On Jul 8, 2017 6:14 PM, "Nick Kew" <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > It probably makes sense to work on a nonblocking architecture for > > > proxied responses in general. Is that really the issue in the first place? We have a concept of flushing, and can implement more finely-tuned throughput than merely blocking vs non-blocking. The point at issue is for PHP to communicate a flush with proxy_fcgi, and for proxy_fcgi then to honour it. It seems one or both of those things isn't happening. Not sure yet, but based on Luca's note, I think there's a good chance that my skim of the code gave me the wrong idea. If FPM sends a full message in a flush (and I can't see why it wouldn't) this might be fixable with a single FPM option. --Jacob
