Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

Alex, fyi if you are checking the refleciton stuff out, you should find trace(typeDefInstance.toString(true)); to be quite helpful. This gives a full representation of the reflected content. On Tue, Sep 27, 2016 at 7:57 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > I have gotten half of it

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

I have gotten half of it in. :) I pushed the compiler updates. I had some problem with pushing to asjs repo to get the framework updates/manualtests update. I will figure this out later this evening my time. cheers Greg On Wed, Sep 21, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > >

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

OK, looking forward to seeing it. -Alex On 9/13/16, 10:58 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote: >Alex, just a quick update on this >I didn't get to work on this as much over the weekend as I'd hoped, but I >have progressed it since. I iterated through a few different approaches >for

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

Alex, just a quick update on this I didn't get to work on this as much over the weekend as I'd hoped, but I have progressed it since. I iterated through a few different approaches for various aspects of the reflection stuff, but I have settled on what I think is a good output type for js,

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

Good to know. Pretty sure there is nothing outside of reflection here, so that sounds great.- thanks On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:59 PM, Alex Harui wrote: > > > On 9/8/16, 9:50 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote: > > >What is your preference for me getting this into the

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

On 9/8/16, 9:50 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote: >What is your preference for me getting this into the repo? If all current >(updated) tests pass and nothing else seems broken is it ok if I push to >develop for jx and asjs? Or do you prefer I go to branches on both until >it >can be

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

I've just followed your lead here, you had done a lot of the initial work already, so I didn't have to figure out the 'how to do' part, just bits of the 'what to do'. So far I have added optional caching (TypeDefinition.useCache), but it is currently not on by default (I haven't actually gotten to

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

On 9/8/16, 5:39 PM, "Greg Dove" wrote: >"Alex if you have a different view of how this should work, please let me >know." > >Sorry I have been to long in the compiler. I see what is needed in the >framework code now. I will just use what is there. :) > Sounds good. There

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

"Alex if you have a different view of how this should work, please let me know." Sorry I have been to long in the compiler. I see what is needed in the framework code now. I will just use what is there. :) On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > Actually I

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

Actually I think the safest thing to do here would be to output the immediate base class, I *think* that should always work correctly. And that is all I need to follow the inheritance chain and collect the inherited members for the higher level TypeDefinition. Alex if you have a different view of

Re: [FlexJS][Falcon-JX] Reflection related question

Never mind, I think I don't need to do this output. It looks like I can simply use constructor.superClass in js and go recursive. Please ignore. On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Greg Dove wrote: > Alex this might be a question more for you, unless others are familiar >