switched to using the servicemix junit wrapper some time > ago will look i

Re: [DS] How about an SCR 1.6.2 release ?

k and change them to 1.6.2? I have not been maintaining the changelog that will be a bit of work. If I don't discover any giant problems before we get the above done I'm fine with a release. thanks david jencks On Oct 31, 2012, at 3:05 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi all, >

Re: [DS] How about an SCR 1.6.2 release ?

I updated the changelog from the svn log hopefully I didn't miss anything. waiting for advice on the other two questions thanks david jencks On Oct 31, 2012, at 8:44 AM, David Jencks wrote: > At the moment the code uses some java 5. How important is it that this > release

Re: [DS] How about an SCR 1.6.2 release ?

basic housekeeping like removing the pre-java-5 concurrency compatibility code. I have no strong feeling about releasing with or without this stuff. thanks! david jencks On Oct 31, 2012, at 12:32 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi > > Am 31.10.2012 um 19:54 schrieb David Jencks: >

Re: [DS] How about an SCR 1.6.2 release ?

Since I haven't seen any requests for pre-java-5 support I may spend a couple minutes tomorrow cleaning up the pom and possibly removing the dependency on backport-util-concurrent. thanks david jencks On Nov 1, 2012, at 1:10 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi > > Am 31.10

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Felix Declarative Services 1.6.2

+1 (non binding) david jencks On Nov 7, 2012, at 3:53 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi > > Here is the Apache Felix Declarative Services 1.6.2 release implementing the > most recent Declarative Services Specification Version 1.2. > > Please note, that this is the first J

[DS} major refactoring of dependency management

in case the osgi code changes, but I could easily be talked into removing the stuff we don't use. thanks david jencks

Re: SCR compilation problem in the trunk ?

It's a mistake. It's long gone in my github branch. I blame autocompletion :-). I'd prefer to just let my branch fix it when I commit, but if you want to fix it now I don't think it would cause any serious merge problems. thanks david jencks On Dec 17, 2012, at 9:19 AM,

[DS] Proposal to expose the functionality of ScrCommand as a service

to get this in in the next few days. many thanks david jencks

Race condition in DS configuring new components

k for events to determine whether there's a factoryPID or just PID and use that to decide. Thoughts? Any other ideas? many thanks david jencks

Re: Race condition in DS configuring new components

es between initial configuration and any "later" events. But this solution is definitely more complicated. many thanks! david jencks On Feb 24, 2013, at 5:37 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi David, > > Am 23.02.2013 um 23:42 schrieb David Jencks: > >> There's a

Re: Race condition in DS configuring new components

k in general in R5 because of targetPids. I'm going to look at implementing support for these and the location changed event. thanks david jencks On Feb 24, 2013, at 11:00 AM, David Jencks wrote: > Hi Felix, > > (1) I'll think about whether there's a way to use

{config admin] Changing a ManagedService[Factory] pids

ng at the code. thanks! david jencks

Re: BndTools and DS 1.2 Annotations

I think you could reuse most of the bnd infrastructure for ds annotations/bnd-file-instruction-processing, but I share Neil's hope that all but the DS 1.2 annotations die out. david jencks On Mar 16, 2013, at 8:39 AM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi > > How complex would it

[DS] configuring factory components with config admin

illy if the component is registered as a service. many thanks david jencks

Config Admin problem and working around it or fixing it

27;ve implemented (1) but I'm not very happy about how the code looks. thoughts? thanks david jencks

[DS] possible bug somewhere….

I have access to the osgi tck outside of apache and think I might have found a bug in the 5 enterprise DS tck. Does apache have it's osgi tck access back? Is there anyone here I can discuss this with? Would discussions have to take place off-list? thanks david jencks

Re: Config Admin problem and working around it or fixing it

with releasing several maintenance ca's? thanks david jencks On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:32 PM, Felix Meschberger wrote: > Hi > > If the trunk build fixes your problem, we should just relase configadmin. > WDYT ? > > Regards > Felix > > Am 07.04.2013 um 14:29 sc

[DS] Likely mistake in response to a service being unavailable

rvice reference is that it was being deactivated and unregistered, then a service event will be along soon to deactivate the component we are talking about. There's no need to guess at the cause of the missing service. thoughts? many thanks david jencks

[DS] recent work

e logic should apply to immediate components. thanks david jencks

Re: [SCR Tooling] Discontinuing support for some features

class was semantically versioned. Maybe I'm not sure what "break" means. Since this is compile time annotation processing you'll get the result you compile with not what you run with, which seems kinda like what you'd expect. I don't see a lot of value in the one-large-xm

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >