sitions
correspond to?
Short doc:
nit: Design Constraints, code should: Have AM logic isolated from the
persistent storage of state.
// I think this should be "abstracted" so we can plug in different
implementations of persistent storage of state.
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
we ensure that RS is dead we don't reassign.
My document implies (but doesn't elaborate, I'll fix that) that master does
direct Opened->Closed direct transition only when that is true.
A state called "MaybeOpened" could be added. Let me add it...
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
Responses inline. I'm going to wait for next doc before I ask more
questions about the master5 specifics. :)
I suggest we start a thread about the hang/double assign/fencing scenario.
Jon.
On Sat, Oct 19, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> Here's sergey's replies
ry and could still use features like
> > >> git-bisect.
> > >> > The result of that is at [2].
> > >> >
> > >> > Joe Stein also sent us Kafka's use of Git that was helpful when
> > writing
> > >> > down how users should contribute patches. [3]
> > >> >
> > >> > I hope all this helps! Despite the pain we went through in getting
> > this
> > >> all
> > >> > set up (dealing with coordination of INFRA to lock the SVN repos,
> > >> transfer
> > >> > to Git, verify accuracy, and people who then didn't know how to use
> > >> Git), I
> > >> > think everyone is happy we did it.
> > >> >
> > >> > - Josh
> > >> >
> > >> > [1] https://issues.apache.org/**jira/browse/INFRA-6392<
> > >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-6392>
> > >> > [2] http://accumulo.apache.org/**git.html<
> > >> > http://accumulo.apache.org/git.html>
> > >> > [3]
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/**confluence/display/KAFKA/Git+**Workflow<
> > >> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/KAFKA/Git+Workflow>
> > >> > [4] https://git-wip-us.apache.org/
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> ---
> > >> Jesse Yates
> > >> @jesse_yates
> > >> jyates.github.com
> > >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best Regards,
> > Haosdent Huang
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
l me what these jars are used for in HBase 0.96?
> > If I remove them from lib dir, will it cause problems?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Jerry
> >
> > gmbal-api-only-3.0.0-b023.jar
> > grizzly-framework-2.1.1.jar
> > grizzly-framework-2.1.1-tests.jar
>
ream
> > (using Writables#write), and invoke sync/hflush.
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hadoop-common/blob/trunk/hadoop-common-project/hadoop-common/src/main/java/org/apache/hadoop/io/SequenceFile.java#L1314
> >
> > Is there a reason we have this call here? Please let me know if I miss
> any
> > context.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Himanshu
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
R_SEEK hook can be activated at the end of ctor of StoreScanner
> wrapper created in #2
> The custom ChangedReadersObserver would activate the COMPACT_COMPLETE hook.
>
> Comments are welcome.
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
won't
> need fault injection framework for commit tests.*
>
>
+1. bolding mine.
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
> > wrapper created in #2
> > The custom ChangedReadersObserver would activate the COMPACT_COMPLETE
> hook.
> >
> > Comments are welcome.
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
toBytes("cf");
+
bq. Can you add enough info so that we don't need to consult the jira to
> figure out what the unit test is testing?
>
> Sure. I will add comments to the new test.
>
Looking forwards to it.
> Cheers
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 11:06 AM,
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:34 PM, Ted Yu wrote:
> bq. The lastest submitted trunk patch
>
> The proposal here wouldn't use minicluster.
>
> Great!
> Cheers
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 1:13 PM,
10070
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
hfds affinity group/favored nodes.
So the shadow memstore for region X would flush the hfile to A,B,C and
region Y to A,D,E. Then the read replicas would be promoted (close
secondary, open as primary) based on where the regions/hfiles's affinity
group. This feels likes an optimization done one the 2rd or 3rd rev.
Jon
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
ng sure the proposed design have a path for optimal
fast-consistent read-recovery.
Jon.
On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 9:54 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> HBASE-10070 [1] looks to be heading into a discussion more apt for the
> mailing list than in the jira. Moving this to the dev list for threaded
> Deveraj:
> Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you the locality (and
hence HDFS short
> circuit) of reads if you were to couple it with the favored nodes. The
cost is of course more WAL
> files... In the current situation (no WALpr) it would create quite some
traffic c
*. Can
we agree on nomenclature?
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Thanks Jon for bringing this to dev@.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:01 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > Fundamentally, I'd prefer focusing on making HBase "HBasier"
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:21 AM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
>
> > With this in mind, I actually I making the case that we would group the
> all
> > the regions from RS-A onto the same set of preferred regions servers.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > > Deveraj:
> > > Jonathan Hsieh, WAL per region (WALpr) would give you the locality (and
> > hence HDFS short
> > > circuit) of reads if
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:37 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> Responses inlined.
>
> On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:00 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > For the most efficient consistent read-recovery (shadow
> regions/memstores),
> > it would make sense to have them assigned to t
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 3:07 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:42 AM, Enis Söztutar
> wrote:
> >
> > > On Mon, Dec 2, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Jonathan Hsieh
> > wrote:
> > >
be different potential sweet spots if read-replica regions and
shadow memstore regions were co-located at region on recover time with
trade offs for fast consistent recovery, ability to have more recent
values, locality optimizations and load balancing optimizations.
Jon.
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
x27;s master is based of the hbase 0.20/0.89 master which is
significantly different than the hbase master from in 0.94/0.96/trunk
today.
Jon.
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
; > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 2:04 PM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:51 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 11:07 AM, Enis Söztutar wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks Jon for bringing this to dev@.
> > >
> > >
&g
on against two
clusters in the same HDFS / datacenter and add a "bulk load replication"
feature?
We'd get latency in the seconds (closer to my expected definition of
eventual consistency)
Jon
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:47 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at
HBASE-9827 Intermittent TestLogRollingNoCluster#testContendedLogRolling
> > failure
> > HBASE-9785 Fix heap size reporting in HRegion
> > HBASE-9821 Scanner id could collide
> > HBASE-9694 HBaseTestingUtility.createTable infinite loop
> > HBASE-9772 Normalize new client default values
> > HBASE-9768 Two issues in AsyncProcess
> > HBASE-9784 Switch to Hadoop-2.2
> > HBASE-9793 Offline a region before it's closed could cause double
> > assignment
> > HBASE-9798 Include dependency hamcrest-core
> > HBASE-9796 npe in RegionServerCallable
> > HBASE-9776 Test Load And Verify Fails with TableNotEnabledException
> > HBASE-9788 [WINDOWS] Update rest server class name
> > HBASE-9755 Cannot run classes in hbase-server tests jar from command line
> > HBASE-9791 MR initializes scanner twice
> > HBASE-9773 Master aborted when hbck asked the master to assign a region
> > that was already online
> > HBASE-9720
> > TestSplitTransactionOnCluster#testShutdownFixupWhenDaughterHasSplit
> > occasionally times out
> > HBASE-9771 [WebUI] Humanize store and blockcache statistics on RS
> > HBASE-9570 With AccessDeniedException, HBase shell would be better to
> just
> > display the error message to be user friendly
> > HBASE-9758 Log missing rows and their regions if ITBLL fails
> > HBASE-9692 TestOrderedBytes doesn't display the arrays correctly
> >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
I don't know -- I'll test this against 0.96.0 and report.
Jon.
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:13 AM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> Is your test running well on 0.96.0?
>
> JM
>
>
> 2013/12/4 Jonathan Hsieh
>
> > -1
> >
> > I ha
I've filed an issue for this and will post more results there. (against
0.96.0 etc).
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10079
On Wed, Dec 4, 2013 at 8:10 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> -1
>
> I have a new test I tried on 0.96.1rc1. (polishing to share). Run #2 with
peration specifically).
>
>
>
> ____
> From: Jonathan Hsieh
> To: "dev@hbase.apache.org"
> Sent: Wednesday, December 4, 2013 8:16 AM
> Subject: Re: ANN: The second hbase-0.96-1 release candidate is available
> for download
>
>
> I've filed an
) or even better just fix the problem.
Thanks,
Jon.
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
> I do agree with Jon that no new warnings should be introduced.
>
> Currently 3 new Findbugs appear in QA reports.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 7:13 AM, Jonathan Hsieh
> >
> wrote:
>
> > Just a reminder -- we do not want to introduce new jav
> > > On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 12:31 PM, Stack wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Should we at least deprecate it in 0.98 or maybe
> > > > > even just drop it in 0.98?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 deprecate
> > > > +0 drop
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Best regards,
> > > >
> > > >- Andy
> > > >
> > > > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> > Hein
> > > > (via Tom White)
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
A little delayed but more questions.
On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 10:41 PM, Devaraj Das wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 3, 2013 at 6:49 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > The read replicas doc mentions something a little more intrusive in the
> "3
> > options" section bu
a
> > branch, and at the end of
> > that, we are hoping we can have something useful and working (but without
> > wal tailing and async
> > wal replication), and we will have a more detailed plan for the remaining
> > steps. We would love to
> > hear more feedback of how to test / stabilize the feature at the merge
> > discussions.
> >
>
> Sounds good E.
>
> St.Ack
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
pachehbase-037/
> >
> > 152 issues [1] have been fixed since 0.96.0, mostly performance
> improvement
> > and bug fixes.
> >
> > Shall we release this as hbase-0.96.1? Please vote by Monday, December
> > 16th.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Your HBase Team
> >
> > 1. http://goo.gl/ZgYBW2
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
on it.
(similar to 0.94.6.1).
[0] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10186
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10012
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
Should be up for people to try shortly.
Jon
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
anks,
Jon.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Argh +1
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 8:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I was reviewing some patches [0] and found that we introduced an API
> > incompatibility in 0.
Scratch that -- I was able to retrieve my passphrase.
Currently uploading artifacts to my people.apache.org and to maven repo for
release candidacy.
Jon.
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 12:33 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
> So I've gotten through most of the build/branch related processe
k look and vote +1/-1 by 12/18/13 23:59 pacific time. If this passes
we'll take down 0.96.1.
Please check the release mechanics -- this is my first attempt at an hbase
release.
Thanks!
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10188
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer
grats Liang!
> >
> >-Todd
> >
> >
> >On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Ted Yu >
> wrote:
> >
> >> Congratulations, Liang.
> >>
> >> On Dec 18, 2013, at 4:47 PM, Stack >
> wrote:
> >>
> >> > 谢良 has been
in/hbase org.apache.hadoop.hbase.util.LoadTestTool -write
> > 10:10:100
> > > > -num_keys 100 -read 100:30
> > > > -- bin/hbase
> > "org.apache.hadoop.hbase.test.IntegrationTestBigLinkedList
> > > > Loop 1 1 300 /tmp/biglinkedlist 1&
that is fixed by the
new lock?)
Thanks,
Jon.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 9:01 AM, Ted Yu wrote:
> Jon:
> If Stack gives the greenlight, I can certainly port it to 0.96 branch.
>
> Cheers
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > When I run the t
erver.hlog.lowreplication.rolllimit", 5);
>
> When consecutive log rolls exceeds the above conf value, lowReplicationRoll
> is disabled.
>
> If replica count goes down because of issue in Datanodes, the above limit
> would be reached ultimately.
>
> Cheers
>
> On Thu,
Vote passes with 5 binding +1's. ( apurtell, eclark, stack, enis, jmhsieh).
Pushing out the release and announcement to user@.
Thanks,
Jon.
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 12:12 PM, Stack wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > ...
> >
&
ix [3] that addressed an api
compatibility problem introduced between 0.96.0 ad 0.96.1. We will be
removing 0.96.1.
Thanks!
Your HBase Team
[1] http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/hbase/
[2] http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#upgrade0.96
[3] http://goo.gl/q4S94X
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Sof
atch happened? Or is it only svn tag (and I am just assuming that works
> > alright wrt not including 0.96.2 patches).
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:29 PM, Jonathan Hsieh
> wrote:
> >
> > > The HBase Team is pleased to announce the immediate release of
gt; > Hi,
> >Can anybody tell me if future HBase release will integrate 3149 for
> > Make flush decisions per column family？
> >
> > By the way, for current HBase, if the simultaneous flush is the only
> > issue? I mean, to create 10 CFs will not be
ting 0.96 back to a releasable state.
>
> Does trunk need a release manager?
>
>
> Comments?
>
> -- Lars
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
ch I'm not aware (please let me know!).
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com
$2}' |
grep HBASE | head -1000 | grep -v \\: | grep -v \\. | wc
888 888 10011
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Andrew Purtell wrote:
> Oh, we don't want the "."? It's pretty universal in Hadoop land (just
> checked common, hdfs, mapreduce, yarn, and
method was changed, what's more with a
> signature that renders it unusable.
>
> --
> Benoit "tsuna" Sigoure
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
tomorrow.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
o RCs and I am hoping to get a third out tomorrow.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
ompat not be a
> criteria for 0.98 releases. Otherwise it would have been. :-)
>
> On Feb 4, 2014, at 2:46 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> Andrew,
>
> I basically agree with lars here -- the ship has sailed here. However,
> there are some patches that restored binary co
C
> > > >based
> > > >actions and move everything else to plugins.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >--
> > > >Best regards,
> > > >
> > > > - Andy
> > > >
> > > >Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet
> Hein
> > > >(via Tom White)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity
> > to
> > > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> > > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> > that
> > > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > > received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> > immediately
> > > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
d say let this be so. We could run a vote but my
> > > > thinking is that any one interested in RM'ing can just volunteer to
> do
> > > the
> > > > next one; it's healthy spreading the RM role IMO.
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
with
> > poorly descriptive commit messages threaded throughout branch history.
> > Maybe a weekly Sunday rebase (perhaps with squashing) and force push
> would
> > not be too onerous.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >- Andy
>
he Regions. We then traverse
> the final all merged leftist tree, write its data to a HFile and write the
> new memstore being used for write's data into the HFile as well.
>
> It's just a thought.Please let me know your feedback and comments on it.
>
> Regards,
>
>
'll update that chart otherwise.
> >
> > While we are at it, should 1.0 support hadoop1 or not. I think it would
> be
> > good to keep support for h1 in 1.0, and drop it in 2.0 line. But it would
> > mean if we do not drop support, we have to keep the support through 1.1,
> > 1.2, etc.
> >
> > Enis
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
noon.
> >
> > -n
> >
> > [0]: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#maven.snapshot
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
He has contributed some
> > sweet
> > > > patches since he started hanging out in these parts. Keep up the
> great
> > > > work Honghua.
> > > >
> > > > St.Ack
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
new
> blocker.
> >
> > Please try out the candidate and vote +1/-1 by midnight Pacific Time
> (00:00
> > -0800 GMT) on March 31 on whether or not we should release this as
> 0.98.1.
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >- Andy
> >
> > Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> > (via Tom White)
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
edits.
Jon.
On Mon, Apr 14, 2014 at 10:37 PM, Vladimir Rodionov
wrote:
> Todd, how about 300 regions with 3x replication? Or 1000 regions? This is
> going to be 3000 files. on HDFS. per one RS. When I said that it does not
> scale, I meant that exactly that.
>
--
// Jon
t;
>
> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 7:11 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > It makes sense to have as many wals as # of spindles / replication factor
> > per machine. This should be decoupled from the number of regions on a
> > region server. So for a cluster with 12 spindles
udiu Soroiu
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > After some tunning I managed to
> > > > reduce it to 8 seconds in total and for the moment it fits the needs.
> > > >
> > >
> > > What did you do Claudiu to get the time down?
> > > Thanks,
> > > St.Ack
> > >
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
rgets in Jira and some issues targeted to 0.99.0 and
> some to 1.0.0.
>
> Which one should we use?
>
> -- Lars
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:40 PM, Nick Dimiduk wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 16, 2014 at 9:28 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer if we got rid of one -- maybe mark all as 0.99 and remove
> 1.0.0.
> > When we branch 1.0, we rename 0.99 to 1.0 and create a 1.1-SNAPSHOT
&
> have seen . Do we have any guideline for removing those? (when) The
> current Trunk going tp be 1.0, I think this is the time for cleanp.. What
> do u say?
>
> -Anoop-
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
the HBase Developer mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
types are slower than they should be and they start
> coming up w/ their own encodings as workarounds; now you are back to
> square one you need to version it all.
>
> Was proposed that we try and unify around a typing strategy that would work
> as
> the ONE way to do it in HBase with Phoenix going to try and come up on it
> first.
> To be continued up on the HBase dev list.
>
> Another proposal that had alot of nods in favor was that we not require
> 1.0 and 2.0 to be compatible.
>
> Notes ran out at this stage.
>
> St.Ack
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
king on HBASE-10336 "Remove
> >> deprecated usage of Hadoop HttpServer in InfoServer", I first want to
> >> assess the normal behavior before testing the changes.
> >>
> >> Thx,
> >>
> >> Eric
> >>
> >> [1]
> >>
> >>
> https://raw.githubusercontent.com/datalayer/io.datalayer/master/hbase/server/src/main/resources/hbase-site.xml
> >>
> >> [2]
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/4430d10759f5e6392a0bd36395ba4f6bbc3bc94f
> >>
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
8MURE/edit#heading=h.o1cgqtsqgqyg
[3]
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1BJooXphOduuPJHEfd3dAeF9Md3Zp2kRG31WExI4l88E/edit#
[4]
http://www.meetup.com/Hadoop-Summit-Community-San-Jose/events/179081342/?fromJoin=179081342
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
>>
> >>>>> Things get fuzzy around complex data types: pojos, compound rowkeys
> (a
> >>>>> special case of pojo), maps/dicts, and lists/arrays. These types are
> >>>>> composed of other types and have different requirements based on
&
t; >
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10792?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20hbase-10070%20and%20fixversion%20%3D%200.99.0%20AND%20project%20%3D%20HBASE%20AND%20status%20%3D%20resolved
> > [4] https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@hbase.apache.org/msg25795.html
> > [5]
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/hbase/commit/e22c7efeac02efde3451a0c9ff9bdcd2725576d0
> > [6]
> >
> >
> http://www.slideshare.net/enissoz/hbase-high-availability-for-reads-with-time
> > [7] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-10070
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom White)
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
re on a
> per-patch basis.
>
>
It is possible.
> Enis
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 4:36 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > When we merged snapshots branch in we did this:
> >
> > t = trunk commit
> > s = snapshot branch commit
> > m = merge poin
Enis Soztutar
fenghh
Gary Helmling
Jean-Daniel Cryans
Jeffrey Zhong
jeffreyz
Jesse Yates
Jimmy Xiang
Jonathan Hsieh
Jonathan M Hsieh
jxiang
larsh
Lars Hofhansl
liangxie
Matteo Bertozzi
mbertozzi
Michael Stack
Michael Stack
ndimiduk
Nick Dimiduk
Nicolas Li
y alternate proposals? Which one we
> should do? I am more in favor of b) which will be the most flexible route
> to having true semantic versioning for the cost of added branch complexity.
> a) should be fine as well if we are fine with lazy branching for 2.0.
>
> Enis
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
te one? Unless I am not in the correct group or
> > something...
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2014 at 07:58PM, Jean-Marc Spaggiari wrote:
> > > Pretty trivial patch.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > JM
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
out painful, we'll revert to the
> merge approach similar to what you describe.
>
> Enis
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 7, 2014 at 7:41 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 5:05 PM, Enis Söztutar
> wrote:
> >
> > > My preference would be to
t;>> log
> > >>>>>>>> splitting (and Sergey S has submitted a patch for review),
> another
> > >>>> is
> > >>>>>>>> abstraction of ZK watcher (this is what I've been working on in
> > the
> > >>&g
oob" is used more regularly on HBase.
>
> I worry that "noob" might be viewed as pejorative and discourage some
> potential contributors.
>
> [1]: http://hbase.apache.org/book.html#jira
> [2]: http://s.apache.org/exr
> [3]: http://s.apache.org/XS6
>
> --
> Sean
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
re sense
> > (or if something else would be better still)?
> >
> > -Sean
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 5, 2014 at 10:35 AM, Andrew Purtell
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Yes we can change that. I volunteer to change it. What should the new
> > label
ke
> sure on the compaction side we take care of this in case we want to never
> delete any version?
>
> JM
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
trunk, but for 0.98.3 and 0.98.4 the docs are the vanilla docs.
> >>
> >> cheers,
> >> esteban.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Cloudera, Inc.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Best regards,
> >
> >- Andy
> >
&
ural sql-shell-style. I'd even consider a new "user shell"
that is parallel to the current "hacker" shell, with the goal marginalizing
the current shell for low level repair work.
> [1]: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jruby-users/qmLpZ7qDwZo/J_iYViplcq4J
>
> --
> Sean
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
ses to partition data by range? Why not by
> Hash or list? I belive in the design phase of HBase, this should be
> discussed.
>
> Thanks in adavance.
>
>
>
> Nai Yan
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 1:44 PM, Sean Busbey wrote:
> Responses inline
>
>
> On Thu, Aug 14, 2014 at 3:16 PM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > I've always found working with the jruby part of the hbase shell jarring
> > because many of the hbase commands don&
>
>
> [x] JMS orca
>
>
an active member of the HBase-related Apache
Phoenix project.
Please join me in congratulating Matteo, Nick and Jeffery on their new
roles!
Jon
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
; > Per suggestion of Sean in HBASE-11860 I'm sending this to the list to
> > > discuss this idea:
> > >
> > > I've been thinking that we should support upgrades from HBase clusters
> > > running 0.94 to HBase 1.x initially. Do you guys concur that we
l upgrades, major & minor, could be done
> "rolling" as proto bufs would ensure backward compatibility.
>
> This was a pretty important feature to allow us to upgrade live clusters
> without down times.
> --Suraj
>
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2014 at 3:16 PM, J
Hey all,
I was able to commit about 4 hours ago but the next patch I'm trying to
commit has been failing with the no dav (bad password). and haven't seen
any other commits since then.
is this just me or is it affecting anyone else?
Thanks,
Jon.
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase
maven,
> > it attempted to authenticate, and eventually it locked the account. I
> > removed the offending stanza but I haven't tried since.
> >
> > -n
> >
> > On Wednesday, September 17, 2014, Jonathan Hsieh
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hey all,
> >
re I open a JIRA.
> >
> > Why does HBCK need write permissions if there isn't any --repair ish flag
> > specified? Should it not only be read permissions required?
> >
> > JM
> >
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
Congrats Sean!
On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 12:10 PM, Stack wrote:
> Sean has been doing excellent work around these environs. Your PMC made him
> a committer in recognition. Welcome Sean!
>
> St.Ack
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer
> When ever *hasArray() is false* - using getXXXArray() API would throw
> *UnSupportedOperation
> Exception*.
>
> As said if we want *getXXXArray()* to be supported as per the existing way
> then getXXXBuffer() and getXXXOffset(), getXXXLength() should be clearly
> documented.
>
> Thoughts!!!
>
> Regards
> Ram & Anoop
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
imilar in behaviour could lead to lot more confusion?
> Internally it is more easy.
>
>
> On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 11:10 AM, Jonathan Hsieh wrote:
>
> > Ram,
> >
> > Can we essentially do both by creating the new getXxBuffer, and then also
> > creating new o
> . He's been a recent frequent contributor and collaborator on changes and
> backports related to metadata tables, ZooKeeper, and the Master.
>
> --
> Best regards,
>
>- Andy
>
> Problems worthy of attack prove their worth by hitting back. - Piet Hein
> (via Tom
the fold.
>
> Yours,
> St.Ack
>
--
// Jonathan Hsieh (shay)
// HBase Tech Lead, Software Engineer, Cloudera
// j...@cloudera.com // @jmhsieh
adoop/hbase/mapreduce/TestLoadIncrementalHFiles.java
<https://review.cloudera.org/r/4884/#comment12937>
nit (fix upstream if there)
- Jonathan Hsieh
On Feb. 4, 2015, 9:55 p.m., Srikanth Srungarapu wrote:
>
> ---
> This is
1 - 100 of 790 matches
Mail list logo
