Hello devs,
It's been four months since I originally proposed this new feature in
"mod_fcgid". During this time I've tested and deployed it on hundreds of
busy production servers. It works as expected. If enabled, web visitors
get an immediate response when FastCGI is overloaded, and no RAM is
Wow! This is great stuff. Brotli support has been in my TODO
queue for awhile.
Thanks!
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 8:32 AM, Evgeny Kotkov
> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> This patch adds a module for dynamic Brotli (RFC 7932) compression in httpd.
>
> The new compression format is supported by Mozilla Fir
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Wow! This is great stuff. Brotli support has been in my TODO
> queue for awhile.
>
> Thanks!
+1, cool stuff and thanks!
--
Eric Covener
cove...@gmail.com
Eric Covener writes:
>> Wow! This is great stuff. Brotli support has been in my TODO
>> queue for awhile.
>>
>> Thanks!
>
> +1, cool stuff and thanks!
Glad to hear that, thanks everyone.
I would be happy to continue the work on this module, for instance, by
adding the necessary documentation an
On 21.07.2016, at 16:27, Eric Covener wrote:
> We have httpoxy as well as a rewrite+fastcgi regression in the queue.
> Jim, do you have a near-term release in you we can plan around?
Just to *bump* this one up... ;)
David
Am 19.09.2016 um 16:14 schrieb Evgeny Kotkov:
Eric Covener writes:
Wow! This is great stuff. Brotli support has been in my TODO
queue for awhile.
Thanks!
+1, cool stuff and thanks!
Glad to hear that, thanks everyone.
I would be happy to continue the work on this module, for instance, b
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion wrote:
>
> On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely
>> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On
>> 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider c
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 11:35 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
> just an idea - wouldn't it make sense to add 'br' support for mod_deflate
> and have it preferred when the client says in it's request headers that it
> supports the encoding instead having two modules for the same thing just
> using differe
On 09/19/2016 10:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I would prefer to keep them separate even if we have to teach something
to coordinate them (a module, some new support in mod_filter, some
kind of hook?)
+1. (If it proves difficult to make separate compression modules play
well together, that's a
Am 19.09.2016 um 19:56 schrieb Jacob Champion:
On 09/19/2016 10:12 AM, Eric Covener wrote:
I would prefer to keep them separate even if we have to teach something
to coordinate them (a module, some new support in mod_filter, some
kind of hook?)
+1. (If it proves difficult to make separate c
10 matches
Mail list logo