+---+
| Bugzilla Bug ID |
| +-+
| | Status: UNC=Unconfirmed NEW=New ASS=Assigned
+1 Windows Good to go.
On Thursday 06/07/2017 at 19:45, Jim Jagielski wrote:
The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
version 2.4.27 can be found at the usual place:
http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.27 GA.
[ ] +1: Good to go
Hi.
I am observing a content type httpd/unix-directory returned from a
subrequest to a directory. Is this expected behaviour?
Sincerely,
Joachim
--
Papier ist gebundenes CO2. Bitte drucken Sie diese EMail aus und archivieren
Sie sie.
I compiled 2.4.27 with --with-included-apr (srclib) apr-1.6.2, apr-util-1.6.0
w/ openssl-1.1.0f (compiled manually)
w/ mod_lua (w/ system libraries)
without http2
under:
debian 9
rhel 6.7
No issues. (+1)
2017-07-09 10:49 GMT+02:00 Steffen :
> +1 Windows Good to go.
>
> On Thursday 06/07/2017 a
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 1:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.27 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
+1 AIX/xlc/ppc64
ssl/proxy.t is unusable on my system because openssl 1.1 clients seems
to be hosed for me, even outside of httpd.
--
Eric Covener
co
With sufficient +1 (binding) votes and no -1 votes, and
after the required 72 waiting period, I call this vote CLOSED
and the vote PASSES.
Will move the artifacts over so that mirrors can pick
them up in prep for an announcement tomorrow.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 7:45 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.27 GA.
[x] +1: Good to go
FWIW (after the RESULT), tested on Debian(s) 7, 8 and 9.
Thanks Jim.
On Thu, Jul 6, 2017 at 9:33 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
>
> Your votes on two decisions, please?
[+1] Release 2.2.34 as legacy GA
Tested on Debian(s) 7, 8 and 9.
[-0] Retire the 2.2.x branch from any further maintenance.
I don't mind participating to more security releases if that's necessar
On Jul 8, 2017 6:14 PM, "Nick Kew" wrote:
> > > It probably makes sense to work on a nonblocking architecture for
> > > proxied responses in general.
Is that really the issue in the first place? We have a concept of
flushing, and can implement more finely-tuned throughput than merely
blocking v
Thanks Jim for the smooth 2.4.27!
> Am 09.07.2017 um 20:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> With sufficient +1 (binding) votes and no -1 votes, and
> after the required 72 waiting period, I call this vote CLOSED
> and the vote PASSES.
>
> Will move the artifacts over so that mirrors can pick
> them u
Von: Luca Toscano [mailto:toscano.l...@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Samstag, 8. Juli 2017 09:52
An: Apache HTTP Server Development List
Betreff: Re: mod_proxy_fcgi and flush
Hi Jacob, Helmut!
2017-07-06 20:54 GMT+02:00 Jacob Champion
mailto:champio...@gmail.com>>:
On 07/06/2017 11:13 AM, Jim Jagielsk
Hi,
According rfc1123 the configuration:
ProxyPass "/" "balancer://127"
BalancerMember ajp://tomcat1:8009
BalancerMember ajp://tomcat2:8009
127 looks valid but it is rejected by httpd, apr_parse_addr_port() takes
127 as port instead hostname.
So addr is NULL, then I have:
"AH01157: err
12 matches
Mail list logo