Re: Plan Creator for Web Apps - Implementation Complete!

On Jan 9, 2008 11:14 PM, Hernan Cunico [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It is far from complete but pls send your input. I like it very much. It reads fine. I've added a screenshot of the puppy. Jacek -- Jacek Laskowski http://www.JacekLaskowski.pl

Re: svn commit: r610463 - /geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk/plugins/org.apache.geronimo.runtime.v20/META-INF/MANIFEST.MF

On Jan 9, 2008 6:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: mcconne Date: Wed Jan 9 09:08:34 2008 New Revision: 610463 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=610463view=rev Log: Point to Geronimo version 2.0.2 libraries Modified:

Re: Shouldn't subprojects use their file system parents as maven parents?

On Jan 10, 2008, at 11:33 PM, Jacek Laskowski wrote: On Jan 11, 2008 7:12 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After the reorganization into plugins most everything still has its old pom parent, either o.a.g.modules/modules or o.a.g.plugins/ plugins. This seems to me like a bad idea.

Re: Shouldn't subprojects use their file system parents as maven parents?

On Jan 11, 2008 9:27 AM, David Jencks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess we'd have to ask a maven expert for a real answer, I just have a feeling it will lead to trouble, but... ... The relativePath is just wrong. If we were to make it accurate it would be parent

RE: TSSConfigEditorTest requires SSL?

Jarek, Yes, it hangs. It seems the client part does something wrong and stops, while the server part waits for the connection for some time and then (after a while) throws the exception mentioned. Vasily -Original Message- From: Jarek Gawor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday,

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 611098

OpenEJB trunk at 61 Geronimo Revision: 611098 built with tests included See the full build-0300.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080111/build-0300.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080111 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL

Re: Shouldn't subprojects use their file system parents as maven parents?

IIRC and [1], the relative path is used if the parent artifact is not already in the local repository. So a build from the subproject directory would complain. It is a good idea to fix the relative paths. The relativePaths will break if someone insists on checking out part of the server and

[BUILD] 2.1: Failed for Revision: 611180

OpenEJB trunk at 61 Geronimo Revision: 611180 built with tests included See the full build-0900.log file at http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080111/build-0900.log Download the binaries from http://people.apache.org/~prasad/binaries/trunk/20080111 [INFO] BUILD SUCCESSFUL

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager-2.1

+1 Jay David Blevins wrote: Discuss thread (for reference): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Changes since last release: r585608 | dain | 2007-10-17 10:56:54

Re: [DISCUSS] Time to move AsyncHttpClient out of Sandbox

Note that this is cross-posted to geronimo dev and mina dev lists... Hopefully the last one... Alex and Trustin, Thanks for the info... More below... On Jan 9, 2008, at 6:16 PM, Trustin Lee wrote: Well, I think it's OK for the Geronimo team to fork AHC, and I'd like to respect them if Jeff

Integrating Jetspeed with Geronimo

The work on integrating Jetspeed with Geronimo is currently in the sandbox. http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/sandbox/jetspeed-integration/ This is what the following modules do. jetspeed-base: - This module installs 5 common jetspeed jars into the G repository.

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager-2.1

+1 source and jars all look good. David's idea to OSGI'ify is a good idea. Something for the next release... --kevan On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:35 AM, David Blevins wrote: Discuss thread (for reference): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Proposed plugin and clustering code/module rearrangement

On 11/01/2008, at 7:15 AM, David Jencks wrote: Could you update us on your guess for a time frame for the SFSB clustering? Will this require OpenEJB changes? Is it realistic to get this into 2.1? Hello David, I still target to complete SFSB clustering over the week-end. If this is not

[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-3732) Separate plugin management into new jar, car, and management plugins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12558177#action_12558177 ] David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-3732: Rev 611338 moves the rest of the

[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-3732) Separate plugin management into new jar, car, and management plugins

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-3732?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] David Jencks closed GERONIMO-3732. -- Resolution: Fixed Rev 611348. Fix up resource bundles. There's one untranslated string

[VOTE] Release XBean 3.3

Binaries: http://people.apache.org/~dblevins/stage-xbean/org/apache/xbean/ SVN Tag: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.3/ Happy voting! -David

Could not scan module for TLD files: Filename too long

Hi, is anyone else getting this error when building trunk on Windows ?? And what if anything can be done to get past the problem ?? It's not obvious to me which file it is complaining about. [INFO] [INFO]

Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-txmanager-2.1

+1 On Jan 10, 2008, at 5:35 AM, David Blevins wrote: Discuss thread (for reference): http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/geronimo-dev/200711.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Changes since last release: r585608 | dain

Re: Board Report Due in January

Just a few short days left. Please take a few minutes and update the Wiki. I'll take what we have on Monday at 0800 ET and submit it for our report for January. On Dec 31, 2007, at 8:45 PM, Matt Hogstrom wrote: Its that time again. I have created the template and would ask everyone