On Sun, Nov 12, 2017 at 5:11 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
>> Below is an addition to the first message: It appears (from the -bloadmap
>> output) that XML_Parse is suppossed to be coming from apr-util. Or is it
>> APR-UTIL is the caller?
>>
>> :g/XML_Parse/p
>> (ld): keep XML_Parse
>> ld: 0711-301 WARN
> Below is an addition to the first message: It appears (from the -bloadmap
> output) that XML_Parse is suppossed to be coming from apr-util. Or is it
> APR-UTIL is the caller?
>
> :g/XML_Parse/p
> (ld): keep XML_Parse
> ld: 0711-301 WARNING: Symbol specified with the -u flag not defined:
> XML_Par
On 07/11/2017 17:21, Jan Ehrhardt wrote:
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200):
I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not
building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming
apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build.
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200):
>I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not
>building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming
>apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build.
>
>With the expat/xml changes in apr-util
Steffen in gmane.comp.apache.devel (Thu, 19 Oct 2017 23:15:32 +0200):
>I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not
>building out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming
>apr-util 1.6.1 it should be possible to build.
>
>With the expat/xml changes in apr-util
Will more than the required 3 +1 (binding) votes and some other
unbinding +1 votes, and no -1s, I call this vote not only CLOSED but
also PASSED.
Thx to all!
Well I got it now thanks mostly to your instructions Steefen, took
awhile but once I put the the pieces together I see what needs to be done.
On 10/20/2017 1:44 AM, Steffen wrote:
Nope, just double clicking Apache.dsw does now not create the xml
solution. And without xml solution httpd does
Nope, just double clicking Apache.dsw does now not create the xml
solution. And without xml solution httpd does not build (httpd
regression).
When I revert the Apache.dsw changes all fine, no headache and is not
complicated at all here.
I do not care where expat is located.
And cmake i
On 10/19/2017 5:49 PM, William A Rowe Jr wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Steffen wrote:
I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building
out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it
should be possible to build.
With the exp
On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Steffen wrote:
> I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building
> out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it
> should be possible to build.
>
> With the expat/xml changes in apr-util and httpd, it i
I said before: In Apache.dsw is now project xml removed, it is not building
out of the box with current released apr-util. With coming apr-util 1.6.1 it
should be possible to build.
With the expat/xml changes in apr-util and httpd, it is now a hard job for most
win users to build.
Going wi
+1. CentOS 6 1686/x86_64, CentOS 7 x86_64
Details:
QA TEST Pass
Version : ea-apache24-2.4.29-1.3.
Steps:
CentOS 7
[root@68 ~]# httpd -v
Server version: Apache/2.4.29 (cPanel)
Server built: Oct 18 2017 17:14:35
[root@68 ~]# uname -r
4.9.54-29.el7
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:00:36PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to g
+1 (binding):
o macOS 10.12 / Xcode9
o CentOS 6, 64bit
o Ubuntu 16.04, 64bit
o Fedora 23, 64bit
> On Oct 17, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/
On 18/10/2017 05:00, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +0: meh
> [ ] -1:
And a +1 report from Bernard Spil , who just built with
libressl on debian.
> Am 18.10.2017 um 11:06 schrieb Stefan Eissing :
>
>
>
>> Am 17.10.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>>
>> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
>> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>>
>>
> Am 17.10.2017 um 21:00 schrieb Jim Jagielski :
>
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
>
> [ ] +1: Good to go
> [ ] +
On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 03:00:36PM -0400, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> The pre-release test tarballs for Apache httpd
> version 2.4.29 can be found at the usual place:
>
> http://httpd.apache.org/dev/dist/
>
> I'm calling a VOTE on releasing these as Apache httpd 2.4.29 GA.
+1 - looks good on Fe
18 matches
Mail list logo