I've updated the proposed DBD API, and written a better description
of it at URL:http://www.apache.org/~niq/dbd.html. This defines
only the API, decoupled from my software implementing it.
The only material change to the software is that I have added
random-access to SELECT result sets, as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: stoddard
Date: Fri Dec 3 04:20:12 2004
New Revision: 109667
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?view=revrev=109667
Log:
Add mod_arm4 to the modules page
Modified:
httpd/site/trunk/docs/modules/index.html
Modified: httpd/site/trunk/docs/modules/index.html
Ok,
Hi,
I'm not sure if this is really the right list for this, but I got no
response from the users list, so I'm wondering if some of the
developers might be able to shed some light. Sorry if it's
inappropriate to mail this list with these questions.
I've been reading a bit about Apache2
And, given the problem described about long running request causing
children to potentially fall off the scoreboard, what happens in the
following scenario:
Each of the X servers has 1 or more threads working on lng requests.
Other threads in each of those servers finish off M requests,
On Fri, 03 Dec 2004 18:07:12 -0500, Ronald Park [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And, given the problem described about long running request causing
children to potentially fall off the scoreboard, what happens in the
following scenario:
Each of the X servers has 1 or more threads working on lng
Kristina Clair wrote:
I'm running apache2 on redhat 7.3 servers with very heavy http
traffic. I'm wondering if it might be wise for me to try to use the
worker MPM rather than the default prefork. Does anyone have any
real-world experience with this? Our users are allowed to run any cgi
scripts
On Fri, 3 Dec 2004, Andy Armstrong wrote:
Kristina Clair wrote:
I'm running apache2 on redhat 7.3 servers with very heavy http
traffic. I'm wondering if it might be wise for me to try to use the
worker MPM rather than the default prefork. Does anyone have any
real-world experience with
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Christopher H. Laco wrote:
Stas Bekman wrote:
Still someone needs to do the work and verify that things are working.
That will fun in and of itself. Right now, the only thing close to
meeting the requirements of running the overall tests is my 5.6.1
install on my XP
