Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-10-10 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Mon, Sep 19, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > > On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > > > On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: > >> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely > >> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a su

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-10-10 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'm thinking of a T&R around the last week of Oct...

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-10-05 Thread Jim Jagielski
I'd like to see us work on having a 2.4.24 out sometime this month... Can we spend some time on existing backports and seeing what of usefulness in trunk *can and should* be backported to 2.4? Thx!! > On Sep 19, 2016, at 11:36 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > > >> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob C

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-09-19 Thread Jim Jagielski
> On Aug 2, 2016, at 2:59 PM, Jacob Champion wrote: > > On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: >> One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely >> opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On >> 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider c

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-09-19 Thread David Zuelke
On 21.07.2016, at 16:27, Eric Covener wrote: > We have httpoxy as well as a rewrite+fastcgi regression in the queue. > Jim, do you have a near-term release in you we can plan around? Just to *bump* this one up... ;) David

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-08-02 Thread Jacob Champion
On 08/02/2016 11:12 AM, William A Rowe Jr wrote: One additional thought... On 2.2 and 2.4 I see this change as entirely opt-in, no disruption to a user performing a subversion upgrade. On 2.6/3.0 I'd want us to seriously consider changing the out-of-the-box default to strict parsing. +1. (I ha

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-08-02 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Aug 2, 2016 11:58 AM, "William A Rowe Jr" wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> >> I think we should look into other stuff we could fold in in >> the short term. > > > Seems overdue for us to fold the HTTP_STRICT logic back into 2.4 and 2.2 > before we tag and rol

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-08-02 Thread William A Rowe Jr
On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 5:10 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > I think we should look into other stuff we could fold in in > the short term. > Seems overdue for us to fold the HTTP_STRICT logic back into 2.4 and 2.2 before we tag and roll again. It seems pretty odd not to follow RFC2068, never mind the

Re: 2.4.24 soon?

2016-07-22 Thread Jim Jagielski
I think we should look into other stuff we could fold in in the short term. > On Jul 21, 2016, at 10:27 AM, Eric Covener wrote: > > We have httpoxy as well as a rewrite+fastcgi regression in the queue. > Jim, do you have a near-term release in you we can plan around? > > -- > Eric Covener > co